Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

31. Biomedizinische und klinimetrische Ansätze in der Ursachenforschung beim perioperativen Risiko: Erstellung einer deutschen ASA-Klassifikation

Perioperative risk research: biomedical and clinimetric aspects

  • B. Wissenschaftliches Programm
  • I. Hauptthemen E. Perioperatives Risiko — Kontroversen zur Pathogenese
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Perioperative risk research with biomedical (biochemical, physiological) methods must grow up as a main topic in surgical research. However, operative risk has also to be analysed with methods of clinimetrics, such as formal (objective) decision making and epidemiology. Only by this way a convincing practical dimension is added to basic scientific statements. ASA-classification of the preoperative physical status is a global index for estimating the operative risk. It contains objective findings, subjective impressions and the final clinical judgement. For this reason it is so flexible. For a multicentre trial on perioperative risk and histamine an empirical index was constructed using both the ASA-classification and the Mannheim-Munich risk check list.

Zusammenfassung

Ursachenforschung beim perioperativen Risiko mit biomedizinischen (biochemischen, physiologischen) Methoden muss ein Schwerpunkt in der Chirurgie werden. Perioperatives Risiko muss auch mit den Methoden der Klinimetrie, wie objektiver Entscheidungsfindung und Epidemiologie analysiert werden. Nur so kommt zum wissenschaftlichen Ansatz auch eine überzeugende praktische Dimension. Die ASA-Klassifikation ist ein globaler Index zur präoperativen Risikoeinschätzung. Sie enthält objektive Befunde, den subjektiven Eindruck und das abschliessende klinische Urteil. Gerade deshalb ist sie so flexibel. Für die Mainz-Marburger multizentrische Studie über Perioperatives Risiko und Histamin" wurde ein empirischer Index aus ASA-Klassifikation und Mannheim-Münchner Risikocheckliste konstruiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Garfield E (1985) Journal citation studies. 45. Surgery journals: another operation in citation analysis. Current Contents — LS No. 21:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  3. Böttcher S, Schuh FT (1987) Anaesthesiologische Zeitschriften: Versuch einer Bewertung mittels Zitatenanalyse. Anaesthesist 36:187–189

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff E (1961) The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 178:261–266

    Google Scholar 

  5. Memery HN (1965) Anesthesia mortality in private practice. JAMA 194:1185- 1188

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Halothane Study (1966) Summary. JAMA 197:775–788

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vacanti ChJ, VanHouten RJ, Hill RC (1970) A statistical analysis of the relationship of physical status to postoperative mortality in 68,388 cases. Anesth Anal 49:564–566

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marx GF, Mateo CV, Orkin LR (1973) Computer analysis of postanesthetic deaths. Anesthesiology 39:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Owens WD, Dykes MHM, Gilbert JP, McPeek B, Ettling MB (1975) Development of two indices of postoperative morbidity. Surgery 77:586–592

    Google Scholar 

  10. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turnbull KW, Fancourt-Smith PF, Banting GC (1980) Death within 48 hours of anaesthesia at the Vancouver General Hospital. Can Anesth Soc J 27:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hovi-Viander M (1980) Death associated with anaesthesia in Finland. Br J Anaesth 1980 52:483–489

    Google Scholar 

  13. Del Guercio LRM, Cohn JD (1980) Monitoring operative risk in the elderly. JAMA 243:1350–1355

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farrow SC, Fowkes FGR, Lunn JN, Robertson IB, Samuel P (1982) Epidemiology in anaesthesia. II: Factors affecting mortality in hospital. Br J Anaesth 54:811–817

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hatton F, Tiret L, Vourc' G, Desmonsts JM, Otteni JC, Scherpereel P (1983) Morbidity and mortality associated with anesthesia — French survey: preliminary results. In: Vickers MD, Lunn JN (Hrsg) Mortality in anaesthesia. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwam SJ, Gold MI, Craythorne WB (1982) The ASA physical status classification: a revision. Anesthesiology 57:A439

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keats S (1978) The ASA classification of physical status - a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 49:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ohmann C, Lorenz W, Stöltzing H, Thon K (1987) Grundlagen der Risikoforschung in der Chirurgie: Definition, Berechnung und klinische Anwendung auf das Problem der oberen Gastrointestinalblutung. Chirurg 58:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  19. Doenicke A, Lorenz W (1970) Histaminfreisetzung und anaphylaktische Reaktionen bei Narkosen. Biochemische und klinische Aspekte. Anaesthesist 19:413–417

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lorenz W, Doenicke A, Meyer R, Reimann H-J, Kusche K, Barth H, Geesing H, Hutzel M, Weissenbacher B (1972) Histamine release in man by propanidid and thiopentone: Pharmacological effects and clinical consequences. Br J Anaesth 44:355–369

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doenicke A, Lorenz W, Beigl R, Bezecny H, Uhlig G, Klmar L, Praetorius B, Mann G (1973) Histamine release after intravenous application of short-acting hypnotics: a comparison of etomidate, althesin (CT 1341) and propanidid. Br J Anaesth 45:1097–1104

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenz W, Seidel W, Doenicke A, Tauber R, Reimann H-J, Uhlig R, Mann G, Dormann P, Schmal A, Häfner G, Hamelmann H (1974) Elevated plasma histamine concentrations in surgery: Causes and clinical significance. Klin Wochenschr 52:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watkins J (1983) Etomidate: an “immunologically safe” anaesthetic agent. Anaesthesia 38:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schöning B, Lorenz W, Doenicke A (1985) Histamin H1- plus H2-Rezeptorenblockade als zusätzliches Prdmedikationsprinzip in der elektiven Chirurgie. Schweiz Rundsch Med (Praxis) 74:315–322

    Google Scholar 

  25. Messmer K, Lorenz W, Sunder-Plassmann L, Klövekorn W, Hutzel M (1970) Histamine release as a cause of acute hypotension following rapid colloid infusion. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 267:433 -445

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lorenz W, Doenicke A, Messmer K, Reimann H-J, Thermann M, Lahn W, Berr J, Schmal A, Dormann P, Regenfuss P, Hamelmann H (1976) Histamine release in human subjects by modified gelatin (Haemaccel ®) and dextran: An explanation for anaphylactoid reactions observed under clinical conditions? Br J Anaesth 48:151–165

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lorenz W, Doenicke A, Schöning B, Karges H, Schmal A (1981) Incidence and mechanisms of adverse reactions to polypeptides in man and dog. In: Hennessen W (Hrsg) Joint WHO/IABS symposium on the standardization of albumin, plasma substitutes and plasmapheresis. Geneva 1980. Dev Biol Stand 48:207–234

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ring J, Messmer K (1977) Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet 1:466–469

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richter W, Messmer K, Hedin H, Ring J (1978) Adverse reactions to plasma substitutes: incidence and pathomechanisms. In: Watkins J, Ward AM (Hrsg) Adverse response to intravenous drugs. Academic Press, London, S 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hedin H, Richter W, Messmer K, Renck H2 Ljungström K-G, Laubenthal H2 (1981) Incidence, pathomechanism and prevention of dextran-induced anaphylactoid/anaphylactic reactions in man. In: Hennessen W (Hrsg) Joint WHOAABS symposium on the standardization of albumin, plasma substitutes and plasmapheresis, Geneva 1980. Dev Biol Stand 48:179–189

  31. Ring J, Seifert J, Lob G, Coulin K, Brendel W (1974) Humanalbuminunvertrdglichkeit: Klinische und immunologische Untersuchungen. Klin Wochenschr 52:595–598

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lorenz W, Doenicke A, Freund M, Schmal A, Dormann P, Praetorius B, Schürk-Bulich M (1975) Plasmahistaminspiegel beim Menschen nach rascher Infusion von Hydroxyäthylstärke: Ein Beitrag zur Frage allergischer oder anaphylaktoider Reaktionen nach Gabe eines neuen Plasmasubstitutes. Anaesthesist 24:228–230

    Google Scholar 

  33. Williams JG, Riley TRD, Moody RA (1983) Resuscitation experience in the Falkland Islands campain. Br Med J 286:775–777

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schreiber HW, Schwaiger M (1983) Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongressber) 361:241–287

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pietsch-Breitfeld B (1987) 7th Meeting of the Permanent Working Party on Clinical Studies (CAS) of the German Surgical Society. Theor Surg 1:220–221

    Google Scholar 

  36. Häring R (1987) Das Risiko in der Chirurgie. Aktuel Chir (im Druck)

  37. Lorenz W, Doenicke A (1985) Anaphylactoid reactions and histamine release by barbiturate induction agents: Clinical relevance and patho-mechanisms. Anesthesiology 63:351–352

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keats AS (1979) What do we know about anesthetic mortality? Anesthesiology 50:387–392

    Google Scholar 

  39. Feinstein AR (1983) An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med 99:843–846

    Google Scholar 

  40. Feinstein AR (1963) Boolean algebra and clinical taxonomy. N Engl J Med 269:929–938

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anonymous (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111

  42. Dripps RD, Eckenhoff JE, Vandam LD (1972) Introduction to anesthesia. The principles of safe practice. Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  43. Feinberg GL (1971) Obesity: class IV anesthesia risk. NY State J Med 71:2200–2201

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ahnefeld FW, Heinrich H (1983) Hat sich in der Routine des Anaesthesisten die Berücksichtigung von Risikofaktoren bewährt? Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongressber) 361:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nemes C, Niemer M, Noack G (1985) Sicherheitsprobleme in der Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. In: Datenbuch Anästhesiologie. Fischer, Stuttgart, S 390–395

    Google Scholar 

  46. Peter K, Unertl K, Wroblewski H (1986) Wertung der Risikofaktoren und peäoperative Untersuchungsprogramme. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed 181:45–46

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lorenz W, Ohmann C, Stöltzing H Thon K (1986) Grundlagen chirurgischer Indikationen: Hilfen zur Entscheidungsfindung. Langenbecks Arch Chir 369:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tannieres-Ruffie ML, Rius J, Levante A, Conseiller C (1981) Pre-operative assessment. Classification of risk. In: Conseiller C et al. (Hrsg) Complications of anesthesia, operative risk. Librairie Arnette, Paris, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 285–324

    Google Scholar 

  49. Feldmann U, Osswald P-M, Hartung H-J, Luth H (1985) Computer aided methods to predict perioperative risks. In: Computers in critical care and pulmonary medicine. Springer, Berlin, S 162–183

    Google Scholar 

  50. Osswald PM, Hartung H-J, Feldmann U (1985) Prognostische Aussagekraft einer prdoperativen Risikocheckliste. Anaesthesist 34:508–512

    Google Scholar 

  51. Unertl K, Wroblewski H, Gliikher S, Henrich G, Rauch M, Peter K (1985) Das Risiko in der Anaesthesie. MMW 127:609–612

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, W., Dick, W., Junginger, T. et al. 31. Biomedizinische und klinimetrische Ansätze in der Ursachenforschung beim perioperativen Risiko: Erstellung einer deutschen ASA-Klassifikation. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 372, 199–209 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297815

Key words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation