Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 184–194 | Cite as

Sequential morphologic and biochemical studies of naturally occurring wheat-sensitive enteropathy in Irish setter dogs

  • Roger M. Batt
  • Lynn McLean
  • Myra W. Carter
Original Articles

Abstract

This study has investigated the potential role of wheat in the pathogenesis of a naturally occurring enteropathy in Irish setter dogs. At eight months on a cereal-containing diet, jejunal biopsies from affected animals exhibited partial villus atrophy, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, and distinct biochemical abnormalities in the brush border. Activities of alkaline phosphatase and leucyl-2-naphthylamidase were almost undetectable while disaccharidases were unaltered. Activity of 5′-nucleotidase (basolateral membrane) was low, and reduced malate dehydrogenase reflected a loss of mitochondrial activity, but other organelles were unaffected. Recovery was achieved on a wheat-free diet. Relapse on subsequent wheat challenge was characterized by partial villus atrophy and a selective effect on the brush border: modal density was decreased and there was a severe loss of brush-border alkaline phosphatase activity. These findings document a wheat-sensitive enteropathy in Irish setter dogs and suggest that brush-border alkaline phosphatase is specifically susceptible to damage by wheat.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frazer AC: Discussion on some problems of steatorrhea and reduced stature. Proc R Soc Med 49:1009–1013, 1956Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornell HJ, Townley RRW: Investigation of possible intestinal peptidase deficiency in coeliac disease. Clin Chim Acta 43:113–125, 1973Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiser MM, Douglas AP: An alternative mechanism for gluten toxicity in coeliac disease. Lancet 1:567–569, 1976Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjarnason I, Peters TJ, Veall N: A persistent defect in intestinal permeability in coeliac disease demonstrated by a51Cr-labelled EDTA absorption test. Lancet 1:323–325, 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trier JS, Falchuk ZM, Carey MC, Schreiber DS: Celiac sprue and refractory sprue. Gastroenterology 75:307–316, 1978Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziegler K, Ferguson A: Coeliac disease.In Function and Dysfunction of the Small Intestine. RM Batt, TLJ Lawrence (eds). Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, 1984, pp 149–166Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marsh MN: Morphologic expression of immunologically mediated change and injury within the human small intestinal mucosa.In Function and Dysfunction of the Small Intestine. RM Batt, TLJ Lawrence (eds). Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, 1984, pp 167–198Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornell HJ, Rolles CJ: Further evidence of a primary mucosal defect in coeliac disease. Gut 19:253–259, 1978Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bloch R, Menge H, Martini GA, Riecken EO: Effect of gluten on glucose absorption from the small intestine in experimentally induced malabsorption in rats. Digestion 7:139–146, 1972Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandhu JS, Fraser DR: Effect of dietary cereals on intestinal permeability in experimental enteropathy in rats. Gut 24:825–830, 1983Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mowat AM, Ferguson A: Hypersensitivity reactions in the small intestine 6. Pathogenesis of the graft-versus-host reaction in the small intestinal mucosa of the mouse. Transplantation 32:238–243, 1981Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Batt RM, Carter MW, McLean L: Morphological and biochemical studies of a naturally occurring enteropathy in the Irish setter dog: A comparison with coeliac disease in man. Res Vet Sci 37:339–346, 1984Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batt RM, Mann LC: The specificity of the BT-PABA test for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in the dog. Vet Rec 108:303–307, 1981Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams DA, Batt RM: Diagnosis of canine exocrine pancreatic insufficiency by the assay of serum trypsin-like immunoreactivity. J Small Anim Pract 24:583–588, 1983Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Batt RM: Techniques for single and multiple peroral jejunal biopsy in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 20:259–268, 1979Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Batt RM, Mann LC: Evaluation of preformed Percoll and reorientating sucrose density gradient centrifugation for the analytical subcellular fractionation of dog liver. Res Vet Sci 34:272–279, 1983Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leighton F, Poole B, Beaufay H, Baudhuin P, Coffey JW, Fowler S, deDuve C: The large-scale separation of peroxisomes, mitochondria and lysosomes from livers of rats injected with Triton WR 1339. J Cell Biol 37:482–513, 1968Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Batt RM, Peters TJ: Subcellular fractionation studies on peroral jejunal biopsies from the dog. Res Vet Sci 25:94–100, 1978Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Batt RM, Bush BM, Peters TJ: Biochemical changes in the jejunal mucosa of dogs with naturally occurring exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Gut 20:709–715, 1979Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peters TJ, Batt RM, Heath JR, Tilleray J: The microassay of intestinal disaccharidases. Biochem Med 15:145–148, 1976Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schacterle GR, Pollack RL: A simplified method for the quantitative assay of small amounts of protein in biologic material. Anal Biochem 51:654–655, 1973Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Batt RM, Carter MW, McLean L: Wheat-sensitive enteropathy in Irish setter dogs: possible age-related brush border abnormalities. Res Vet Sci 39:80–83, 1985Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters TJ, Jones PE, Wells G: Analytical subcellular fractionation of jejunal biopsy specimens: Enzyme activities, organelle pathology and response to gluten withdrawal in patients with coeliac disease. Clin Sci Mol Med 55:285–292, 1978Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deren JJ, Broitman SA, Zamcheck N: Effect of diet upon intestinal disaccharidases and disaccharide absorption. J Clin Invest 46:186–195, 1967Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCarthy DM, Nicholson JA, Kim YS: Intestinal enzyme adaptation to normal diets of different composition. Am J Physiol 239:G445-G451, 1980Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Falchuk ZM, Gebhard RL, Sessoms C, Strober W: Anin vitro model of gluten-sensitive enteropathy. J Clin Invest 53:487–500, 1974Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Katz AJ, Falchuk ZM, Strober W, Shwachman H: Glutensensitive enteropathy. Inhibition by cortisol of the effect of gluten proteinin vitro. New Engl J Med 295:131–135, 1976Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kenny AJ, Maroux S: Topology of microvillar membrane hydrolases of kidney and intestine. Physiol Rev 62:91–128, 1982Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eichholz A: Studies on the organisation of the brush border in intestinal epithelial cells. V. Subfractionation of enzymatic activities of the microvillus membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 163:101–107, 1968Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Critchley DR, Howell KE, Eichholz A: Solubilization of brush borders of hamster small intestine and fractionation of some of the components. Biochim Biophys Acta 394:361–376, 1975Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Louvard D, Maroux S, Vannier Ch, Desnuelle P: Topological studies on the hydrolases bound to the intestinal brush border membrane 1. Solubilization by papain and Triton X-100. Biochim Biophys Acta 375:236–248, 1975Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Colbeau A, Maroux S: Integration of alkaline phosphatase in the intestinal brush border membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 511:39–51, 1978Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nayudu PRV, Hercus FB: Molecular heterogeneity of mouse duodenal alkaline phosphatase. Biochem J 141:93–101, 1974Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Congdon P, Mason MK, Smith S, Crollick A, Steel A, Littlewood J: Small-bowel mucosa in asymptomatic children with celiac disease. Mucosal changes with gluten-free diets. Am J Dis Child 135:118–121, 1981Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger M. Batt
    • 1
  • Lynn McLean
    • 1
  • Myra W. Carter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary PathologyUniversity of LiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations