Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of the neural defect in a dog with idiopathic megaesophagus

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a dog with megaesophagus, we studied (1) the upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter responses to swallowing, (2) the UES response to intraesophageal balloon distension and acid perfusion, (3) the fasting LES, stomach and upper small bowel motor activity, and (4) the LES response to intraesophageal balloon distension. The findings were compared to those in two normal dogs. In normal dogs, balloon distension (10–40 cc) and acid perfusion (0.1–0.4 N HCl) at 5, 10, and 15 cm distal to the UES produced up to 200% and 100% increases in UES pressure, respectively. Fasting LES activity in these dogs was coupled to the cyclical migrating motor complex (MMC) activity of the stomach and intestine, with phase I, random phase II, and phase III employing 40%, 40%, and 20% of cycle time, respectively. Balloon distension (10–40 cc) at 5, 10, and 15 cm proximal to the LES in phases I, II, and III produced 80–100% relaxation of the sphincter. In the dog with megaesophagus: (1) the UES and LES response to swallowing was normal; (2) balloon distension (10–40 cc) in the upper esophagus produced no significant increase (P>0.05) in UES pressure while acid perfusion (0.1–0.4 N HCl) produced a significant but relatively smaller increase (50%) in UES pressures; (3) phase I MMC activity in this dog was absent or very short in duration (<5% cycle time), the activity mostly alternating between phases II and III (75–80% and 20% cycle time, respectively); and (4) balloon distension in the distal esophagus (up to 80 cc) induced no observable relaxation (<10%) of the LES. Conclusion: The normal UES and LES response to swallowing and the presence of cyclical MMC activity in the LES indicates that the efferent neural pathways, at least to these areas, are intact in the dog with megaesophagus. Absence or decreased response of the UES and LES to intraluminal stimuli suggests that at least the afferent component of the reflex neural pathways is faulty in idiopathic megaesophagus. The location of the defect is yet to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clifford DH: Classification of congenital neuromuscular dysfunction of the canine esophagus. J Am Vet Radiol Soc 17:98–100, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diamant N, Szczepanski N, Mui H: Manometric characteristics of idiopathic megaesophagus in the dog: An unsuitable model for achalasia in man. Gastroenterology 65:216–223, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis FH, Olsen AM: Achalasia of the Esophagus. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffer RE, Valdes-Dapna A, Baue AE: A comparative study of naturally occurring canine achalasia. AMA Arch Surg 95:83–88, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clifford DH, Malek R: Diseases of the canine esophagus due to a prenatal influence. Am J Dig Dis 8:578–602, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne CA, Clifford DH, Jessen C: Hereditary esophageal achalasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 151:572–581, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sokolovsky V: Achalasia and paralysis of the canine esophagus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 151:572–581, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers WA, Fenner WR, Sherding RG: Electromyographic and esophagomanometric finding in clinically normal dogs and dogs with idiopathic megaesophagus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 174:181–183, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey CE, O'Brien JA, Durie VR, Miller DJ: Megaesophagus in the dog. A clinical survey of 79 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 165:443–446, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clifford DH, Waddell ED, Patterson DR, Wilson CF, Thompson HL: Management of esophageal achalasia in minature schnauzers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 161:1012–1021, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boothe HW: Acquired achalasia (megaesophagus) in a dog. Clinical features and response to therapy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 173:756–758, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sternberg JO: Megaesophagus caused by congenital heart disease. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 72:196–197, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gray GW: Acute experiments on neuroeffector function in canine esophageal achalasia. Am J Vet Res 35:1075–1081, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clifford DH, Pursch JG, Mauldir ML: Comparison of motor nuclei of the vagus nerve in dogs with and without esophageal achalasia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 142:878–882, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  15. Strombeck DR, Troya L: Evaluation of lower motor neuron function in two dogs with megaesophagus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 169:411–414, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janssens J, Valembois P, Hellemans J, Vantrappen G, Pelemans W: Studies on the necessity of a bolus for the progression of secondary peristalsis in the canine esophagus. Gastroenterology 67:245–251, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  17. Longhi EH, Jordan PH Jr: Necessity of a bolus for propagation of primary peristalsis in the canine esophagus. Am J Physiol 220:609–612, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janssens J, Valembois P, Vantrappen G, et al: Is the primary peristaltic contraction of the canine esophagus bolus-dependent? Gastroenterology 65:750–756, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vantrappen G, Hellemans J: Diseases of the Esophagus. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clifford DH, Gyorkey F: Myenteric ganglial cells in dogs with and without achalasia of the esophagus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 150:205–211, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerhardt DC, Shuck TS, Bordeaux RA, Winship DH: Human upper esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology 75:268–274, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  22. Knuff TE, Benjamin SB, Castell DO: Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverticulum: A reappraisal. Gastroenterology 82:734–736, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lund WS: A study of the cricopharyngeal sphincter in man and in the dog. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 37:225–246, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hall KE, El-Sharkawy TY, Diamant NE: Vagal control of migrating motor complex in the dog. Am J Physiol 243:G276-G284, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inouye T: Electromyographic investigation of the esophagus in animals. Laryngoscope 76:1502–1519, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diamant N, Szczepanski M, Mui H: Idiopathic megaesophagus in the dog: reasons for spontaneous improvement and a possible method of medical therapy. Can Vet J 15:66–71, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  27. Snape WJ Jr, Matarazzo SA, Cohen S: Effect of eating and gastrointestinal hormones on human colonic myoelectrical and motor activity. Gastroenterology 75:373–378, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  28. You CH, Chey WY: Study of electromechanical activity of the stomach in humans and in dogs with particular attention to tachygastria. Gastroenterology 86:1460–1468, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  29. Freiman JM, El-Sharkawy TY, Diamant NE: Effect of bilateral vagosympathetic nerve blockade on response of the dog upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to intraesophageal distension and acid. Gastroenterology 81:78–84, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  30. Price LM, El-Sharkawy TY, Mui HY, Diamant NE: Effect of bilateral cervical vagotomy on balloon-induced lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in the dog. Gastroenterology 77:324–329, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  31. Itoh Z, Honda R, Aizawa I, Takeuchi S, Hiwatashi K, Couch EF: Interdigestive motor activity of the lower esophageal sphincter in the conscious dog. Am J Dig Dis 23:239–247, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jennenwein HM, Hummelt H, Meyer U, Siewert R, Koch A, Waldeck F: The effect of vagotomy on the resting pressure and reactivity of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in man and dog.In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility. G Vantrappen, HO Agg (eds). Belgium, Typoff, 1975, pp 186–189

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jordan PH Jr, Longhi EH: Relationship between size of bolus and the act of swallowing on esophageal peristalsis in dogs (35683). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 137:868–871, 1971

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    B. J. K. Tan M.D. & N. E. Diamant M.D.

  2. Toronto Western Hospital, Rm. 1212NP, 399 Bathurst Street, M5T 2S8, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    B. J. K. Tan M.D. & N. E. Diamant M.D.

Authors
  1. B. J. K. Tan M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. E. Diamant M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada grant MA3353, and the Elsie Watt Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, B.J.K., Diamant, N.E. Assessment of the neural defect in a dog with idiopathic megaesophagus. Digest Dis Sci 32, 76–85 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296691

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296691

Keywords

Search

Navigation