Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of cholecystectomy on gallbladder bile composition

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human bile samples are commonly used in biliary research; however, the optimal sampling technique is not known. The current study examines whether bile obtained prior to operative manipulation of the gallbladder differs in composition from samples obtained after cholecystectomy. Gallbladder bile samples were obtained from 26 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. An initial sample was obtained prior to manipulation or devascularization of the gallbladder, and a second sample was obtained after the removal of the gallbladder from the operative field. Gallbladder bile pH and total protein were significantly increased in the postcholecystectomy samples. Bile obtained after cholecystectomy also contained significantly less phospholipid. Gallbladder bile cholesterol, total bile acids, bilirubin, ionized and total calcium, cholesterol saturation index, and total lipids were similar between techniques. These results indicate that manipulation of the gallbladder during cholecystectomy produces alterations in gallbladder bile composition. These results also emphasize the need for consistent sampling technique when obtaining samples for biliary research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strasberg SM, Harvey PRC, Hofmann AF: Bile sampling, processing, and analysis in clinical studies. Hepatology 12:176S-182S, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janowitz P, Swobodnik W, Wechsler JG, Zoller A, Kuhn K, Ditschunheit H: Comparison of gallbladder bile and endoscopically obtained duodenal bile. Gut 31:1407–1410, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell BA, Burton AC: Stratification of bile in the gallbladder and cholelithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 88:731–738, 1949

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tera H: Stratification of human gallbladder bilein vivo. Acta Chir Scand 256(suppl):4–85, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dryer RL, Tammes AR, Routh JI: The determination of phosphorus and phosphatase withN-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine. J Biol Chem 255:177–183, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roschlau P, Bernt E, Gruber W: Cholesterol and esterified cholesterol. Methods Enzym Anal 4:1890–1893, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  8. Talalay P: Enzymatic analysis of steroid hormones. Methods Biochem Anal 8:119–143, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carey MC: Critical tables for calculating the cholesterol saturation of native bile. J Lipid Res 19:945–955, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spivak W, Yeuy W: Application of a rapid and efficient h.p.l.c. method to measure bilirubin and its conjugates from native bile and model bile systems. Biochem J 234:101–109, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weinman SA, Reuss L: Na+−H+ exchange at the apical mambrane of the nectarus gallbladder: Extracellular and intracellular pH studies. J. Gen Physiol 80:299–321, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SP, LaMont JT, Carey MC: Role of gallbladder mucus hypersecretion in the evolution of cholesterol gallstones. J Clin Invest 67:1712–1723, 1981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by N.I.H. Grant R29-DK41889 from the National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (K.D.L.) and a Veterans Administration Merit Review (H.A.P.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahrendt, S.A., Magnuson, T.H., Pitt, H.A. et al. Effect of cholecystectomy on gallbladder bile composition. Digest Dis Sci 37, 1232–1235 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296565

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296565

Key Words

Navigation