Skip to main content
Log in

Some observations of the effects of mechanical impedance upon the ultrastructure of the root caps of barley

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The root apex of barley,Hordeum vulgare cv. Proctor, is a structure which undergoes a number of gross morphological and ultrastructural changes from the normal patterns of development when grown under a small degree of applied mechanical constraint (2 × 104 Pa.). The root cap is generally smaller and thus does not confer to the root meristem the same degree of protection as caps growing in an uncompacted medium. Associated with this loss of peripheral cells is a reduction in the volume of mucigel in contact with the root apex.

In many impeded caps, the planes of division in the calyptrogen are often neither transverse nor longitudinal. There is a reduction in both the number of amyloplasts and starch grains per amyloplast in the columella, but any statolith function of these must not be impaired since the root remains geotropically responsive. The patterns of accumulation of polysaccharide in the walls of peripheral cells as a result of Golgi activity are modified by mechanical impedance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audus, L. J., 1962: The mechanism of the perception of gravity by plants. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.XVI. Biological Receptor Mechanisms. 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, P. W., 1975: The Root Cap. In: The development and function of roots (Torrey J. G. andClarkson D. T., eds.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cercek, L., 1970: The effect of X-ray irradiation on regeneration and geotropic function of barley root caps. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.17, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. L., 1973: In: Scanning electron microscopy: principals and methods. (Hayat M. A., ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, M. J., 1974: Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth. Thesis. University of Reading Ph.D.

  • —, 1977: Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in barley, (Hordeum vulgare L.). I. Effects on the elongation and branching of seminal root axes. J. exp. Bot.28, 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlandt, G., 1914: Physiological Plant Anatomy. (Translation of 4th German edition by M.Drummond.) London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, T. H., 1969: Elimination of geotropic responses in roots of cress, (Lepidium sativum) by removal of statolith starch. Physiol. Plant.22, 1251–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juniper, B. E., Pask G., 1973: Directional secretion by the Golgi bodies in Maize root cells. Planta (Berl.)109, 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Roberts, R. M., 1966: Polysaccharide synthesis and the fine structure of root cells. J. Microscopy85, pt. I, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnovsky, M. J., 1965: A formaldehyde/glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.27, 137A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. H., 1956: Permanganate—a new fixative for electron microscopy. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.2, 799.

    Google Scholar 

  • NĚmec, B., 1902: Die Perception des Schwerkraftreizes bei den Pflanzen. Ber. bot. Geo.20, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, E. S., 1963: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.17, 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S. D., 1955: The influence of rooting medium on the structure and development of the root cap in seedlings ofAcer saccharinum. New Phytol.54, 336–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, B., 1967: Studies on the root cap and its significance in gravi-perception. Thesis, University of London. Ph.D.

  • Schuepp, O., 1917: Untersuchungen über Wachstum und Formwechsel von Vegetationspunkten. Jb. wiss. Bot.57, 17–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, A. R., 1969: A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res.26, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. J., Robards, A. W., 1978: The ultrastructural development of mechanically impeded barley roots. Effects on the endodermis and pericycle. Protoplasma95, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —,Goss, M. J., 1977: Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). II. Effects on cell development in seminal roots. J. exp. Bot.28, 1216–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1978: Effects of mechanical impedance on barley roots—changes in ultrastructure. Agric. Res. Coun. Let. Lab. Ann. Rep. 1977, pp. 25–27. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, D., 1974: Amyloplasten und Endomembranen: Das Geoperzeptionssystem der PrimÄrwurzel. Protoplasma79, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, A.J., Robards, A.W. Some observations of the effects of mechanical impedance upon the ultrastructure of the root caps of barley. Protoplasma 101, 61–72 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293435

Keywords

Navigation