References
A. Bhaduri: On the Significance of Recent Controversies on Capital Theory: A Marxian View. Economic Journal79 (1969), S. 532–535.
M. Bruno: Fundamental Duality Relations in the Pure Theory of Capital and Growth. Review of Economic Studies34 (1969), S. 39–53.
E. Burmeister: Synthesizing the Neo-Austrian and Alternative Approaches to Capital Theory: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature (1974), pp. 413–456.
E. Burmeister and K. Kuga: The Factor-Price Frontier, Duality and Joint Production. Review of Economic Studies35 (1970), S. 11–19.
G. C. Harcourt: Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Journal of Economic Literature7 (1969), S. 369–405.
D. J. Harris: Capital, Distribution, and the Aggregate Production Function. American Economic Review63 (1973), S. 100–113.
J. R. Hicks: Capital and Growth. Oxford 1965.
L. Männer: Kapitaltheoretische Untersuchungen zur neoklassischen gesamtwirtschaftlichen Produktionsfunktion. Göttingen 1973.
P. A. Samuelson: Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function. Review of Economic Studies29 (1962), S. 193–206; wieder abgedr. in: P. A. Samuelson: The Collected Scientific Papers, I. Cambridge (Mass.) 1966, S. 325–338.
L. Spaventa: Rate of Profit, Rate of Growth, and Capital Intensity in a Simple Production Model. Oxford Economic Papers, NS 22 (1970), S. 129–147.
Symposium: Paradoxes in Capital Theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics80 (1966), S. 503–583.
P. Weise: Theoretische Grundlagen der mikroökonomischen Verteilungstheorie, Göttingen 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank Ulrich Schlieper for some valuable comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Männer, L., Weise, P. Duality and indeterminacy in the theory of capital and growth. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 35, 43–62 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291802
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291802