Abstract
State governments are becoming increasingly aware that fiscal policy is a method of affecting the aggregate level of economic activity in the state. This study analyzes the economic effects of the balanced budget multiplier within the regional context. Using a simple model of a regional economy, the study shows that factor migration and state-federal tax interactions eliminate the possibility of a balanced budget multiplier for the region. In addition, the impact of policy on employment and disposable personal income, primary indications of regional welfare, may be assymetrical. A series of simulations employing an econometric model of Alaska illustrates the likely magnitude of effects upon a region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alaska Department of revenue. “Revenue Sources FY 1980–82,” January 1981.
Baumol, William J. and Peston, M. H. “More on the Multiplier Effects of a Balanced Budget,”American Economic Review, Vol. 45 (March 1955), pp. 140–148.
Black, Phillip A. “Injection Leakages, Trade Repercussions and the Regional Income Multiplier,”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Nov. 1981), pp. 227–234.
Goldsmith, Oliver S., and Margaret Mogford. “The Relationship Between the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline and State and Local Government Expenditures” prepared for the State of Alaska Pipeline Coordinator's Office, 1981.
Krese, David T., and Daniel A. Seiver. “Planning for a Resource Rich Region: The Case of Alaska,”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 68, No. 2 (May 1978), pp. 99–104.
Musgrave, Richard.The Theory of Public Finance (McGraw Hill: New York), 1959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldsmith, O.S. Simulations of state government fiscal policy: The balanced budget multiplier. Ann Reg Sci 18, 57–65 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291332
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291332