Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some reflections on the current state of the monetarist debate

  • Abhandlungen
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

This paper has surveyed the status of five monetarist propositions. On one of them, the role of money in income changes, there has been a substantial coming together of Keynesians and monetarists, though the gap between them is still major. On the second, the transmission process, the standard Keynesian criticism of monetarism as a “black box” does not seem compelling, though this, of course, does not necessarily imply that the monetarist transmission process is superior to the Keynesian one. Concerning the third issue, the stability of the private sector, neither side is able to make a halfway convincing case; we just do not know the answer. The fourth issue, the use of a money stock target versus an interest rate target, is also an issue about which we know little, though the case for using a money stock target does seem the stronger. Finally, there is the dispute about a monetary growth rate rule. Here, too, the available evidence is far from convincing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Andersen and J. Jordan: Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review50 (1968), November, pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ando, E. C. Brown, R. Solow, and J. Kareken: Lags in Fiscal and Monetary Policy, in: Commission on Money and Credit. New York 1963.

  • V. Argy: Rules, Discretion in Monetary Management, and Short Term Stability, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking3 (1971), pp. 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Attiyeh: Rules vs. Discretion: A Comment, Journal of Political Economy73 (1965), pp. 170–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Barro: Are Government Bonds Net Wealth ?, Journal of Political Economy82 (1974), pp. 1095–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Benishay: A Framework for the Evaluation of Short-Term Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking4 (1972), pp. 779–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Brainard and J. Tobin: Pitfalls in Financial Model Building, American Economic Review58 (1968), pp. 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bronfenbrenner: (1961 a), Statistical Tests of Rival Monetary Rules, Journal of Political Economy69 (1961), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bronfenbrenner: (1961 b), Statistical Tests of Rival Monetary Rules: Quarterly Data Supplement, Journal of Political Economy69 (1961), pp. 621–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Brunner and A. Meltzer: An Aggregative Theory for a Closed Economy, in J. Stein (ed.), Monetarism, Amsterdam 1976.

  • Th. Cargill and R. Meyer: The Time Variation of the Response of Income to Monetary and Fiscal Policy, Review of Economics and Statistics forthcoming 1978.

  • K. Carlson: Economic Goals for 1981: A Monetary Analysis, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Review59 (1977), November, pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Coddington: Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles, Journal of Economic Literature14 (1976), pp. 1258–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ph. Cooper: Development of the Monetary Sector, Prediction and Policy Analysis in the FRB-MIT Model, Lexington, Mass. 1974.

  • G. Corrigan: Income Stabilization and Short-Run Variability in Money, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Monthly Review55 (1973), pp. 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. David and J. Scadding: Private Savings, Ultrarationality, Aggregation, and “Denison's Law”, Journal of Political Economy82 (1974), Pt. I, pp. 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Davidson: A Keynesian View of Friedman's Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis, Journal of Political Economy80 (1972), pp. 864–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dornbusch: Comments, in J. Stein (ed.): Monetarism, Amsterdam 1976.

  • O. Eckstein: Instability of the Private and Public Sectors, Swedish Journal of Economics75 (1973), pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Eisner: A Permanent Income Theory for Investment, American Economic Review57 (1967), pp. 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fand: Monetarism and Fiscalism, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review (1970), pp. 276–307.

  • S. Fisher and J. Ph. Cooper: Stabilization Policy and Lags, Journal of Political Economy81 (1973), pp. 847–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Friedman: Even the St. Louis Model Now Believes in Fiscal Policy, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking9 (1977), pp. 365–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman: The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement, in Milton Friedman, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago 1956.

  • M. Friedman: The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays, Chicago 1969.

  • M. Friedman: Comment on Tobin, Quarterly Journal of Economics84 (1970), pp. 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Friedman: A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis, New York National Bureau of Economic Research, 1971.

  • M. Friedman and A. Schwartz: Money and Business Cycles, Review of Economics and Statistics45 (1963), pp. 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hansen: The American Economy, New York 1957.

  • R. Harrod: Reassessment of Keynes' Views on Money, Journal of Political Economy78 (1970), Pt. 1, pp. 617–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hicks: The Trade Cycle, Oxford 1950.

  • J. Kareken: Discussion, in Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Controlling Monetary Aggregates II: The Implementation, Boston, Mass., Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Keynes: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London 1936.

  • A. Leijonhufvud: On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, New York-Oxford 1968.

  • S. LeRoy and D. Lindsey: Determining the Monetary Instrument. Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System, American Economic Review (1978) forthcoming.

  • R. Lucas: Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique, in: The Phillips Curve and the Labor Market, Amsterdam 1976, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1 pp. 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Marshall: Official Papers, London 1926.

  • Th. Mayer: The Lag in the Effect of Monetary Policy: Some Criticisms, Western Economic Journal5 (1967), pp. 324–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Th. Mayer: Permanent Income, Wealth and Consumption, Berkeley 1972.

  • Th. Mayer: The Structure of Monetarism, Kredit und Kapital8 (1975), pp. 191–218 and 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. McPheters and M. Redman: Rule, Semirule and Discretion During Two Decades of Monetary Policy, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business15 (1975), pp. 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Meigs and W. Wolman: Central Banks and the Money Supply, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review53 (1971), August, pp. 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Minsky: John Maynard Keynes, New York 1975.

  • F. Modigliani: Some Empirical Tests of Monetary Management and of Rules vs. Discretion, Journal of Political Economy72 (1964), pp. 211–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Modigliani: (1977 a), The Monetarist Controversy, or Should we Forsake Stabilization Policies ? American Economic Review67 (1977), pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Modigliani: (1977 b), The Monetarist Controversy, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, Supplement, Spring 1977.

  • D. E. Moggridge and S. Howson: Keynes on Monetary Policy 1910–1946, Oxford Economic Papers26 (1974), pp. 226–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Okun: Comment, Review of Economics and Statistics45 (1963), pp. 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Patinkin: Chicago Tradition, the Quantity Theory, and Friedman, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking1 (1969), pp. 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Patinkin: Keynes' Monetary Thought, Durham 1976.

  • A. W. Phillips: Some Notes on the Estimation of Time-Forms of Reactions in Interdependent Dynamic Systems, Economica23 (1956), pp. 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pierce and Th. Thomson: Controlling the Stock of Money, in Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Controlling Monetary Aggregates II: The Implementation, Boston, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Poole: Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics84 (1970), pp. 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Poole: Benefits and Costs of Stable Money Growth, in Institutional Arrangements and the Inflation Problem, Amsterdam 1976, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy3, pp. 15–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Poole and Ch. Lieberman: Improving Monetary Control, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1972), No. 2, pp. 293–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Popper: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York 1959.

  • D. Starleaf and R. Floyd: Some Evidence With Respect to the Efficacy of Friedman's Monetary Policy Proposals, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking4 (1972), pp. 713–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Tanner: Are the Lags in the Effects of Monetary Policy Variable? Unpublished manuscript, 1977.

  • R. Teigen: A Critical Look at Monetarist Economics, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review54 (1972), January, pp. 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Tobin: Money and Income: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc? Quarterly Journal of Economics84 (1970), pp. 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Tobin: Friedman's Theoretical Framework, Journal of Political Economy80 (1972), pp. 852–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom, Commitee on the Workings of the Monetary System (1959), Report (Radcliffe Report), London, HM Stationery Office.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Thomas Mayer

    Present address: Department of Economics, University of California, 95616, Davis, CA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Thomas Mayer
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Mayer, T. Some reflections on the current state of the monetarist debate. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 38, 61–84 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01290060

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01290060

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation