Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the benefits of urban improvements

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the benefits that arise from urban improvements such as changes in the transportation system or air quality. In general, two types of benefits occur: the direct or user benefits of the improvement and the secondary benefits of changes in land values and housing prices.

Following the work of Mohring it has been widely held that the change in housing prices would be equal to and therefore offset the change in land values. Here it is shown that this result is true only if there are fixed coefficients in the production of housing and an inelastic demand for housing. An urban model without these restrictive assumptions is constructed to show that these secondary effects are not offsetting and cannot be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, R. and T. Crocker. “Air Pollution and Residential Property Values,”Urban Studies, 1971.

  2. Beckmann, M. “On the Distribution of Urban Rent and Residential Density,”Journal of Economic Theory, 1969.

  3. Borukhov, E. “Diseconomies of Scale in Urban Transportation,”Southern Economic Journal, 1971.

  4. Bos, G. and L. Koyck. “The Appraisal of Road Construction Projects: A Practical Example,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 1962.

  5. Capozza, D. “Transportation Cost and the Provision of Urban Governmental Services,”N. E. Regional Science Review, 1972.

  6. Capozza., D. “Transportation and the Urban Economy,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1972.

  7. Freeman, A. M. “Air Pollution and Property Values: A Methodological Comment,”Review of Economics and Statistics.

  8. Friedlaender, A.The Interstate Highway System. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoover, E. M. “Transport Costs and the Spacing of Central Places,”Regional Science Association Papers, 1970.

  10. Mills, E. S. “A Model of Market Areas with Free Entry,”Journal of Political Economy, 1964.

  11. Mills, E. S. “An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area,”American Economic Review, 1967.

  12. Mills, E. S. “Urban Density Functions,”Urban Studies, 1970.

  13. Mills, E. S.Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohring, H. “Land Values and the Measurement of Highway Benefits,”Journal of Political Economy, 1961.

  15. Mohring, H. and H. Williamson. “Scale and ‘Industrial Reorganization’ Economies of Transport Improvements,”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1969.

  16. Muth, R.Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ridker, R. and J. Henning. “The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967.

  18. Rothenberg, J.Economic Evaluation of Urban Renewal. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tinbergen, J. “The Appraisal of Road Construction: Two Calculation Schemes,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 1957.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to Phil Vincent for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capozza, D.R. Measuring the benefits of urban improvements. Ann Reg Sci 9, 46–60 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287424

Keywords

Navigation