Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Small town growth and metropolitan commuting: Evidence from united states daily urban systems

  • Communications
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metropolitan commuting has long been recognized as a major mechanism generating regional population increases. This paper examines the growth of small towns inside and outside the commuting areas of American daily urban systems (DUSs), 1960–1970. Nonparametric statistical procedures are used to test three size groups of small towns for expected increased growth within commuting areas and under the dominance of large DUS centers. National and Mountain states results do not uniformly support the hypothesis of polarized growth. For this decade, metropolitan commuting is only a partial explanation of small town growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister, Geoffrey. “Space-Time Components of Urban Population Change.”Economic Geography 52 (197): 228–240.

  2. Berry, Brian, J. S. “Commuting Patterns: Labor Market Participation and Regional Potentials,”Growth and Change 1 (1970): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —,Growth Centers in the American Urban System. Volume I: Community Development and Regional Growth in the Sixties and Seventies. Volume II: Working Materials on the U.S. Urban Hierarchy and on Growth Center Characteristics, Organized by Economic Region. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, James S. and Ronald L. Mitchelson. “Extended and Internal Commuting in the Transformation of the Intermetropolitan Periphery,”Economic Geography 57 (1981): 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fotheringham, A. S. “Polarised Growth within a Multi-Growth-Centre Environment: A Case Study of the United States 1920–1970,”Environment and Planning A 11 (1979): 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaile, Gary L. “Alternative Spatial Investment Strategies,”Economic Geography 55 (1979): 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meinig, Donald W. “Mormon Culture Region: Strategies and Patterns in the Geography of the American West, 1847–1964,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers 55 (1976): 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morrill, Richard “Stages in Patterns of Population Concentration and Dispersion,”Professional Geographer 31 (1979): 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Plane, David A. “The Geography of Urban Commuting Fields: Some Empirical Evidence from New England,”Professional Geographer 33 (1981): 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taaffe, Edward J., Howard L. Gauthier, and Thomas A. Maraffa. “Extended Commuting and the Intermetropolitan Periphery,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70 (1980): 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Utah, USA

    Elizabeth K. Burns (Assistant Professor) & Richard W. Travis (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Elizabeth K. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard W. Travis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, E.K., Travis, R.W. Small town growth and metropolitan commuting: Evidence from united states daily urban systems. Ann Reg Sci 16, 75–78 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287408

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287408

Keywords

Search

Navigation