Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-disciplinary interpretation of migration: Amenity capitalization in both land and labor markets

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various disciplines have produced models to explain and predict human migration. A model is presented providing a taxonomy through which interdisciplinary insights can be synthesized. The imperfect information view emphasizes the role of wage differentials as representing arbitragible real utility differentials. The perfect information approach holds that wage and rent differentials are compensating differentials, eliminating real utility variation over space. Moreover, markets compress diverse aspects of spatial variation in welfare, otherwise difficult to quantify, into compensating wage and rent differentials. Rents tend to capitalize the variation in a host of amenities, thereby substantially reducing the need for a potential migrant to discover and weight the importance of various amenities. Empirical results are presented which support the latter equilibrium view. Amenities, as proxied by rents, are superior goods, as indicated by net movements toward high rent locations. This suggests the increasing relative importance of amenities as a determinant of migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G. S. “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis.”Journal of Political Economy, Supplement, Part 2, October 1962, Volume 70, no. 5 (October 1962), pp. 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S.Human Capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; distributed by Columbia University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, G. K., C. L. Beale, and E. S. Lee. “Net Migration of the Population 1960–1970 by Age, Sex, and Color.” University of Georgia Printing Department, 1975.

  • Chalmers, J. A. and M. J. Greenwood. “The Economics of the Rural to Urbal Migration Turnaround.”Social Science Quarterly, Volume 61, no. 3 and 4 (December 1980), pp. 524–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V. “A Review and Interpretation of Search Models and Their Applications of Search in the Housing Market.” Paper prepared for a seminar: Mobility, Migration and the Search for Housing, U.C.L.A., May 19, 1980.

  • DeJong, G. F. and J. T. Fawcett “Motivations for Migration: An Assessment and a Value-Expectancy Research Model.” In G. F. DeJong and R. W. Gardner, eds.,Migration Decisionmaking: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981, pp. 13–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway, L. E. “Age and Labor Mobility Patterns.”Southern Economic Journal, Volume 36, no. 2 (October 1969), pp. 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P. E. “A Life-Cycle Empirical Analysis of Migration and Climate by Race.”Journal of Urban Economics, Volume 6, no. 2 (April 1979), pp. 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P. E. “Migration and Climate.”Journal of Regional Science, Volume 20, no. 2 (May 1980), pp. 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P. E. “Migration with a Composite Amenity: The Role of Rents.”Journal of Regional Science, Volume 23, no. 4 (November 1983), pp. 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P. E. and P. Linneman. “Household Migration: Theoretical and Empirical Results.”Journal of Urban Economics, Volume 6, no. 3 (July 1979), pp. 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P. E. and J. Regulska. “Amenities and Migration over the Life-Cycle.” InThe Economics of Urban Amenities. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. “Research on Intenral Migration in the United States: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature, Volume 3, no. 1 (June 1975), pp. 397–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. and D. Sweetland. “The Detgerminants of Migration Between Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas.”Demography, Volume 9 (1972), pp. 665–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. and M. P. Todaro. “Migration, Unemployment, and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis.”American Economic Review, Volume 60, no. 1 (March 1970), pp. 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haurin, D. R. “The Regional Distribution of Population, Migration, and Climate.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (September 1980), pp. 298–308.

  • Roback, J. “Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life.”Journal of Political Economy, Volume 90, no. 6 (December 1982), pp. 1257–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. “Wages-Based Indexes of Urban Quality of Life.” In P. Mieszkowski and M. Straszheim, eds.,Current Issues in Urban Economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. “Investment in Human Capital.”American Economic Review Supplement, Volume 51, no. 1 (March 1961), pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. P. “Migration Theory and Fact: A Review and Bibliography of Current Literature.” InBibliography Series, No. 5. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. A. “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration.”Journal of Political Economy, Supplement, Volume 70, no. 5 (October 1962), pp. 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. “U.S. Census of Population: 1960,” Vol. I, “Charactgeristics of Population.” Part 1, U.S. Summary. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, R. F., III.The Monetary Reward of Migration Within the United States. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1970

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graves, P.E., Sexton, R.L. & Knapp, T.A. A multi-disciplinary interpretation of migration: Amenity capitalization in both land and labor markets. Ann Reg Sci 18, 35–44 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287373

Keywords

Navigation