Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative approaches to the estimation of economic impacts resulting from supply constraints

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standard Leontief input-output approach to estimating the impacts resulting from changes in final demands is inappropriate to apply to cases in which the gross outputs of particular sectors of the economy are constrained because of conditions such as strikes or natural disasters. In this paper two alternative approaches are presented for estimating the impacts on production resulting from supply-constraints. The first is based on standard interindustry purchase coefficients, the second on sales coefficients. Each model is applied in turn to estimate the impact on the Kern County, California economy of a hypothetical curtailment of State-supplied water to the County's agricultural activities. The empirical results, as well as the underlying assumptions, of each approach are compared and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Augustonovics, M. 1970. “Methods of International and Intertemporal Comparison of Structure,” in A. P. Carter and A. Brody (eds.)Contributions to Input-Output Analysis. Amsterdam, 249–269.

  2. Cartwright, J. V., R. M. Beemiller, E. A. Trout, Jr. and J. M. Younger. 1982.Estimating the Potential Impacts of a Nuclear Reactor Accident, Regional Economic Analysis Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U. S. Department of Commerce.

  3. Ghosh, A. 1958. “Input-Output Approach to an Allocative System,”Econo-metrica 25, 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giarratani, F. 1980. “The Scientific Basis for Explanation in Regional Analysis,” The Regional Science Association Papers 45, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giarratani, F. 1976. “Application of an Interindustry Supply Model to Energy Issues,” Environment and Planning 8, 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giarratani, F. 1981. “A Supply-Constrained Interindustry Model Forecasting Performance and an Evaluation,” in W. Buhr and P. Friedrich (eds.)Regional Development Under Stagnation, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellshaft.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kern County Board of Trade. 1982.Statistical and Economic Profile, Kern County. Bakersfield, California.

  8. Lofting, E. M. 1983.An Interindustry Analysis of the Kern County Economy. Berkeley, California: Engineering Economics Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMenamin, G. and J. E. Haring. 1974. “An Appraisal of Non-Survey Techniques for Estimating Regional Input-Output Models,”Journal of Regional Science 14, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noel, J. 1981.San Joaquin District Groundwater Study: San Joaquin Valley. Sacramento: California Department of Water Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stone, R. 1961.Input-Output Models and National Accounts. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. S. Department of Commerce. 1982.Survey of Current Business, 62 (April).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, H.C., Salkin, E.L. Alternative approaches to the estimation of economic impacts resulting from supply constraints. Ann Reg Sci 18, 25–34 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287372

Keywords

Navigation