Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accounting for spatial relationships in models of interstate population migration

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the specification of distance and space in models of state-to-state population migration. Typically, space is captured by one or two simple variables that do not adequately model the spatial relationship between states. These are particularly poor measures for states with a common border, especially those with a metropolitan area located near the border. Four models of interstate population migration are developed, with increasingly complex specifications of space. The models are estimated using 1975 to 1980 migration data for the 48 contiguous states of the United States. Common borders and bordering metropolitan areas do influence interstate population flows. Models lacking a more detailed specification of space will lose explanatory power and suffer from biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batty, M. “Spatial Entropy,”Geographical Analysis, 6 (1974), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batty, M. and P. Sikdar. “Proximate Aggregation-Estimation of Spatial Interaction Models,Environment and Planning A, 16 (1984), 467–486.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beardwood, J. and H. Kirby. “Zone Definition and the Gravity Model: The Separability, Excludability, and Compressibility Properties,”Transportation Research, 9 (1975), 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cebula, R., R. Kohn, and R. Vedder. “Some Determinants of Black Interstate Migration,”Western Economic Journal, 11 (1973), 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cliff, A. and J. Ord. “Model Building and Analysis of Spatial Pattern in Human Geography,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 37 (1975), 297–348.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coombes, M., J. Dixon, J. Goddard, S. Openshaw, and P. Taylor, “Towards a More Rational Consideration of Census Areal Units: Daily Urban Systems in Britain,” Environment and Planning A, 10 (1978), 1179–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallaway, L., R. Gilbert, and P. Smith. “The Economics of Labor Mobility: An Empirical Analysis,”Western Economic Journal, 5 (1968), 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goss, E. and H. Chang. “Changes in Elasticities of Interstate Migration: Implication of Alternative Functional Forms,”Journal of Regional Science, 23 (1983), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood, M. “An Analysis of the Determinants of Geographic Labor Mobility in the United States,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (1969), 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwood, M. and P. Gormely. “A Comparison of the Determinants of White and Nonwhite Interstate Migration,”Demography, 8 (1971), 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herzog, H. and A. Schlottmann. “Migrant Information, Job Search and the Remigration Decision,”Southern Economic Journal, 50 (1983), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kau, J. and C. Sirmans. “New, Repeat, and Return Migration: A Study of Migrant Types,” Southern Economic Journal, 43 (1976), 1144–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Long, J. “The Effects of College and Military Populations on Models of Interstate Migration,”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 17 (1983), 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Openshaw, S. “A Geographical Solution to Scale and Aggregation Problems in Region-Building, Partitioning and Spatial Modeling,”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, new series, 2 (1977), 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Openshaw, S. “An Empirical Study of Some Zone-Design Criteria,”Environment and Planning A, 10 (1978), 781–794.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab, M. and T. Smith, “Functional Invariance under Spatial Aggregation from Continuous Spatial Interaction Models,”Geographical Analysis, 17 (1985), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sjaastad, L. “The Relationship Between Migration and Income in the United States,”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6 (1960), 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steinnes, D. “Aggregation, Gerrymandering, and Spatial Econometrics,”Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10 (1980), 561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wadycki, W. “A Note on Opportunity Costs and Migration Analysis,”Annals of Regional Science, 8 (1974), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wadycki, W. “Alternative Opportunities and Interstate Migration: Some Additional Results,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 6 (1974), 254–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, West Virginia University, 26506-6025, Morgantown, WV, USA

    Brian J. Cushing

Authors
  1. Brian J. Cushing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cushing, B.J. Accounting for spatial relationships in models of interstate population migration. Ann Reg Sci 20, 66–73 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287242

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287242

Keywords

Search

Navigation