Skip to main content
Log in

City-forming propensities in a central place hierarchy: Application of Beckmann-Mcpherson model to the Turkish urban system

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyzes the city-forming propensities, the service factors, in the Turkish central place hierarchy at the regional and national levels. It is built on the premise posited by Christaller that a functional relationship exists between the population of a central place and its complementary area. Following Beckmann and McPherson and utilizing data from a countrywide survey, city-forming propensities are calculated for the sixteen-functional regions and the nation to see whether any systematic variation occurs between the k patterns. The basic Beckmann-McPherson model is modified to take into account of the variable K hierarchy of the Turkish system and the non-central (non-nodal), primarily agricultural, activities in the 1st order central places. To take account of the latter factor, “notional populations” are calculated for the 1st order centers, and these, rather than the actual populations, are used in finding the sets of city-forming propensities. In the 2nd part of the paper, the factors behind the variations between the regional k values are analyzed. Population density, per-capita income and the employment-activity-structure, particularly the extent of manufacturing employment, are found to be the main determinants of the variation in k values both within and between regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckmann, M. J. “City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City size.”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1958, 6, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beckmann, M. J. and J. McPherson. “City Size Distribution in a Central Place Hierarchy.”Journal of Regional Science, 1970, 10, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, Brian J. L., H. Gardiner Barnum and Robert J. Tennant. “Retail Location and Consumer Behaviour.”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 1962, 9, 65–106.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christaller, W. (C. W. Baskin, trans.)Central Places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966.

  5. Dacey, M. “Population of Places in a Central Place Hierarchy.”Journal of Regional Science, 1966, 6, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü (DIE).Genel Nüfüs Saymi İdari Bölünüs, 25.10. 1970 [Census of Population by Administrative Division]. Ankara: Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devlet Istatistik Enstitüsü (DİE).Kirsal Kesim Gelir Dagilimi ve Tüketim Harcamalari;1973–1974 (Income Distribution and Consumption Expenditures in Rural Areas, 1973–1974). Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Yayin no: 881, 1979.

  8. Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü (DİE).Kentsel Yerler Hanehalki Gelir ve Tüketim Harcamalari, 1978–1979 (Urban Places Household Income and Consumption Expenditures Survey Results, 1978–1979). Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Yayin no: 999, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Devlet Planlama Teskilati (DPT). Iller İçin Bir Gelişmislik Göstergesi ve Siralama (A Development Indicator for Provinces and Ordering). Ankara: Başbakanlik Devlet Planlama Teşkilati, DPT: 1695, KÖYD: 19, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devlet Planlama Teskilati (DPT).Türkiye'de Yerleşme Merkezlerinin Kademelenmesi (The Hierarchy of the Settlement Centers in Turkey). Ankara: Başbakanlik Devlet Planlama Teskilati, DPT: 1800, KÖYB: 27, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, F. H. W. “Urban Hinterlands in England and Wales: An Analysis of Bus Services.”Geographical Journal, 1950, 116, 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Green, Howard L. “Hinterland Boundaries of New York City and Boston in Southern New England.”Economic Geography. 1955, 31, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lösch, A. (W. H. Woglom and W. F. Stolper, trans.)The Economics of Location. New Haven, Conn. 1954.

  14. McPherson, J. C. “The Implications of Central Place Theory for Urban Structure in a Declining Region: The North American Experience.”Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1981, 47, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Özütün, Erdoğan.Türkiye Gayrisafi Yurtiçi Hasilasi (Gross Domestic Product of Turkey). Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parr, J. B. “City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City Size: A Reconsideration of Beckmann's Contribution.”Journal of Regional Science, 1969, 9, 239–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parr, J. B. “Models of City Size in an Urban System.”Papers of the Regional Science Association. 1970, 25, 221–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parr, J. B. “Models of the Central Place System: A More General Approach.”Urban Studies, 1978, 15, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parr, J. B., K. G. Denike and G. Mulligan. “City-Size Models and the Economic Base: A Recent Controversy.”Journal of Regional Science, 1975, 15, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Philbrick, Allen K. “Principles of Areal Functional Organization in Regional Human Geography.”Economic Geography, 1957, 33, 299–336.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosen, Kenneth T. and Mitchell Resnick. “The Size Distribution of Cities: An Examination of the Pareto Law and Primacy.”Journal of Urban Economics, 1980, 8, 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suarez-Villa, L. “Rank Size Distribution, City-Size Hierarchies and the Beckmann Model: Some Empirical Results.”Journal of Regional Science, 1980, 20, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tinbergen, J. “The Hierarchy Model of the Size Distribution of Centres.”Regional Science Association Papers, 1967, 20, 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mutlu, S. City-forming propensities in a central place hierarchy: Application of Beckmann-Mcpherson model to the Turkish urban system. Ann Reg Sci 20, 28–43 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287239

Keywords

Navigation