Skip to main content
Log in

Intrastate differences in residential water demand

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, the results of studies which attempted to estimate residential water demand models have varied, but the source of these variations is not evident because the studies have applied different methodologies and data bases to different regions. The purpose of this paper is to develop models of residential water demand for watershed regions and test the null hypothesis that a single model is adequate to explain variations for all of the individual regions. Primary data collected from questionnaires and utility company records is used in a regression analysis to estimate a generalized water demand model for the state as well as one for each of the subregions. The null hypothesis is rejected which indicates that there are other factors which influence the demand for water and the use of a single model could result in biased estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews, Donald R. and Gibbs, Kenneth C., “An Analysis of the Effect of Price on Residential Water Demand: Metropolitan Miami, Florida.”Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 12 (July 1975): 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn, James E. (Unpublished Manuscript), “Methods of Multivariant Analysis.”

  3. Foster, Henry and Beattie, Bruce R., “Urban Residential Demand for Water in the United States,”Land Economics 55 (February 1979): 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gottlieb, Manuel, “Urban Domestic Demand for Water: A Kansas Case Study.”Land Economics 39 (May 1963): 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanke, S. H. and de Mare, L., “Residential Water Demand: A Pooled, Time-Series, Cross-Section Study of Malmo, Sweden,” in Kindler, J. and Russell, C. S. (eds.)Modelling Water Demands, New York: John Wiley & Sons (forthcoming 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanke, S. H. and Mehrez, A., “An Optimal Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Residental Water use Data.”Water Resource Research 15 (Dec. 1979): 1343–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howe, Charles W. and Linaweaver, F. P., “The Impact of Price on Residential Water Demand and Its Relation to System Design and Price Structure.”Water Resource Research 3 (1967): 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seidel, H. F. and Bauman, E. R., “A Statistical Analysis of Water Works Data for 1955.”Journal of American Water Works Association 49 (Dec. 1957): 1531–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sewell, W. R. Derrick and Rouche, Leonard, “Peak Load Pricing and Urban Water Management: Victoria, B.C., A Case Study.”Natural Resources Journal 14 (July 19764): 383–400.

  10. Taylor, L., “The Demand for Electricity: A Survey.”Bell Journal of Economics 6 (1975): 74–110.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turnovsky, Stephen J., “The Demand for Water: Some Empirical Evidence on Consumer Response to a Commodity Uncertain in Supply.”Water Resources Research 5 (April 1969): 350–361.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ware, James E. and North, Ronald M., “Price and Consumption of Water for Residential Use in Georgia.”The Atlantic Economic Review 15 (Oct. 1968): 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wong, S. T., “A Model of Municipal Water Demand: A Case Study of Northeastern Illinois.”Land Economics 48 (Feb. 1972): 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ford, R.K., Ziegler, J.A. Intrastate differences in residential water demand. Ann Reg Sci 15, 20–30 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286329

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286329

Keywords

Navigation