Abstract
In determining metropolitan population size and changes therein, urban theorists traditionally have focused on the number of occupied dwelling units or households and have assumed that these households are equal in size. This paper argues that average household size is an indicator of how intensively the housing stock is utilized and that there is substantial variation in household size across SMSAs in the U.S. The experience of 150 SMSAs is examined for the time period 1960 to 1970. The study model attributes varying household size to differentials in birth and divorce rates, racial composition and age of housing. Ramifications of recent household size declines involve the internal spatial organization of metropolitan areas and the Census controversy with cities over alleged undercounts of urban populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, W.. “A Theory of the Urban Land Market.”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, VI (1960), 149–157.
Carliner, G.. “Determinants of Household Headship.”Journal of Marriage and the Family, XXXVII (1975), 28–38.
Chevan, A. and J. H. Korson. “The Widowed Who Live Alone: An Examination of Social and Demographic Factors.”Social Forces, V (1972), 43–53.
—. “Living Arrangements of Widows in the United States and Israel.”Demography, XII (1975), 505–518.
Glick, P. C. and A. J. Norton. “Martial Instability: Past, Present and Future.”Journal of Social Issues, XXXII (1976), 5–20.
—. “Marriage, Divorce and Living Together.”Population Bulletin, XXXII (1977), 1–41.
Gober, P. “Shrinking Household Size and Its Effects on Urban Population Density Patterns: A Case Study of Phoenix, Arizona,”The Professional Geographer, XXXII (1980), 55–62.
Johnson, D. W., P. R. Ricard and B. Quinn.Churches and Church Membership in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Glenmary Research Center, 1971.
Kobrin, F. E. “Household Headship and its Changes in the United States, 1940–1960, 1970.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, LXVIII (1973), 793–800.
—. “The Fall in Household Size and the Rise of the Primary Individual in the United States.”Demography, 13 (1976), 127–138.
—. “The Primary Individual and the Family: Changes in Living Arrangements in the U.S. Since 1940.”Journal of Marriage and the Family, XXXVIII (1976), 233–239.
Kuznetz, S. “Size and Age Structure of Family Households: Exploratory Comparisons.”Population Development Review, IV (1978), 187–223.
Laslett, B. “Family Membership, Past and Present.”Social Problems, XXV (1978), 476–490.
Michael, R. T., V. R. Fuchs, and S. R. Scott. “Changes in the Propensity to Live Alone: 1950–1976.”Demography, XVII (1980), 39–53.
Muth, R. “Spatial Structure of the Housing Market.”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, VII (1961), 207–220.
—. “The Variation of Population Density and Its Components in South Chicago.”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, XIII (1965), 173–183.
Myers, D. “A New Perspective on Planning for More Balanced Metropolitan Growth.”Growth and Change, IX (1978), 8–13.
Norton, A. J. and P. C. Glick. “What's Happening to Households?”American Demographics, I (1979), 19–22.
Scott, J. W. and L. A. Tilly. “Women's Work and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Europe.”Comparative Studies in Society and History.” XVII (1975), 36–64.
Spicer, J. C. and S. O. Gustavus. “Mormon Fertility Through Half a Century: Another Test of the Americanization Hypothesis.”Social Biology, XXI (1974), 70–76.
Sweet, J. A. “The Living Arrangements of Separated, Widowed and Divorced Mothers.”Demography, IX (1970), 143–157.
—. “Demography and the Family.”Annual Review of Sociology, III (1977), 363–405.
U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Annual Housing Survey, 1974, CHR Series H-171-74, Supplementary Rept. No. 1, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975.
—.Census of Population and Housing, 1960, PHC (1) Nos. 1–177. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1962.
—.Census of Population and Housing, 1970, PHC (1) Nos. 1–238. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972.
—.Current Population Reports. Series P-20, No. 327. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1978.
—.County and City Data Book, 1967. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1967.
—.County and City Data Book, 1972. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1973.
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.Vital Statistics of the United States, 1960. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1962.
—.Vital Statistics of the United States, 1970. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1974.
Wargon, S. L. “Household and Family in Canada: A General Review of Recent Demographic Trends.”International Journal of Sociology of the Family, VIII (1978), 53–68.
Willis, J. “Mormon Fertility and the Americanization Hypothesis: Some Further Comments.”Social Biology, XXII (1975), 282–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gober, P. Falling household size and its effect on metropolitan population growth and density. Ann Reg Sci 15, 1–10 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286327
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286327