Skip to main content
Log in

Urban connectivity in Montana

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Q mode factor analysis is used to isolate the latent structure of the pattern of telephone calls between Montana towns. An eleven axis component solution accounts for 82.6% of the variance of data set and defines a series of nodal regions in the state. A higher order factor analysis is used to generalize these results into second and third order levels of connectivity. Comparison of the first order regions with results derived from Huff's gravity model demonstrates the utility of this theoretical formulation. The overall spatial structure of connectivity bears close relationships with the hierarchical and reciprocal propositions about urban structure formulated by Friedmann but there are a lot of overlapping connections and local distortions which modify the pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, W. R. (1973), “Toward a Factorial Ecology of Flows.”Economic Geography, vol. 49, pp. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, L. and Holmes, J. “The Delimitation of Functional Regions,”Journal of Regional Science, 1 (1971), pp. 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cattell, R. B. (1968), “Higher Order Factor Structures,” in C. Banks and P. L. Broadhurst (eds.),Studies in Psychology: Essays Presented to to Cyril Burt, London.

  4. Clark, D. (1973a), “Normality, Transformation and the Principal Component Solution.”Area, Vol. 5 (2), p. 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, D. (1973b), “The Formal and Functional Structure of Wales,”Annals Assoc. of Am. Geographers, 63, pp. 221–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christaller, W. W. (1932), Translated C. Baskin, 1964),Central Places in S. Germany. Prentice Hall.

  7. Davies, W. K. D. and Barrow, G. (1973), “A Comparative Factorial Ecology of Three Canadian Cities,”Canadian Geographer, 17 (4), pp. 327–357.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies, W. K. D. and Lewis, C. R. (1970), “Regional Structure in Wales,” Chapter 2 inUrban Essays: Studies in the Geography of Wales, Longmans, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, W. K. D. and Musson, T. (1978), Spatial Pattern of Commuting in South Wales, 1951–71."Regional Studies, No. 12, pp. 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies, W. K. D. and Robinson, G. W. S. (1969), “The Nodal Structure of the Solent Region.”Journal, Town Planning Institute, Vol. 54, pp. 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, W. K. D. (1972), “Conurbation and City Region in an Administrative Borderland.”Regional Studies, No. 6, pp. 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, W. K. D. (1978), “Alternative Factorial Methods and Urban Social Structure,”Canadian Geographer, No. 22, 4, pp. 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn, E. S. (1970), “A Flow Network Image of urban Structures,”Urban Studies, Vol. 7 (3).

  14. Friedmann, J. (1972), “A General Theory of Polarized Development,” in N. M. Hansen (ed.),Growth Centres in Regional Economic Development, Free Press, pp. 82–107.

  15. Giggs, J. A. and Mather, P. M. (1975), Factorial Ecology and Factor Invariance.Economic Geography 51 (4), pp. 366–382.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harman, H. H. (1975),Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Revised Edition.

  17. Holmes, J. (1975), “Graph Theory and Transactions Flow Analysis Applied to Flow Matrices.” Mimeo, Department of Geography, University of Queensland.

  18. Hirst, M. A. (1977), “Hierarchical Aggregation Procedures for Interaction Data: A Comment,”Environment and Planning A, Vol. 9, pp. 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Horton, F. (1966), in Leopold L. B. et al.Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, Freeman, pp. 131–150.

  20. Huff, D. (1973), “The Delimitation of a National System of Planning Regions ...”Regional Studies, 7 pp. 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Illeris, S. and Pederson, P. O. (1968), “Central Places and Functional Regions in Denmark: A Factor Analysis of Telephone Traffic,”Land Studies in Geography, Series B, No. 31.

  22. Nie, N., Brent, D. H. et al. (1975),Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, McGraw Hill, New York, Revised edition.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nystuen, J. D. and Dacey, M. F. (1961), “A Graphy Theory Interpretation of Nodal Regions.”Papers, Regional Science Association 7, pp. 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pred, A. (1975), “Systems of Cities,”Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, 38, pp. 9–82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Preston, R. E. (1972), “The Structure of Central Place Systems,”Economic Geography, 48, pp. 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rummel, R. J. (1971),Applied Factor Analysis, Northwestern University Press.

  27. Soja, E. W. (1968), “Communications and Territorial Integration in East Africa,”East Lakes Geographer 4 (1968), pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson, R R. and Davies, W. K. D. (1977), Dyadic Factor Analysis and the Prairie Urban System. Paper presented at C.A.G. Annual Meeting (Regina), 1977.

  29. Webber, M. (1964), “The Urban Place and Non Place Urban Realm,” in M. Webber, et al. (ed.)Explorations Into Urban Structure, Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The assistance provided by Miss Beverly Borden, M. A., in carrying out the initial processing of the data matrix using orthogonal rotation is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support was provided through the University of Calgary Research Grants Committee, Grant No. 14075.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, W.K.D. Urban connectivity in Montana. Ann Reg Sci 13, 29–46 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284778

Keywords

Navigation