Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation in urban systems: The interrelationships between urban and national economic development

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theoretical basis for analysing the role of innovation in economic development is assessed, as is the application of such theories to urbanisation processes. It is concluded that innovation lies at the heart of economic development and that urban development has important feedback effects on national economic development. Analysing these feedbacks requires a sophisticated data set allowing the analysis of input-output relationships in urban systems over time. In the absence of such data, industry employment classifications are used as a proxy for economic structure in an analysis of United States and Australian cities. Particular kinds of cities in the urban hierarchy can be analysed in terms of their economic structure and this can then be related to national economic development trends. The contributions of categories of city (particularly by size class) to economic development can then be explored. Obviously, results will vary with the era of economic development covered by the data. However, in all eras, certain kinds of cities will emerge as leaders in the process of urban economic development and will also play a crucial role in national economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso, W., “The Economics of Urban Size,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, 26, 1971, pp. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, A. and Johansson, B., “Knowledge Intensity and Product Cycles in Metropolitan Regions,’Contributions to the Metropolitan Study: Number 8, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (I.I.A.S.A.), February, 1984.

  3. Aurora, S. S. & Brown, M., “Alternative Approaches to Spatial Autocorrelation: An Improvement Over Current Practice,”International Regional Science Review, 2, Fall 1977, pp. 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, B. J. L., “Hierarchical Diffusion: The Basis of Development Filtering & Spread in a System of Growth Centres” in Hansen, N. M. (ed.)Growth Centres in Regional Economic Development, Free Press, New York, 1972, pp. 108–138.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boulding, K. E., “Towards a General Theory of Growth,” reprinted in Spengler, J. J. & Duncan, O. D., (ed.)Population Theory & Policy, The Free Press, New York, 1956, pp. 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, Anne P.,Structural Change in the American Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, Kingsley, “The Urbanisation of the Human Population,” in Scientific America,Cities, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fourastie, J.,Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siecle, Gallimand, Paris, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs, V. R., Differentials in Hourly Earnings by Region & City Size, 1959, National Bureau of Economic Research,Occasional Paper No. 101, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagerstrand, T.,Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process, University Press, Chicago, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoch, I., “Income & City Size,”Urban Studies, 9, 1972, pp. 299–328.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson, B. and Holmberg, I., “A Regional Study of the Distribution of Vintages and Profits of Industrial Establishments: A Stochastic Transition Model,” in M. Albego, A. E. Andersson and F. Snickars (eds.)Regional Development Modelling; Theory and Practice, North-Holland, 1982.

  13. Hodge, G.,Theory & Reality of Industrial Location in the Toronto Region, Report to the Regional Development Branch, Department of Treasury & Economics, Ontario, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy, C. & Thirlwall, A. P., “Surveys in Applied Economics: Technical Progress,”Economic Journal, Vol. LXXXII, Pt. 1, March, 1972, pp. 11–72.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuznets, S., “Consumption, Industrialization and Urbanisation,” in Hoselitz and More (eds.)Industrialisation and Society, Mouton, Unesco, 1963.

  16. Lampard, E. E., “Historical Aspects of Urbanisation,” in Hauser, P. M. & Schnore, L. F. (eds.),The Study of Urbanisation, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965, pp. 519–554.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Little, F. M. and Carter, R. A.,Urban Development, Economic Development and Growth, Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works, Melbourne, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, B. C.,Quality of Life Indicators in the U.S. Metropolitan Areas 1970, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malecki, E. J., “Locational Trends in R. + D. by Large U.S. Corporations,”Economic Geography, Vol. 55, 1979, pp. 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mansfield, E.,The Economics of Technological Change, W. Norton, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nijkamp, P. and Schubert, U., “Structural Change in Urban Systems,”Contributions to the Metropolitan Study: Collaborative Paper 5, I.I.A.S.A., November 1983.

  22. Norton, R. D.,City Life Cycles and American Urban Policy, Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ornati, O. A., “Poverty in Cities,” in Perloff, H. S. & Wingo, L. (eds.)Issues in Urban Economics, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Piore, M. J., “The Impact of the Labor Market Upon the Design & Selection of Productive Techniques within the Manufacturing Plant,”Quarterly Journal of Economics. November 1968, pp. 602–620.

  25. Pred, A.,City Systems in Advanced Economics, Hutchinson, London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, H. W.,The Economics of Urban Size, Saxon House, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —,Regional Growth Theory, Macmillan, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —,Regional & Urban Economics, Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rust, E.,No Growth: Impacts on Metropolitan Areas, D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington, Mass., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Salter, W. E. G.,Productivity & Technical Change, Cambridge University Press, 1966, 2nd Edition.

  31. Schumpeter, J. A.,The Theory of Economic Development, George Allen and Unwin, London, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stanback, T. M. & Knight, R. V.,The Metropolitan Economy: The Process of Employment Expansion, Columbia University Press, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sternlieb, G. and Hughes, J. W.,Post-Industrial America: Metropolitan Decline & Inter-Regional Job Shifts, Centre for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sveikauskas, L., “Productivity and City Size,”Journal of Political Economy, 1976, pp. 30–50.

  35. Temin, P., “A New Look at Hunter's Hypothesis About the Ante-Bellum Iron Industry,”American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings, May, 1964.

  36. Thompson, W. R., “The Urban Development Process,” in H. J. Bryce (ed.)Small Cities in Transition, Ballinger, Cambridge, 1977, pp. 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programme in Urban and Regional Economics Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Robert A. Carter

Authors
  1. Robert A. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, R.A. Innovation in urban systems: The interrelationships between urban and national economic development. Ann Reg Sci 22, 66–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283653

Keywords

Search

Navigation