Skip to main content
Log in

The incubator hypothesis: Re-vitalization of metropolitan areas?

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper spatial and temporal dimensions of technical innovations will be dealt with in both a theoretical and an empirical sense. In this framework, a first aim is to make a systematic typology of different innovations. As far as the regional context is concerned, a theoretical framework will be designed for identifying which regions will most likely “specialize” in certain kinds of innovations. In this respect, our analytical framework can ascertain, for example, whether the central (metropolitan) areas tend to be in a favourable position regarding high quality product innovations, while the more peripheral zones will be more oriented towards process innovations. These hypotheses are then tested, using industrial survey data, by means of contingency table and regression analysis. In general, the empirical results give (some) support to the above mentioned “spatial specialization” hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, A. E., and B. Johansson (1984), Knowledge Intensity and Product Cycles in Metropolitan Regions, Contributions to the Metropolitan Study, no. 8, Laxenburg.

  2. Aydalot, Ph. (1984), Reversals of Spatial Trends in French Industry since 1974. In: J. G. Lambooy (ed.),New Spatial Dynamics and Economic Crisis, pp. 41–63, Finn Publ., Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braverman, H. (1974),Labor and Monopoly Capitalism, Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Camagni, R. (1984), Spatial Diffusion of Pervasive Process Innovation Paper prepared for the XXIV European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Milan.

  5. Davelaar, E. J. and P. Nijkamp (1986), De Stad als Broedplaats van Nieuwe Activiteiten: Theorie en Onderzoek,Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, no. 2, pp. 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elger, A., and H. Braverman (1983), Capital Accumulation and Deskilling,The Degradation of Work? (S. Wood, ed.), Hutchinson, London, pp. 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feller, I. (1973), Determinants of the Composition of Urban Inventions,Economic Geography, vol. 49, pp. 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, C. (ed.) (1984),Design, Innovation and Long Cycles in Economic Development, Design Research Publ., Royal College of Art, London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagerstrand, T. (1967),Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoogteijling, E., J. W. Gunning and P. Nijkamp (1986), Spatial Dimensions of Innovation and Employment: Some Dutch Results, In:Technological Change, Employment and Spatial Dynamics (P. Nijkamp, ed.), pp. 221–243, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoover, E. M. and R. Vernon (1959),Anatomy of a Metropolis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howells, J. R. L. (1984), The Location of Research and Development: Some Observations and Evidence from Britain,Regional Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs, J. (1961),The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Vintage Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kleinknecht, A. (1986),Crisis and Prosperity in Schumpeterian Innovation Patterns, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleinknecht, A. and A. Mouwen (1985), Regionale Innovatie (R&D): Verschuiving naar de ‘Halfwegzone’? In:Innovatie en regio, W. T. M. Molle (ed.), pp. 125–142, Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koerhuis, H. and W. Cnossen (1982), De Softwareen Computer-servicebedrijven, Sociaal Geografische Reeks no. 23, Geografisch Instituut R. U. Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kok, J. A. A. M., G. J. D. Offerman and P. H. Pellenbarg (1984), Innovatieve Bedrijven in Nederland, Sociaal Geografische Reeks no. 32, Geografisch Instituut R. U. Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leone, R. A. and R. Struyk (1976), The Incubator Hypothesis: Evidence from Five SMSA's,Urban Studies, vol. 13, pp. 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malecki, E. J. (1979), Corporate Organization of R and D and the Location of Technological Activities,Regional Studies, vol. 14, pp. 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malecki, E. J. and P. Varaiya (1985), Innovation and Changes in Regional Structure,Handbook of Regional Economics, (P. Nijkamp, ed.), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mensch, G. (1979),The Stalemate Technology, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson, R. D. and S. G. Winter (1982),An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nijkamp, P. (ed.) (1986),Technological Change, Employment and Spatial Dynamics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Norton, R. D. (1979),City Life Cycles and American Urban Policy, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oakey, R. P. (1981),High Technology Industry and Industrial Location, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oakey, R. P., A. T. Thwaites and P. A. Nash (1980), The Regional Distribution of Innovative Manufacturing Establishments in Britain,Regional Studies, vol. 14, pp. 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pred, A. (1977),City Systems in Advanced Economies, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sabal, C. (1982),Work and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thwaites, A. (1982), Some Evidence of Regional Variations in the Introduction and Diffusion of Industrial Products and Processes within British Manufacturing Industry,Regional Studies, vol. 16, pp. 357–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO), project number 46-155.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davelaar, E.J., Nijkamp, P. The incubator hypothesis: Re-vitalization of metropolitan areas?. Ann Reg Sci 22, 48–65 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283652

Keywords

Navigation