Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare-maximizing location versus profit-maximizing location

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop a welfare-maximizing location model for a regulated firm and then to compare it with a profit-maximizing model as set forth by previous location theorists. It will be shown that two otherwise identical firms harboring different objectives will have different patterns of industrial location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckmann, M. J., “Spatial Price Policies Revisited,”Bell Journal of Economics 7 (1976), 619–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradfield, M., “A Note on Location and Theory of Production,”Journal of Regional Science 11 (1971), 263–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denike, K. G. and J. B. Parr, “Production in Space, Spatial Competition and the Restricted Entry,”Journal of Regional Science, 10 (1970), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emerson, D. T., “Optimum Firm Location and the Theory of Production,”Journal of Regional Science 13 (1973), 335–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eswaran, M., Y. Kanemoto and D. Ryan, “A Dual Approach to the Locational Decision of the Firm,”Journal of Regional Science 21 (1981), 469–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holahan, W. L., “The Welfare Effects of Spatial Price Discrimination,”American Economic Review 65 (1975), 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holahan, W. L., “Spatial Monopolistic Competition versus Spatial Monopoly,”Journal of Economic Theory 18 (1978), 156–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu Song-ken and Chao-cheng Mai, “Production Location and Random Input Price,”Regional Science and Urban Economics 14 (1984), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khalili, A., V. K. Mathur and D. Bodenhorn, “Location and Theory of Production: A Generalization,”Journal of Economic Theory 9 (1974), 467–75.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Launhardt, W.,Mathematische Begründung der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mai, Chao-cheng, “Optimum Location and the Theory of the Firm Under Demand Uncertainty,”Regional Science and Urban Economics 11 (1981), 549–57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mai, Chao-cheng, “Location and the Theory of the Imperfectly Competitive Firm Under Demand Uncertainty,”Southern Economic Journal 50 (1984), 1160–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinich, J. S. and Arthur P. Hurter, Jr., “Price Uncertainty and the Optimal Production-Location Decision,”Regional Science and Urban Economies 12 (1982), 509–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mathur, V. K., “Some Unresolved Issues in the Location Theory of the Firms,”Journal of Urban Economics 5 (1979), 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mathur, V. K., “Location Theory of the Firm Under Price Uncertainty,”Regional Science and Urban Economics 50 (1984), 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, S. M. and D. M. Jensen, “Location and the Theory of Production: A Review, Summary and Critique of Recent Contributions,”Regional Science and Urban Economics 8 (1978), 117–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moses, L. N., “Locaiton and the Theory of Production,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 72 (1958), 259–72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norman, G., “Spatial Competition and Spatial Price Discrimination,”Review of Economic Studies 48 (1981), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakashita, N., “Production Function, Demand Function and Location Theory of the Firm,”Papers of Regional Science Association 20 (1967), 109–22.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sakashita, N., “The Location Theory of Firm Revisited-Impacts of Rising Energy Prices,”Regional Science and Urban Economics 10 (1980), 423–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stern, N., “The Optimal Size of Market Areas,”Journal of Economic Theory, 4 (1973), 154–173.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber, A.,Theory of the Location of Industries, Translated by C. J. Friedrich, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woodward, R. S., “The Iso-Outlay Function and Variable Transport Costs,”Journal of Regional Science 13 (1973), 349–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Professors Curtis Eaton and Stuart Mestelman for useful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, H., Mai, Cc. Welfare-maximizing location versus profit-maximizing location. Ann Reg Sci 20, 54–64 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283623

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283623

Keywords

Navigation