Skip to main content
Log in

Attribute preferences and the non-metropolitan migration decision

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interviews with recent migrants to several small non-metropolitan places elicited attributes of ideal, origin and chosen settlements. Their responses permitted construction of simple measures or valuations of economic, social, individual and environmental aspects of ideal, origin and destination. From these it was possible to evaluate the critical components of the migration decision, to estimate tradeoffs between economic and non-economic benefits, and to distinguish between probable movers and non-movers.

Methods used included content analysis of lengthy recorded interviews, variance-covariance analysis of responses and logit analysis to distinguish movers and non-movers. The majority of respondents were characterized as very negative about life in the cities, where most had moved from, and as positive about both the social and environmental characteristics of their new communities. Economic concerns were of lesser significance to the migrants than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein,Understanding Attitudes on Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, 1981.

  2. Bach, Robert and Joel Smith, “Community Satisfaction, Expectations of Moving and Migration,”Demography 14 (1977) 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwood, L. G. and Carpenter, E. H., “The Importance of Anti-Urbanism in Determining Residential Preferences and Migration Patterns,”Rural Sociology 43 (1978) 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, Larry and Eric Moore, “The Intra-Urban Migration Process,”Geografiska Annaler 52B (1970) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brummell, A. C., “A Method of Measuring Residential Stress,”Geographical Analysis 3, 1981, 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brummell, A. C., “A Model of Intra-Urban Mobility,”Economic Geography 55 (1979) 338–352.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christenson, James et al., “Proruralism Values and Migration Behavior,”Population and Planning 6 (1983) 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, W. A. V. et al., “Calibration Model of the Decision to Move,”Environment and Planning 11 (1979) 689–704.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeJong, Gordon,Migration Decision Making, Pergamon, 1981. See especially: DaVanzo, Julie, “Microeconomic Approaches to Studying Migration Decisions,: 90–129; DeJong, G. and J. Fawcett, “Motivations for Migration: An Assessment and A Value-Expectancy Research Model,” 13–58.

  10. Downing, Barbara Jeanne, “Non-Metropolitan Migration in the Context of Cultural Change and Social Structure,” Dissertation, University of Washington, 1983.

  11. Fabricant, R. A., “An Expectational Model of Migration,”Journal of Regional Science 10 (1970) 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frederickson et al., “Residential PReferences in a Model of Migration Intentions,”Population and Environment 3 (1980) 280–297.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon, I., “Analysis of Motivation Specific Migration Streams,”Environment and Planning 14 (1982) 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heaton, Tim et al., “Residential PReferences, Community Satisfaction and Intention to Move,”Demography (1979), 565–573.

  15. Ilvento, T. W. and A. E. Luloff, “Anti-urbanism and Non-metropolitan Growth,”Rural Sociology 47 (1982) 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leon, William, “Place Image Choice: The Central Place of Images on Migration Decision-Making,” Dissertation, University of Washington, 1984.

  17. Liu, Ben-chieh, “Differential Net Migration Rates and the Quality of Life,”Review of Economics and Statistics 57 (1975) 324–337.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McHugh, Kevin, “Explaining Migration Intentions and Destination Selection,”Professional Geographer 36 (1984) 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michelson, W.,Environmental Choice, Human Behavior and Residential Satisfaction, Oxford, 1977.

  20. Neff, James and Robert Constantine, “Community Dissatisfaction, and Perceived Residential Alternatives,”Journal of Population 2 (1979) 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen, Nghiep, H. Herzog and A. Schlottman, “Earnings Expectations and the Role of Human Capital in the Migration Decision,”Review of Regional Studies 11 (1981) 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quigley, J. and D. Weinberg, “Intraresidential Mobility,”International Regional Science Review 2 (1977) 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roseman, C., “Labor Force and Non Labor Force Migration and Non-employment Reasons,”Socioeconomic and Planning Sciences 17 (1983) 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roseman, Curt and J. D. Williams, “Metropolitan to Nonmetropolitan Migration: A Decisionmaking Perspective,”Urban Geography 1 (1980) 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi, Peter, Why People Move, 2nd edition. Beverly Hills: Sage 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sell, R. R. and DeJong, G., “Deciding Whether to Move: Mobility, Wishful Thinking and Adjustment,”Sociology and Social Research 67 (1983) 146–155.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Serow, W., “Role of Long Distance Migration in Rural Renaissance,”Review of Regional Studies 10 (1980) 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Simon, H., “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment,” Psychological Review 63 (1956) 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speare, Alden, Sidney Goldstein, and William Frey,Residential Mobility, Migration and Metropolitan Change, Ballinger, 1975.

  30. Toney, M. B., “The Simultaneous Examination of Economic and Social Factors in the Destination Selection,”Demography 15 (1976) 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weinstein, E. T. and Evans, “Probability Income Maximizing Behavior in Regional Migration,”Review of Regional Studies 10 (1980) 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williams, J. D. and A. Sofranko, “Motivations for the In-Migration Component of Population Turnarounds in Nonmetropolitan Areas,”Demography 16 (1979) 234–250.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wolpert, Julian, “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate,”Papers, Regional Science Association 5 (1965) 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation. The analyses reported herein were based on the data as compiled by Jeanne Downing [10] and William Leon [16].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrill, R., Downing, J. & Leon, W. Attribute preferences and the non-metropolitan migration decision. Ann Reg Sci 20, 33–53 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283622

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283622

Keywords

Navigation