Summary
The unbranched ectoplasmic cylinder of monotacticA. proteus is always retracted toward the cell-substrate attachment sites. The retraction velocity increases from the adhesion sites toward any free distal body end in a linear way, which indicates the uniform contractility of the whole cylinder. Therefore, in the cells frontally attached all the ectoplasm moves forward, and in those adhering by the tail the whole ectoplasmic tube moves backward producing the full fountain phenomenon. With cell attachment at the middle body regions, which is most typical for normal locomotion, the whole ectoplasm is centripetally retracted from both body poles toward the adhesion zone, producing then the tail retraction in the posterior and incomplete fountain in the anterior body part. In unattached amoebae the whole peripheral tube is retracted toward its geometrical centre which coincides with its posterior closed end, producing therefore also a full fountain. It is generalized that the fountain arises always between an unattached front and the nearest attachment point behind its manifestation zone. The photographic records of movement and longitudinal velocity profiles of ectoplasmic retraction are identical on both sides of the attachment points, suggesting the same mechanism for the fountain movement as for the tail withdrawal. It is concluded therefore that not the axial endoplasmic arm of the fountain is active, but its peripheral arm built of the ectoplasm.
All elements complicating the cell contour, as the constriction rings and ephemeral lateral pseudopodia, do not change their position in respect to the ectoplasmic material, but move together with it in respect to the substrate, i.e., the cytoskeleton moves as a whole. Loose glass rods attached by adhesion to cell surface also precisely follow the cytoskeleton movements, being transported toward the main locomotory adhesion zone established on the firm substrate, although the cell membrane as such behaves differently. It suggests a direct connection between the adhesion sites and the cytoskeleton.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. D., 1961 a: Ameboid movement. In: The cell, Vol. 2 (Brachet, J., Mirsky, A. E., eds.), pp. 135–216. New York-London: Academic Press.
—, 1961 b: A new theory of amoeboid movement and endoplasmic streaming. Exp. Cell Res. (Suppl.)8, 17–31.
—, 1973: Biophysical aspects of pseudopodium formation and retraction. In: The biology of amoeba (Jeon, K. W., ed.), pp. 201–247. New York-London: Academic Press.
—,Allen, N. S., 1978: Cytoplasmic streaming in amoeboid movement. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.7, 469–495.
—,Cooledge, J. W., Hall, P. J., 1960: Streaming in cytoplasm dissociated from the giant amoeba,Chaos chaos. Nature187, 896–899.
—,Taylor, D. L., 1975: The molecular basis of ameboid movement. In: Molecules and cell movement (Inoue, S., Stevens, R. E., eds.), pp. 239–258. New York: Raven Press.
Condeelis, J. S., Taylor, D. L., 1977: The contractile basis of ameboid movement. V. The control of gelation, solation, and contraction in extracts fromDictyostelium discoideum. J. Cell Biol.74, 901–927.
Czarska, L., Grębecki, A., 1966: Membrane folding and plasmamembrane ratio in the movement and shape transformation inAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.4, 201–239.
De Bruyn, P. P. H., 1946: The amoeboid movement of the mammalian leukocytes in tissue cultures. Anat. Rec.95, 177–192.
Gawlitta, W., Stockem, W., Wehland, J., Weber, K., 1980: Organization and spatial arrangement of fluorescein-labeled native actin microinjected into normal locomoting and experimentally influencedAmoeba proteus. Cell Tiss. Res.206, 181–191.
Grębecka, L., 1978 a: Frontal cap formation and origin of monotactic forms ofAmoeba proteus under culture conditions. Acta Protozool.17, 191–202.
—, 1978 b: Micrurgical experiments on the frontal cap of monotactic forms ofAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.17, 203–212.
—, 1981: Motory effects of perforating peripheral cell layers ofAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma106, 343–349.
—,Grębecki, A., 1975: Morphometric study of movingAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.14, 337–361.
— —, 1981: Testing motor functions of the frontal zone in the locomotion ofAmoeba proteus. Cell Biol. Internat. Rep.5, 587–594.
—,Hrebenda, B., 1979: Topography of cortical layer inAmoeba proteus as related to the dynamic morphology of moving cell. Acta Protozool.18, 493–502.
Grębecki, A., 1976: Co-axial motion of the semi-rigid cell frame inAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.15, 221–248.
—, 1977: Non-axial cell frame movements and the locomotion ofAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.16, 53–85.
—, 1979: Organization of motory functions in amoebae and in slime moulds plasmodia. Acta Protozool.18, 43–58.
—, 1981: Effects of localized photic stimulation on amoeboid movement and their theoretical implications. Eur. J. Cell Biol.24, 163–175.
—, 1982 a: Études expérimentales sur la localisation des fonctions motrices chez les amibes. Année Biol.21, 275–306.
- 1982 b: Supramolecular aspects of amoeboid movement. In: Progress in protozoology. Proc. VI Internat. Congr. Protozool., part 1, pp. 117–130.
—,Grębecka, L., 1978: Morphodynamic types ofAmoeba proteus: a terminological proposal. Protistologica14, 349–358.
— —,Kłopocka, W., 1981: Testing steering functions of the frontal zone in the locomotion ofAmoeba proteus. Cell Biol. Internat. Rep.5, 595–600.
Haberey, M., Wohlfarth-Bottermann, K. E., Stockem, W., 1969: Pinocytose und Bewegung von Amöben. VI. Kinematographische Untersuchungen über das Bewegungsverhalten der Zelloberfläche vonAmoeba proteus. Cytobiologie1, 70–84.
Hauser, M., 1978: Demonstration of membrane-associated and oriented microfilaments inAmoeba proteus by means of a Schiff base/glutaraldehyde fixative. Cytobiologie18, 95–106.
Hellewell, S. B., Taylor, D. L., 1979: The contractile basis of ameboid movement. VI. The solation-contraction coupling hypothesis. J. Cell Biol.83, 633–648.
Holtfreter, J., 1948: Significance of the membrane in embryonic processes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.49, 709–760.
Hrebenda, B., Grębecka, L., 1978: Ultrastructure of the frontal cap of monotactic forms ofAmoeba proteus. Cytobiologie17, 62–72.
Hyman, L. H., 1917: Metabolic gradients inAmoeba and their relation to the mechanism of amoeboid movement. J. exp. Zool.24, 55–99.
Ishii, K.,Kanno, F., 1977: An analysis of movement in amoeba ectoplasm. Private print distributed at the V Internat. Congr. Protozool., New York.
Jahn, T. L., 1964: Relative motion inAmoeba proteus. In: Primitive motile systems in cell biology (Allen, R. D., Kamiya, N., eds.), pp. 279–302. New York-London: Academic Press.
Kane, R. E., 1976: Actin polymerization and interaction with other proteins in temperature-induced gelation of sea urchin eggs. J. Cell Biol.71, 704–714.
Kanno, F., 1965: An analysis of amoeboid movement. IV. Cinematographic analysis of movement of granules with special reference to the theory of amoeboid movement. Annot. Zool. Jap.38, 45–63.
—, 1969: Movement of plasmalemma in ameba. Symp. Soc. Chem.19, 57–63.
Käppner, W., 1961: Bewegungsphysiologische Untersuchungen an der AmoebeChaos chaos L. I. Der Einfluß des pH des Mediums auf das bewegungsphysiologische Verhalten vonChaos chaos L. Protoplasma53, 81–105.
Korohoda, W., 1970: Locomotion ofAmoeba proteus in conditions immitating its natural environment. Folia Biol.18, 145–152.
—,Stockem, W., 1975: On the nature of hyaline zones in the cytoplasm ofAmoeba proteus. Microsc. Acta77, 129–141.
— —, 1976: Two types of hyaline caps, constricting rings and the significance of contact for the locomotion ofAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.15, 179–185.
Kuroda, K., 1979 a: Movement of demembranated slime mould cytoplasm. Cell Biol. Internat. Rep.3, 135–140.
—, 1979 b: Movement of cytoplasm in a membrane-free system. In: Cell motility: molecules and organization (Hatano, S., Ishikawa, H., Sato, H., eds.), pp. 347–361. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Lewis, W. H., 1939: The role of a superficial plasmagel layer in changes of form, locomotion and division of cells in tissue cultures. Arch. exp. Zellforsch.23, 1–7.
Mast, S. O., 1926: Structure, movement, locomotion and stimulation inAmoeba. J. Morphol.41, 347–425.
Nowakowska, G., 1978: Twisting of suspended monotactic specimens ofAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool.17, 347–352.
Pantin, C. F. A., 1923: On the physiology of amoeboid movement. J. Marine Biol. Assoc.13, 24–69.
Rinaldi, R. A., 1963: Velocity profile pictographs of amoeboid movement. Cytologia28, 417–424.
—, 1964: Pictographs and flow analysis of the hyaline cap inChaos chaos. Protoplasma58, 603–620.
—,Hrebenda, B., 1975: Oriented thick and thin filaments inAmoeba proteus. J. Cell Biol.66, 193–198.
—,Jahn, T. L., 1963: On the mechanism of ameboid movement. J. Protozool.10, 344–357.
Schulze, F. E., 1875: Rhizopodenstudien. Arch. Mikr. Anat.11, 329–353.
Seravin, L. N., 1966 a: Monopodial forms ofAmoeba proteus (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR166, 1472–1475.
Seravin, L. N., 1966 b: Ameboid locomotion. I. Arrest and resumption of the ameboid locomotion under some experimental conditions (in Russian with English summary). Zool. Zhurn.45, 334–341.
Stockem, W., Hoffmann, H. U., Gawlitta, W., 1982: Spatial organization and fine structure of the cortical filament layer in normal locomotingAmoeba proteus. Cell Tiss. Res.221, 505–519.
— —,Gruber, B., 1983 a: Dynamics of the cytoskeleton inAmoeba proteus. I. Redistribution of microinjected fluorescein labeled actin during locomotion, immobilization and phagocytosis. Cell Tiss. Res.232, 79–96.
—,Naib-Majani, W., Wohlfarth-Bottermann, K. E., Osborn, M., Weber, K., 1983 b: Pinocytosis and locomotion of amoebae. XIX. Immunocytochemical demonstration of actin and myosin inAmoeba proteus. Eur. J. Cell Biol.29, 171–178.
—,Weber, K., Wehland, J., 1978: The influence of microinjected phalloidin on locomotion, protoplasmic streaming and cytoplasmic organization inAmoeba proteus andPhysarum polycephalum Cytobiologie18, 114–131.
—,Wohlfahrt-Bottermann, K. E., Haberey, M., 1969: Pinocytose und Bewegung von Amöben. V. Konturveränderungen und Faltungsgrad der Zelloberfläche vonAmoeba proteus. Cytobiologie1, 37–57.
Stossel, T., Hartwig, J., 1976: Interactions of actin, myosin and a new actin-binding protein of rabbit pulmonary macrophages. II. Role in cytoplasmic movement and phagocytosis. J. Cell Biol.68, 602–619.
Taylor, D. L., 1976: Motile model systems of ameboid movement. In: Cell motility (Goldman, R. D., Pollard, T. D., Rosenbaum, J., eds.), pp. 797–821. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
—, 1977: The contractile basis of ameboid movement. IV. The viscoelasticity and contractility of ameba cytoplasmin vivo. Exp. Cell Res.105, 413–426.
—,Condeelis, J. S., 1979: Cytoplasmic structure and contractility in ameboid cells. Internat. Rev. Cytol.56, 57–144.
— —,Moore, P. L., Allen, R. D., 1973: The contractile basis of ameboid movement. I. The chemical control of motility in isolated cytoplasm. J. Cell Biol.59, 378–394.
—,Hellewell, S. B., Virgin, H. W., Heiple, J., 1979: The solation contraction coupling hypothesis of cell movement. In: Cell motility: molecules and organization (Hatano, S., Ishikawa, H., Sato, H., eds.), pp. 363–367. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Wallach, D. P., Davies, J. A., Pastan, I., 1978: Purification of mammalian filamin. Similarity to high molecular weight actin binding protein in macrophages, platelets, fibroblasts and other tissues. J. biol. Chem.253, 3328–3335.
Wehland, J., Weber, K., Gawlitta, W., Stockem, W., 1979: Effects of the actin-binding protein DNAse I on cytoplasmic streaming and ultrastructure ofAmoeba proteus. An attempt to explain amoeboid movement. Cell Tiss. Res.199, 353–372.
Wolpert, L., Gingell, D., 1968: Cell surface membrane and amoeboid movement. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol.22, 169–198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I dedicate this paper to the memory of Reginald J. Goldacre, deceased in December 1983, who twenty years ago introduced me to the study of amoebae.
Study supported by Research Project II. 1 of the Polish Academy of Science.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grębecki, A. Relative motion inAmoeba proteus in respect to the adhesion sites. I. Behavior of monotactic forms and the mechanism of fountain phenomenon. Protoplasma 123, 116–134 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283582
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283582