References
A. A. Andronovet al. (1979): Qualitative Theory of Second-Order Dynamic Systems, New York.
M. Aoki (1976): Optimal Control and System Theory in Dynamic Economic Analysis, New York.
K. J. Arrow (1962): The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies29, pp. 155–173.
A. B. Atkinson (1969): The Time-Scale of Economic Models: How Long is the Long Run? Review of Economic Studies36, pp. 137–152.
E. D. Domar (1957): Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, Oxford.
E. M. Drandakis and E. S. Phelps (1966): A Model of Induced Invention, Growth and Distribution, Economic Journal76, pp. 823–840.
W. R. Evans (1948): Graphical Analysis of Control Systems, Transactions of the A. I. E. E.67, pp. 547–551.
R. Frisch (1933): Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economies, Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, London, pp. 171–206.
R. M. Goodwin (1967): A Growth Cycle,in: C. H. Feinstein (ed.): Socialism, Capitalism and Growth, Cambridge, pp. 54–58.
G. Hall and J. M. Watt (eds.) (1976): Modern Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, Oxford.
R. F. Harrod (1948): Towards a Dynamic Economics, London.
J. R. Hicks (1950): A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle, Oxford.
R. F. Kahn (1959): Exercises in the Analysis of Growth, Oxford Economic Papers2, pp. 143–156.
N. Kaldor (1956): Alternative Theories of Distribution, Review of Economic Studies23, pp. 83–100.
N. Kaldor (1957): A Model of Economic Growth, Economic Journal67, pp. 591–624.
M. Kalecki (1939): Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations, London.
C. Kennedy (1964): Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution, Economic Journal74, pp. 541–547.
D. A. Livesey (1979): The Role of Feedback in Macroeconomic Policy,in: S. Hollyet al. (eds.): Optimal Control for Econometric Models: An Approach to Economic Policy Formulation, London, pp. 58–73.
S. K. Kuipers (1981): Keynesian and Neoclassical Growth Models: A Sequential Analytical Approach, De Economist129, pp. 58–104.
E. Malinvaud (1980): Profitability and Unemployment, Cambridge.
J. E. Meade (1961): A Neo-Classical Theory of Economic Growth, London.
L. Pasinetti (1962): Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Profit, Review of Economic Studies29, pp. 267–279.
F. van der Ploeg (1981): Economic Growth and the Distribution of Income, Paper Presented to the 1982 European Meeting of the Econometric Society, Trinity College, Dublin.
I. Postlethwaite and A. G. J. MacFarlane (1979): A Complex Variable Approach to the Analysis of Linear Multivariable Feedback Systems, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
J. Robinson (1956): The Accumulation of Capital, London.
P. A. Samuelson (1962): Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function, Review of Economic Studies29, pp. 193–206.
P. A. Samuelson (1965): A Theory of Induced Innovations Along Kennedy-Weizsäcker Lines, Review of Economics and Statistics47, pp. 343–356.
R. Sato (1963): Fiscal Policy in a Neo-Classical Growth Model: An Analysis of Time Required for Equilibrating Adjustment, Review of Economic Studies30, pp. 16–23.
A. Shah and M. Desai (1981): Growth Cycles with Induced Technical Change, Economic Journal91, pp. 1006–1010.
R. M. Solow (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly journal of Economics70, pp. 65–94.
J. R. N. Stone (1980): A Simple Growth Process Tending to Stationarity, Economic Journal90, pp. 593–597.
T. W. Swan (1956): Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation, Economic Record32, pp. 334–361.
K. Velupillai (1979): Some Stability Properties of Goodwin's Growth Cycle, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie39, pp. 245–257.
K. Wicksell (1907): Krisernes Gåta, Statsökonomisk Tidsskrift21, pp. 255–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is a member of the Cambridge Growth Project and acknowledges financial support from the SSRC, U. K. The author thanks Sir Richard Stone for many fruitful discussions on the topic of cyclical growth and Geoff Harcourt for discussions on post-Keynesian analysis. The paper has also benefited from the constructive comments of two anonymous referees. The author accepts all responsibility for remaining errors and omissions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Ploeg, F. Predator-prey and neo-classical models of cyclical growth. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 43, 235–256 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283573
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283573