Skip to main content
Log in

Locational factors in automobile ownership decisions

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An economic utility theory model specifying automobile ownership decision-making in terms of intra-urban locational factors is presented. The long-range objective of the research is to provide an improvement in urban transportation planners' understanding of the relationships between automobile ownership by families residing within urban environments and the supply of transportation system facilities and services. Determinant variables in the model are: the spatial locations of trip destinations accessible to urban travellers with and without use of an automobile and at various times of day, the respective travel times to these destinations by auto and by alternate public transit modes, and the yearly capital and operating cost of automobile ownership in excess of cost by the alternate mode(s). Explicitly evaluated factors in the theory of decision-making proposed include the perceived benefits to tripmakers of travelling to destinations at various times, and the values placed on leisure time and consumption of all other goods. Emphasis is placed on decisions to purchase a second car, predictions of which are particularly relevant to urban transportation planning. Empirical tests for application with traditional transportation planning data are developed for various model hypotheses. These hypotheses are interpreted in terms of future research needs and directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldana, Eduardo, Richard de Neufville and Joseph H. Stafford [1973]. Microanalysis of Urban Transportation Demand. Presented at Annual Meeting of Highway Research Board, January.

  • Beckmann, Martin J. and Thomas F. Golob [1972]. A Critique of Entropy and Gravity in Travel Forecasting, in G. F. Newell, ed.Traffic Flow and Transportation. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M. E. and J. F. Kain [1964]. Urban Form, Car Ownership and Public Policy: An Appraisal of “Traffic in Towns.”Urban Studies, 1: 174–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates [1972]. A Disaggregated Behavioral Model of Urban Travel Demand. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration of the U. S. Department of Transportation, March.

  • Cherniack, Nathan [1960]. Critique of Home-Interview Type O-D Surveys in Urban Areas.Highway Research Board Bulletin 253.

  • Deutschman, Harold [1967]. Auto Ownership Revisited: A Review of Methods Used in Estimating and Distributing Auto Ownership.Highway Research Record No. 205: 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, Robert T. [1972]. Transit Accessibility as a Determinant of Auto Ownership. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, January. To be published inHighway Research Record.

  • Ferrara, S. V. [1965]. CATS Car Ownership Forecast: A New Approach.Chicago Area Transportation Study Research News, June.

  • Gehlke, C. E. and Katherine Biehl [1934]. Certain Effects of Grouping Upon the Size of the Correlation Coefficient in Census Tract Material.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 24: 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, Thomas F.. and Martin J. Beckmann [1970]. A Utility Model for Travel Forecasting.Transportation Science, 4, 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T. F., R. L. Gustafson and M. J. Beckmann [1972]. An Economic Utility Theory Approach to Spatial Interaction. Presented at the 1972 North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association, November. To be published inPapers of the Regional Science Association.

  • Kain, J. F. and M. E. Beesley [1965]. Forecasting Car Ownership and Use.Urban Studies, 2: 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Gerald [1969]. Multiple-Regression Analysis of Household Trip Generation: A Critique.Highway Research Record No. 297: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, William [1964]. The Use of Social Statistics in Estimating Auto Ownership.Highway Research News No. 16.

  • Oi, Walter and Paul Shuldiner [1962].An Analysis of Urban Travel Demand. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn-Jersey Transportation Study [1965]. Volume 3: 1975 Transportation Plans, May.

  • Pittsburgh Area Transportation Study [1960]. Technical Paper No. 3: Vehicle Registration Forecast, June.

  • Puget Sound Regional Transportation Study [1964]. Staff Report No. 9: 1985 Forecasts of Trucks and Passenger Vehicles Owned at Households, April.

  • Robinson, W. S. [1950]. Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals.American Sociological Review, 15: 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, Robert and Michael G. Ferreri [1967]. Auto Ownership as Affected by Transportation System Alternatives. Traffic Engineering, 38: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. G. [1967]. A Statistical Theory of Spatial Distribution Models.Transportation Research: 1, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, M.J., Gustafson, R.L. & Golob, T.F. Locational factors in automobile ownership decisions. Ann Reg Sci 7, 1–12 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283480

Keywords

Navigation