Protoplasma

, Volume 213, Issue 3–4, pp 176–183 | Cite as

Paramecium calkinsi andP. putrinum (Ciliophora, Protista) harboring alpha-subgroup bacteria in the cytoplasm

  • S. I. Fokin
  • E. V. Sabaneyeva
  • O. N. Borkhsenious
  • M. Schweikert
  • H. -D. Görtz
Original Papers

Summary

New intracellular bacteria were detected in the cytoplasm ofParamecium calkinsi andP. putrinum. Some of the bacteria were not evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of the host but were found in the center of the cell, eventually near the nuclei, but not in the cortex area, whereas another species was found in the cortex area. These peculiarities of intracellular bacteria localization in the host suggest that the conditions in various parts of the cytoplasm favor bacterial maintenance to different extent. Due to the results obtained by transmission electron microscopy and in situ hybridization using appropriate oligonucleotide probes, the bacteria, three or possibly four species, are Gram-negative and belong to the alpha-subgroup of proteobacteria. Bacteria from one stock ofP. calkinsi were found to be infectious for bacteria-free cells ofP. calkinsi andP. nephridiatum.

Keywords

Cytoplasm Infection Fluorescence in situ hybridization Intracellular bacteria Paramecium calkinsi Paramecium putrinum 

References

  1. Amann RI, Binder BJ, Oslon RJ, Chrisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA (1990) Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial population. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1219–1925Google Scholar
  2. —, Springer N, Ludwig W, Görtz H-D, Scheifer K-H (1991) Identification in situ and phylogeny of uncultured bacteria endosymbionts. Nature 351: 161–164Google Scholar
  3. Brigge T, Fokin SI, Brümmer F, Görtz H-D (1999) Molecular probes for localization of endosymbiotic bacteria in ciliates and toxic dinoflagellates. J Euk Microbiol 46: 11AGoogle Scholar
  4. Clegg S, Gerlach GT (1987) Enterobacterial fimbriae. J Bacteriol 169: 934–938Google Scholar
  5. Duguid JP (1968) The function of fimbriae. Arch Immunol Therap Exp 16: 173–188Google Scholar
  6. Fokin SI (1989a) Bacterial endobionts of the ciliateParamecium woodruffi I: endobionts of the macronucleus. Cytologia (Sankt Petersburg) 31: 829–844Google Scholar
  7. — (1989b) Bacterial endobionts of the ciliateParamecium woodruffi III: endobionts of the cytoplasm. Cytologia (Sankt Petersburg) 31: 964–970Google Scholar
  8. —, Karpov SA (1995) Bacterial endocytobionts inhabiting the perinuclear space of protista. Endocyt Cell Res 11: 81–94Google Scholar
  9. —, Sabaneyeva EV (1993) Bacterial endocytobionts of the ciliateParamecium calkinsi. Eur J Protistol 29: 390–395Google Scholar
  10. —, Brigge T, Brenner J, Görtz H-D (1996)Holospora species infecting the nuclei ofParamecium appear to belong into two groups of bacteria. Eur J Protistol 32 Suppl 1: 19–24Google Scholar
  11. Görtz H-D, Dieckmann J (1987)Leptomonas ciliatorum n. sp. in the macronucleus of hypotrich ciliate J Protozool 34: 259–265Google Scholar
  12. Gromov BV (1985) Structure of bacteria. LGU, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckmann K, Görtz H-D (1991) Prokaryotic symbionts of ciliates. In: Balows A, Truper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Scheifer K-H (eds) The prokaryotes, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 3865–3890Google Scholar
  14. Moreno E (1998) Genome evolution within the alpha Proteobacteria: why do some bacteria not possess plasmids and others exhibit more than one different chromosome? FEMS Microbiol Rev 22: 255–275Google Scholar
  15. Preer JR, Preer LB (1984) Endosymbionts of protozoa. In: Krieg NR (ed) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 1. Willams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 795–811Google Scholar
  16. —, Preer LB, Jurand A (1974) Kappa and other endosymbionts inParamecium aurelia. Bacteriol Rev 38: 113–163Google Scholar
  17. Preer LB (1969) Alpha, an infectious macronuclear symbiont ofParamecium aurelia. J Protozool 16: 570–578Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. I. Fokin
    • 1
  • E. V. Sabaneyeva
    • 1
  • O. N. Borkhsenious
    • 2
  • M. Schweikert
    • 3
  • H. -D. Görtz
    • 3
  1. 1.Biological InstituteSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of Biological ScienceLouisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge
  3. 3.Biological InstituteUniversity of StuttgartStuttgart

Personalised recommendations