Summary
Special features of teliospores in smut fungi are described, including teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores. Balls of teliospores in species of many different genera cohere by remnants of hyphal walls, sheaths, and sometimes interlocking ornamentation. Teliospores are connected in pairs in species ofMycosyrinx andGeminago by special local structures. Appendages can be formed locally by persistent material from the sheath (Cintractia, Anthracoidea, Sphacelotheca), thickened parts of the spore wall (e.g.,Georgefischeria, Jamesdicksonia, Rhamphospora, Tolyposporella), or persistent walls of sporogenous hyphae (Rhamphospora, genera of the Tilletia relationship). Species ofGeorgefischeria, Jamesdicksonia, andTolyposporella have teliospore walls composed of more than three layers of different electron density. “Germ areas” corresponding to thinner parts of the spore wall are known, e.g., for species ofAnthracoidea, Cintractia, andUstilago infecting members of the family Poaceae, while distinct germ pores, one per teliospore, are found in some species ofThecaphora, “Tolyposporium”, andSporisorium. Teliospores ofMycosyrinx cissi have a germination ring. Characteristics of teliospores are used to discuss the phylogeny of smut fungi. A phylogenetic tree in accordance with teliospore characteristics is compared to those obtained from ultrastructural characteristics of host-parasite interaction, of septal pores, and from sequence data. Aspects of teliospore development help to define taxa at a high systematic level (Entorrhizales, Ustilaginales, Tilletiales/Entylomatales, Microbotryaceae), while details of ornamentation ontogeny delimit groups of genera (e.g., genera related toUstilago on members of the Poaceae andSporisorium, Cintractia andAnthracoidea, Tilletia) or single genera (e.g.,Melanopsichium, Dermatosorus, Mycosyrinx, Doassinga, Rhamphospora). Types of ornamentation (warty, reticulate), middle layers, teliospore balls, and germ pores evolved repeatedly by convergence. The smut teliospore itself probably evolved independently at least twice, or perhaps three (or more) times, in the Microbotryales, in the Entorrhizales, and in a common ancestor of the remainder of the Ustilaginomycetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer R, Oberwinkler F, Vánky K (1997) Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Can J Bot 75: 1273–1314
—, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Piepenbring M, Berbee ML (1999) Ustilaginomycetes. In: McLaughlin D, McLaughlin E, Lemke PA (eds) Mycota, vol 7, systematics and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in press)
Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (1997) Phylogenetic studies on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. Can J Bot 75: 2045–2056
Deml G, Oberwinkler F, Bauer R (1985) Studies in Heterobasi-diomycetes, part 38:Sphacelotheca polygoni-persicariae G. Deml & Oberw. spec. nov. Phytopathol Z 113: 231–242
Denchev CM (1997) New combinations inBauhinus (Microbotryaceae). Mycotaxon 65: 419–426
Hess WM, Weber DJ (1976) Form and function in basidiomycete spores. In: Weber DJ, Hess WM (eds) The fungal spore: form and function. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 643–713
Khanna A, Payak MM, Prakash N (1971) Teliospore morphology of some smut fungi III:Ustilago nuda. Indian Phytopathol 24: 481–486
Kukkonen I (1963) Taxonomic studies on the genusAnthracoidea (Ustilaginales). Ann Bot Soc Zool Bot Fenn Vanamo 34: 1–122
— (1969) The spore surface in theAnthracoidea section Echinosporae (Ustilaginales): a study with light and electron microscopy. Ann Bot Fenn 6: 269–283
—, Gjaerum H (1977)Cintractia species parasitic onScleria (Cyperaceae). Norw J Bot 24: 89–97
Langdon RFN, Fullerton RA (1978) The genusSphacelotheca (Ustilaginales): criteria for its delimitation and the consequences thereof. Mycotaxon 51: 421–456
Luttrell ES (1987) Relations of hyphae to host cells in smut galls caused by species ofTilletia, Tolyposporium, andUstilago. Can J Bot 65: 2581–2591
Moore RT (1992) The genusBauhinus gen. nov.: for species ofUstilago on dicot hosts. Mycotaxon 45: 97–100
— (1996) An inventory of the phylum Ustomycota. Mycotaxon 59: 1–31
Nagler A (1986) Untersuchungen zur Gattungsabgrenzung vonGinanniella Ciferri undUrocystis Rabenhorst sowie zur Ontogenie vonThecaphora seminis-convolvuli (Desm.) Ito. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany
Paine WA, Hess WM (1984) Ultrastructure of germinating sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) teliospores. Trans Br Mycol Soc 82: 385–395
Piepenbring M (1994) Brandpilze (Ustilaginales und Tilletiales) von Costa Rica: Ökologie, Morphologie, Ultrastruktur und Systematik. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany
— (1995)Trichocintractia, a new genus forCintractia utriculicola (Ustilaginales). Can J Bot 73: 1089–1096
—, Bauer R (1995) Noteworthy germinations of some Costa Rican Ustilaginales. Mycol Res 99: 853–858
— —, Oberwinkler F (1998a) Teliospores of smut fungi: general aspects of teliospore walls and sporogenesis. Protoplasma 204: 155–169
— — — (1998b) Teliospores of smut fungi: teliospore walls and the development of ornamentation studied by electron microscopy. Protoplasma: 204: 170–201
Ramberg JE, McLaughlin DJ (1980) Ultrastructural study of promycelial development and basidiospore initiation inUstilago maydis. Can J Bot 58: 1548–1561
Roberson RW, Luttrell ES (1987) Ultrastructure of teliospore ontogeny inTilletia indica. Mycologia 79: 753–763
Savile DBO (1954) Cellular mechanics, taxonomy and evolution in the Uredinales and Ustilaginales. Mycologia 46: 736–761
Vánky K (1986) The genusMoesziomyces (Ustilaginales). Nord J Bot 6: 67–73
— (1987) Illustrated genera of smut fungi. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart
— (1994) European smut fungi. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart
— (1996)Mycosyrinx and other pair-spored Ustilaginales. Mycoscience 37: 173–185
— (1997) New Ustilaginales from Australia. Mycotaxon 62: 151–174
— (1998a) Proposal to conserve the generic nameThecaphora againstSorosporium (Fungi, Ustilaginales). Taxon 47: 153–154
— (1998b) A survey of the spore-ball-forming smut fungi. Mycol Res 102: 513–526
Vánky K (1998c) The genusMicrobotryum (smut fungi). Mycotaxon 67: 33–60
—, Bauer R (1995)Oberwinkleria, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 53: 361–368
— — (1996)Ingoldiomyces, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 59: 277–287
—, Oberwinkler F (1994) Ustilaginales on Polygonaceae: a taxonomic revision. Nova Hedwigia Beih 107: 1–96
—, Websdane K (1996) New Ustilaginales on Cyperaceae from Australia. Mycotaxon 58: 167–183
—, Bauer R, Begerow D (1997)Fulvisporium, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 64: 57–66
Woronin M (1881) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Ustilagineen. Abh Senckenb Naturforsch Ges 12: 559–591 + 4 Pls
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Part 166 in the series “Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes” from the Botanical Institute, University of Tübingen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piepenbring, M., Bauer, R. & Oberwinkler, F. Teliospores of smut fungi teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores studied by electron microscopy; phylogenetic discussion of characteristics of teliospores. Protoplasma 204, 202–218 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280324
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280324