Abstract
Structural optimization has progressed significantly in the past twenty years and is now commonly used in the design of mechanical and aeronautical components. A multitude of optimization programs exist and many have been incorporated in finite element programs and are an integral part of that design tool. Problems consisting of a single discipline such as structural, vibrational, etc., have been dealt with successfully by researchers. Multidisciplinary problems such as the design of an aircraft which involves structural, aerodynamic, control and other disciplines were solved using sequentially generated optimized solutions. These sequentially generated optimized solutions need not necessarily lead to a global optimum solution for a coupled problem, as the interdisciplinary effects play a major role in reaching a globally optimized design.
This work is aimed at formulating an efficient procedure for coupling multiple disciplines, sensing the effect of one discipline over the other using approximations and move limit strategies. It involves using the information generated from the Two Point Exponential Approximation (TPEA) (which is a first-order approximation modified to include a parameter equivalent to the curvature of functions with respect to the design variables) in the coordination procedure for optimization of multidisciplinary problems.
An algorithm, the Best Design Selection Strategy (BDSS), for coupling the multiple disciplines is proposed. The main feature of this algorithm is that the coupling is done such that parallel analysis without any interdependency of one process over the other is still possible. BDSS uses the rule of “survival of the fittest”.
The BDSS algorithm is tested on three problems: a beam, a three-bar truss with lumped mass and a ten-bar truss with lumped mass, considering stress and displacement constraints as one discipline (static) and frequency constraints as a second discipline (dynamic).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fadel, G.M.; Hyams, G.D. 1994: Comparison of various move limit strategies in structural optimization.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AMS 35th SDM Conf. (held at Hilton Head, SC). Paper 94-1359, pp. 401–410
Fadel, G.M.; Riley, M.F.; Barthelemy, J.M. 1990: Two point approximation method for structural optimization.Struct. Optim. 2, 117–124
Fadel, G.M.; Cimtalay, S.: 1993 Automatic evolution of movelimits in structural optimization.Struct. Optim. 6, 233–237
Pritchard, J.I.; Adelman, H.M. 1990: Differential equation based method for accurate approximations in optimization.NASA TM-102639, AVSCOM TM 90-B-006
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1988: Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems.NASA TM-101494
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary optimization for aircraft design. Recent Advances and Results.AIAA J. of Aircraft 27/12, 993–1001
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Barthelemy, J.; Giles, G.L. 1984: Aerospace engineering design by systematic decomposition and multilevel optimization.Proc. 14th Congr. Int. Council of Aeronautical Science, Paper 84-4.7.3, pp. 828–840. Washington D.C.: AIAA
Swanson Analysis Systems Inc. 1994:ANSYS engineering analysis system. User's manual. Vols I; II; III and IV
Vanderplaats, G.N. 1973: CONMIN, a FORTRAN program for constrained function minimization. User's manual.NASA TM-X-62.282
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. Sobieski
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tatineni, S., Fadel, G.M. Coupling through move limits in multidisciplinary optimization. Structural Optimization 11, 50–55 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279655
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279655