Skip to main content
Log in

A co-culture system leads to the formation of microcalli derived from microspore protoplasts ofBrassica napus L. cv. Topas

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper describes a procedure in which protoplasts are obtained from microspores and pollen of rapeseed to induce callus formation aided by a feeder cell system with embryogenic microspores. Microspores at late unicellular stage and pollen at early bicellular stage were isolated and precultured for 24 h at 32 °C before enzymatic treatment. Eleven enzymes were tested in various combinations and concentrations. The optimal enzyme combination was 1.0% cellulase, 0.8% pectinase, 0.3% macerozyme, and 0.02% pectolyase, in which 26.3% of the microspores released protoplasts. A successful co-culture system was set up by employing embryogenic microspores as feeder cells. To this end, microspores were cultured in a medium with high osmotic pressure at 32 °C. Up to 37% of the microspores exhibited cell division and embryos developed to the heart-shape stage without changing medium. Microspore protoplasts were cultured in Millicells surrounded by the embryogenic microspores as feeder. In growth-regulator-free medium 14.5% of the protoplasts divided but only formed budding-like multicellular structures. Only after pretreatment with 4 mg of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 1 mg of naphthaleneacetic acid per liter protoplasts divided and formed microcalli. Pollen tubes or tubelike structures were not observed. The experiments reveal that selection of the specific developmental stage of microspores, which is a prerequisite for microspore embryogenesis, is also important in microspore protoplast culture. Compared to other methods used before, microculture fed with embryogenic microspores has obvious superiority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CPW:

basic protoplast washing medium according to Power and Chapman

CPW972 CPW:

basic medium supplemented with 9% mannitol and 7.2% sorbitol

DAPI:

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

NLN:

nutrient medium according to Lichter modified by Pechan and Keller

NLN13 NLN:

medium supplemented with 13% sucrose

NLNP NLN13:

supplemented with 7.2% sorbitol

References

  • Bajaj YPS (1974) Isolation and culture studies on pollen tetrad and pollen mother cell protoplasts. Plant Sci Lett 3: 93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1983) Haploid protoplasts. Int Rev Cytol Suppl 16: 113–141

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Cocking EC (1973) The isolation, culture and fusing of pollen protoplasts. In Vitro 8: 420

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Davey MR (1974) The isolation and ultrastructure of pollen protoplasts. In: Linskens HF (ed) Fertilization in higher plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi BG, Franceschi VR, Loewus FA (1987) Preparation and properties of pollen sporoplasts. Protoplasma 141: 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojwani SS, Cocking EC (1972) Isolation of protoplast from pollen tetrads. Nat New Biol 239: 29–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu CM, Sun MX, Zhou C, Yang HY (1996) Isolation of fertilized embryo sac and triggering of zygote division in vitro inNicotiana tabacum. Acta Bot Sin 38: 262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Hause B, Hause G (1996) Induction of embryogenesis in microspores and pollen ofBrassica napus L. cv. Topas. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • —, van Veenendaal WLH, Hause G, van Lammeren AAM (1994) Expression of polarity during early development of microspore-derived and zygotic embryos ofBrassica napus L. cv. Topas. Bot Acta 107: 407–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technol 45: 115–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holm PB, Knudsen S, Mouritzen P, Nigri D, Olsen FL, Roue C (1994) Regeneration of fertile barley plants from mechanically isolated protoplasts of the fertilized egg cell. Plant Cell 6: 531–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Huang B (1987) Application of pollen-derived plants to crop improvement. Int Rev Cytol 107: 397–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamura J, Potrykus I (1983) Isolation tetrad protoplasts develop to the binucleate stage in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Havana). In: Potrykus I, Harms CT, Hinnen A, Hütter R, King PJ, Shillito RD (eds) Protoplasts 1983: Poster proceedings 6th International Protoplast Symposium. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth ofVicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126: 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox RB, Williams EG, Dumas C (1986) Pollen, pistil, and reproductive function in crop plants. Plant Breed Rev 4: 9–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz E, Lörz H (1993) In vitro fertilization with isolated single gametes results in zygotic embryogenesis and fertile maize plants. Plant Cell 5: 739–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Xiu B, Zheng C, Zhou C (1993) Pollen cryopreservation and protoplast isolation inBrassica napus. J Wuhan Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 6: 133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter R (1982) Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen ofBrassica napus. Z Pflanzenphysiol 105: 211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney MM, Holbrook LA (1993) Transformation and foreign gene expression. In: Labana KS, Banga SS, Banga SS (eds) Breeding oilseed brassicas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 148–167 (Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics, vol 19)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa H, Nishihara M (1997) Use of pollen in gene transfer. In: Shivanna KR, Sawhney VK (eds) Pollen biotechnology for crop production and improvement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 423–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CE, Keller WA (1997) Pollen embryos. In: Shivanna KR, Sawhney VK (eds) Pollen biotechnology for crop production and improvement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 392–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechan P, Keller WA (1988) Identification of potentially embryogenic microspores inBrassica napus. Physiol Plant 74: 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Power JB, Chapman JV (1985) Isolation, culture and genetic manipulation of plant protoplasts. In: Dixon RA (ed) Plant cell culture: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 37–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekhar EW (1973) Nuclear divisions in protoplasts isolated from pollen tetrads ofDatura metel. Nature 246: 223–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth D (1974) Solubility of pollen exine. Am J Bot 61: 36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Yang HY, Zhou C (1995) Single pair fusion of various combinations between female gametoplasts and other protoplasts inNicotiana tabacum. Acta Bot Sin 37: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kieft H, van Lammeren AAM (1998) Cotyledon derived haploid and diploid protoplast culture and diploid plant regeneration inBrassica napus L cv. Topas. Can J Bot 76: 530–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka L, Kitazuma C, Ito M (1987) The isolation and culture of lily pollen protoplasts. Plant Sci 50: 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhou C (1992) An ultrastructural study on triggering of cell division in young pollen protoplast culture ofHemerocallis fulva L. Acta Bot Sin 34: 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia HJ, Zhou C, Yang HY (1996) Isolation and early in vitro development of young pollen protoplasts inNicotiana tabacum. Acta Bot Sin 38: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C (1988) A study on isolation and culture of pollen protoplasts. Plant Sci 59: 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1989) Cell division in pollen protoplast culture ofHemerocallis fulva L. Plant Sci 62: 229–235

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Wu Y (1990) Two pathways in pollen protoplast culture: cell division and tube growth. In: Nijkamp HJJ, Plas LHW van der, Aartrijk I (eds) Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology: proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 222–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, M., Kieft, H., Zhou, C. et al. A co-culture system leads to the formation of microcalli derived from microspore protoplasts ofBrassica napus L. cv. Topas. Protoplasma 208, 265–274 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279098

Keywords

Navigation