Skip to main content
Log in

The presence of heterospecific pollen on stigmas of nectariferous and nectarless orchids and its consequences for their reproductive success

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The widespread occurrence of nonorchid, heterospecific pollen grains on the stigmatic surfaces of a range of nectariferous and nectarless European orchids (Dactylorhiza. Orchis, Goodyera, andGymnadenia species) is reported for the first time, and the impact of heterospecific pollination on orchid reproductive success is experimentally investigated. There are three main components of stigmatic contamination by heterospecific pollen: the frequency of contamination, the diversity of foreign species present on the stigma, and the amount of pollen deposited. Six out of seven of the species examined have greater than 85% of stigmas contaminated with wind and insect-dispersed pollen. From one to nine insect-dispersed foreign pollen species are present per stigma, including pollen of members of the families Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Caryohpyllaceae, Ericaceae, and Primulaceae. Average loads per stigma vary from 13 to 176 grains, with individual stigma loads ranging from one to 909. Whether or not the orchid provides nectar has a major impact on these three components. Nectarless orchids have the greatest frequencies of contamination, diversity of species, and average load per stigma. Insect-dispersed pollen is deposited both by pollinators and visitors but, in spite of low levels of pollination, nectarless orchids still exhibit higher frequencies of heterospecific pollen contamination. The effect of the presence of heterospecific pollen on the reproductive success of orchids is tested in this study for the first time. Average-to-high, naturally occurring loads of heterospecific pollen derived from a mixture ofArmeria maritima,Caltha palustris,Cochlearia officinalis,Cytisus scoparius, andPrimula vulgaris and consisting of 50–250 grains per load are placed onto stigmas ofDactylorhiza purpurella which are subsequently self-pollinated with half of a pollinium. All pollinations produce capsules indicating that heterospecific pollen does not affect fruit set. Although experimental and control fruits are similar in size, they differ in total seed weight and composition. Total seed weight is reduced and the proportion of seeds with normal embryos decreased while the proportion of unfertilised ovules increased following pollination with heterospecific pollen, indicating a detrimental effect on fertilisation. Lower reproductive success caused by fertilisation failure is likely to be most severe in nectarless species because of their generally higher levels of contaminated stigmas. As nectarless orchids are known to have lower fruit set compared with nectariferous ones, this finding suggests that the reproductive success of nectarless orchids may be even lower than previously realised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RS:

reproductive success

References

  • Ackerman JD, Rodriguez-Robles JA, Melendez EJ (1994) A meager nectar offering by an epiphytic orchid is better than nothing. Biotropica 26: 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster WS, McGuire AD (1991) Experimental assessment of reproductive interactions between sympatricAster andErigeron (Asteraceae) in interior Alaska. Am J Bot 78: 1449–1457

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti J (1992) Fundamentals of orchid biology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ (1969) Studies in the pollination ecology ofViola I: the pollen content of stigmatic cavities. Watsonia 7: 142–156

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1971) Pollination mechanisms inViola. New Phytol 70: 343–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1979) Convergence, competition and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 60: 1022–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Motten KW (1985) The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 66: 554–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper SC, Calder DM (1990) The floral biology ofThelymitra epipactoides (Orchidaceae), and the implications of pollination by deceit on the survival of this rare orchid. Plant Syst Evol 170: 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1983) Pollination ofOrchis caspia: a nectarless plant which deceives the pollinators of nectariferous species from other plant families. J Ecol 71: 467–474

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Calder DM (1987) Pollination by deceit and floral mimicry inThelymitra antennifera. Plant Syst Evol 158: 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RW (1986) The pollination biology ofCypripedium acaule (Orchidaceae). Rhodora 88: 445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler RL (1993) Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Murray KG, Kinsman S, Busby WH (1986) Floral neighbourhood and pollination success in four hummingbirdpollinated cloud forest plant species. Ecology 67: 449–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill DE (1989) Fruiting failure, pollinator inefficiency, and speciation in orchids. In: Otte D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 458–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeman-Kwak M (1973) The pollination ofPedicularis palustris by nectar thieves (short-tongued bumblebees). Acta Bot Neerl 22: 608–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn JR, Waser NM (1985) The effect ofDelphinium nelsonii pollen on seed set inIpomopsis aggregata, a competitor for hummingbird pollination. Am J Bot 72: 1144–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak MM, Jennersten O (1991) Bumblebee visitation and seed set inMelampyrum pratense andViscaria vulgaris: heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia 86: 99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson RJ, Larson KS (1990) Observations of the pollination biology ofSpiranthes romanzoffiana. Lindleyana 2: 176–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1972) Pollen exchange as a function of species proximity inPhlox. Evolution 26: 251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kerster HW (1967) An analysis of interspecific pollen exchange in Phlox. Am Nat 101: 387–399

    Google Scholar 

  • McLernon SM, Murphy SD, Aarssen LW (1996) Heterospecific pollen transfer between sympatric species in a mid-successional old-field community. Am J Bot 83: 1168–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Motten AF (1986) Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol Monogr 56: 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiland MRM (1994) Reproductive ecology of British and Mediterranean orchids. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • - Wilcock CC (1993) The reproductive ecology ofDactylorhiza lapponica in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Report, Edinburgh

  • — — (1994) Reproductive ecology of European Orchidaceae. In: Pridgeon A (ed) Proceedings of the 14th World Orchid Conference. HMSO, London, pp 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1995) Maximisation of reproductive success by European Orchidaceae under conditions of infrequent pollination. Protoplasma 187: 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1998) Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. Am J Bot 85: 1657–1671

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (2000) Effects of pollinator behaviour on pollination of nectarless orchids: floral mimicry and interspecific hybridisation. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Systematics and evolution of monocots: proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocots, Sydney, September 1998, vol 1. CSIRO, Melbourne (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson LA (1983) Processes of isolation and introgressive interplay betweenPlatanthera bifolia (L.) Rich andP. chlorantha (Custer) Reichb. (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 87: 325–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Harper Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall JL, Hilu KW (1990) Interference through improper pollen transfer in mixed stands ofImpatiens capensis andI. pallida (Balsaminaceae). Am J Bot 77: 939–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhada K, Jayachandra (1980) Pollen allelopathy: a new phenomenon. New Phytol 84: 739–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Andrews BJ, Plowright RC (1981) The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development inDiervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). New Phytol 90: 777–783

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neiland, M.R.M., Wilcock, C.C. The presence of heterospecific pollen on stigmas of nectariferous and nectarless orchids and its consequences for their reproductive success. Protoplasma 208, 65–75 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279076

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279076

Keywords

Navigation