Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrastructure of the mesophyll in scots pine and Norway spruce: Seasonal variation and molarity of the fixative buffer

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Resolution of the ultrastructure of the needles of both Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] is strongly influenced by the molarity of the buffer used in fixation. When 0.2 M or 0.1 M buffer is used in fixation during the summer, the constituents of the cytoplasm are precipitated, resulting in poor resolution of the membranes and lamellae and often in negative staining. The tannin in the central vacuole appears as a thick ribbon. By using correct molarities of buffer during each season (0.1 M for autumn and winter and ca. 0.05 M for the growing season), the best possible resolution will be achieved. With good resolution the tannin in the central vacuole appears in granular form throughout the year, and the cytoplasm and its organelles are clearly distinguishable during every season. During the growing season, the chloroplasts in the needles of Scots pine are spread to the cell walls and have large starch grains; the stroma and grana lamellae are well developed; the stroma and cytoplasm are rich in polysomes. Mitochondria and microbodies can be clearly resolved. During hardening and afterwords throughout the winter, the chloroplasts, which at this time contain no starch, and other cytoplasmic organelles aggregate in the corners of the cells. The chloroplast envelopes and the stroma and grana lamellae stay intact. The cytoplasm is netlike and rich in ribosomes, mitochondria and microbodies, all of which are intact and clearly distinguishable. During spring activation the structure returns to that described for the growing season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronsson, A., Ingestad, T., Lööf, L.-G., 1976: Carbohydrate metabolism and frost hardiness in pine and spruce seedlings grown at different photoperiods and thermoperiods. Physiol. Plant.36, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., 1972: Electron microscopy of the development of needles ofPinus nigra var.maritima. Ann. Bot. (London)36, 711–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, J. F., Chabot, B. F., 1975: Developmental and seasonal patterns of mesophyll ultrastructure inAbies balsamea. Can. J. Bot.53, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish Meteorological Institute 1978. Meteorological Yearbook of Finland 1978.

  • Harris, W. M., 1971: Ultrastructural observations on the mesophyll cells of pine leaves. Can. J. Bot.49, 1107–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen, S.,Kärenlampi, L.,Kolari, K., in press: Changes in osmotic potential and some related physiological variables in needles of polluted Norway spruce (Picea abies).

  • Lewis, F. J., Tuttle, G. M., 1920: Osmotic properties of some plant cells at low temperatures. Ann. Bot.34, 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S., 1972: Seasonal variation of pigments in needles. A study of Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings grown under different nursery conditions. Stud. For. Suec.100, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B., Öquist, G., 1979: Seasonal and experimentally induced changes in the ultrastructure ofPinus silvestris. Physiol. Plant.46, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollykainen, A. M., 1969: Dynamics of the plastid pigments in leaves of some trees in Karelia. Lesovedenie2, 72–76. (Cf. Chem. Abstr., 71, 46694 y.)

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: Plastid pigments in spruce needles. Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Les. Zh.13 (2), 151–152. (Cf. Chem. Abstr., 73, 127724.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., Philpott, D. E., 1961: An electron microscopic study of chloroplast condition in summer and winter inPinus strobus. Protoplasma53, 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, T. O., Baldwin, G., 1966: Winter breakdown of the photosynthetic apparatus of evergreen species. For. Sci.12, 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senser, M., Schötz, F., Beck, E., 1975: Seasonal changes in structure and function of spruce chloroplasts. Planta (Berl.)126, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soikkeli, S., 1978: Seasonal changes in mesophyll ultrastructure of needles of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can. J. Bot.56, 1932–1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Tuovinen, T., 1979: Damage in mesophyll ultrastructure of needles of Norway spruce in two industrial environments in central Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici16, 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walles, B., Nyman, B., Aldén, T., 1973: On the ultrastructure of needles ofPinus silvestris L. Stud. For. Suec.106, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharowa, T. M., 1929: Über den Gasstoffwechsel der Nadelholzpflanzen im Winter. Planta8, 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soikkeli, S. Ultrastructure of the mesophyll in scots pine and Norway spruce: Seasonal variation and molarity of the fixative buffer. Protoplasma 103, 241–252 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276270

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276270

Keywords

Navigation