Summary
A unique spindle apparatus develops during mitosis in the micronucleus ofParamecium bursaria. During interphase the micronucleus contains short microtubule profiles and clumps of condensed chromatin. Throughout mitosis the nuclear envelope remains intact. During prophase, cup-shaped structures termed microlamellae develop in close association with regions of condensed chromatin. Each micromella consists of an outer sublamella, an inner sublamellae, and ring-shaped structures termed microsepta that join the two sublamellae. Microtubules elongate parallel to the division axis. During metaphase, the microlamellae appear to act as kinetochorelike structures that aid in the alignment of the chromosomes. The microlamellae appear conical and join to a meshwork of microfilaments at their apices. Further toward the polar regions the microfilaments join with microtubules that converge and terminate near the nuclear envelope. During metaphase-anaphase and anaphase the chromosomes are apparently moved by the microfilaments pulling on the kinetochorelike microlamellae. Also during metaphase-anaphase, extranuclear microtubules join the nuclear envelope of the micronucleus to microtubule elements of the cell cortex. By anaphasetelophase, microlamellae and the microfilament meshwork degenerate and microtubules represent the only spindle elements. The evidence of this report supports the hypothesis that microfilaments can participate with microtubules in the movement of chromosomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajer, A. S., andJ. Mole-Bajer, 1972: Spindle dynamics and chromosome movements. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl.3, 1–271.
Behnke, O., A. Forer, andJ. Emmersen, 1971: Actin in sperm tails and metotic spindles. Nature234, 408–410.
Buckley, I. K., 1974: Subcellular motility: A correlated light and electron microscopic study using cultured cells. Tissue and Cell6, 1–20.
Chen, T. T., 1940: Polyploidy and its origin inParamecium. J. Hered.31, 175–184.
Ehret, C. F., andE. L. Powers, 1955: Macronuclear and nucleolar development inParamecium bursaria. Exp. Cell Res.9, 241–275.
Forer, A., andO. Behnke, 1972: An actin-like component in spermatocytes of a crane fly (Nephrotoma suturalis Loew). I. The spindle. Chromosoma39, 145–173.
Fuge, H., 1974: Ultrastructure and function of the spindle apparatus microtubules and chromosomes during nuclear division. Protoplasma82, 289–320.
Gawadi, N., 1971: Actin in the mitotic spindle. Nature234, 410.
—, 1974: Characterization and distribution of microfilaments in dividing locust testis cells. Cytobios10, 17–35.
Hauser, M., andG. Beinbrech, 1973: Deuteriumoxid-induzierte Filamentaggregation im Mikronucleus eines Ciliaten. Z. Naturf.28, 339–341.
Hinkley, R., andA. Telser, 1974: Heavy meromyosin-binding filaments in the mitotic apparatus of mammalian cells. Exp. Cell Res.86, 161–164.
Inaba, F., andN. Kudo, 1972: Electron microscopy of the nuclear events during binary fission inParamecium multimicronucleatum. J. Protozool.19, 57–63.
Ishikawa, H., R. Bischoff, andH. Holtzer, 1969: Formation of arrowhead complexes with heavy meromyosin in a variety of cell types. J. Cell Biol.43, 312–328.
Jokusch, B. M., U. Ryser, andO. Behnke, 1973: Myosin-like protein inPhysarum nuclei. Exp. Cell Res.76, 464–466.
Jurand, A., andG. G. Selman, 1969: The anatomy ofParamecium aurelia. New York: St. Martin's Press.
—, 1970: Ultrastructure of the nuclei and intranuclear microtubules ofParamecium aurelia. J. gen. Microbiol.60, 357–364.
Karakashian, S. J., 1963: Growth ofParamecium bursaria as influenced by the presence of algal symbionts. Physiol. Zool.36, 52–68.
Leclercq-Meyer, V., J. Marchand, andW. J. Malaisse, 1974: Possible role of a microtubular-microfilamentous system in glucagon secretion. Diabetologia10, 215–224.
Lewis, L. M., 1974: The ultrastructure of the nuclear events of binary fission inParamecium bursaria and the effects of colchicine on cell division. In: 32nd Ann. Proc. Electron Microscopy Soc. Amer. (C. J. Arceneaux, ed.), pp. 276–277. Baton Rouge: Claitor's Publishing Division.
—, 1975: The evolutionary significance of ultrastructural variations in the micronuclear spindle apparatus in the genusParamecium. Biosystems7, 380–385.
Luykx, P., 1970: Cellular mechanisms of chromosome distribution. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl.2, 1–173.
Raikov, I. B., 1973: Mitose intranucleaire acentric du micronoyau deLoxodes magnus, Cilie holotriche. Etude ultrastructurale. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)276, 2385.
Reynolds, E. S., 1963: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electronopaque stain for electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.17, 208–212.
Schwartz, V., 1965: Die Teilungsspindel des Mikronucleus vonParamecium bursaria. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges. Kiel, 123–131.
Sonneborn, T. M., 1964: Methods inParamecium research. In: Methods in cell physiology, Vol. IV (D. M. Prescott, ed.), pp. 241–339. New York: Academic Press.
Stempak, J. G., andR. T. Ward, 1964: An improved staining method for electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.22, 697–698.
Stevenson, I., andF. P. Lloyd, 1971: Ultrastructure of nuclear division inParamecium aurelia. I. Mitosis in the micronucleus. Aust. J. biol. Sci.24, 963–975.
Tilney, L. G., 1975: Actin filaments in the acrosomal reaction ofLimulus sperm. J. Cell Biol.64, 289–310.
Unanue, E. R., 1974: Cellular events following binding of antigen to lymphocytes. Amer. J. Path.77, 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, L.M., Witkus, E.R. & Vernon, G.M. The role of microtubules and microfilaments in the micronucleus ofParamecium bursaria during mitosis. Protoplasma 89, 203–219 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275740
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275740