Skip to main content
Log in

Isozyme patterns in zygotic and somatic embryogenesis of carrot

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isozyme patterns of carrot (Daucus carota L.) zygotic embryos between the torpedo stage up to 5-day-old seedlings have been compared with those of the similar stages from the embryogenic cell suspension culture to the late somatic plantlet. Somatic embryos blocked at the torpedo stage by β-cyclodextrine have also been analyzed. All these stages have been analyzed with respect to seven different enzyme systems: arylesterase, glucosephosphate isomerase, phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, alcohol dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase and phosphoglucomutase (EC 2.7.5.1, PGM). The relationships between the different stages of both types of embryogenesis have been visualized using an unrooted tree. Generally, profiles of somatic embryos were different from those of zygotic embryos. Interestingly however, a typical zygotic embryo pattern was found in the cyclodextrine-blocked somatic embryos. Only aspartate aminotransferase patterns revealed a similarity between zygotic and somatic torpedo embryos. Both plantlet types showed close patterns with common isozymes. Moreover, similarities were evident between somatic plantlets and cell suspensions. A few isozymes appeared to be stage specific markers: esterase 10–11 were specific to achenes and early germination, phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 8 was specific to 4–5 day-old seedlings and phosphoglucomutase 1 and 7 and alcohol dehydrogenase 4 were markers for zygotic embryos. No somatic embryogenesis specific isozyme could be found. We show that patterns can be associated with particular tissue formation: mainly, aspartate aminotransferase 2 and 1, phosphoglucomutase 8 and 9 and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 7 coincided with apical meristem initiation and phosphoglucomutase 4 and 5, zones “b” and “d” of esterase and zone “b” of phosphogluconate dehydrogenase coincided with vascular bundle formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADH:

alcohol dehydrogenase

CD:

β-cyclodextrine

CS:

cell suspension culture

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraaeetie acid

LiBo:

lithium hydroxide/boric acid

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

PVP:

polyvinylpyrrolidone

SEg:

somatic embryo at the globular stage

SEh:

heart stage

SEte:

early torpedo stage

SEtl:

late torpedo stage

SEce:

early cotyledonary stage

SEcl:

late cotyledonary stage

SECD:

somatic embryo blocked at the torpedo stage with β-cyclodextrine

EST:

esterase

GOT:

aspartate aminotransferase

IDH:

isocitrate dehydrogenase

MTT:

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide)

PMS:

phenazonium methosulfate

PGD:

phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

PGI:

glucosephosphate isomerase

PGM:

phosphoglucomutase

SO:

dry seed

S1–3:

seed after 1–3 days of germination

SP1–2:

young and old somatic plantlets

ZE:

zygotic embryo

ZP4–5:

4–5 day-old seedlings

References

  • Allot-Deronne M, Blondon F, Sandmeier M (1986) C R Acad Sci Paris303 Série III: 683–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapat SA, Rawal SK, Mascarenhas A (1992) Plant Science82: 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwale UB, Kerns HR, Widholm JM (1986) Planta167: 473–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppens L, Dewitte D (1990) Plant Science67: 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries SC, Booij H, Janssens R, Vogels R, Saris L, Lo Schiavo F, Terzi M, Van Kammen A (1988a) Gene Dev2: 462–476

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries SC, Booij H, Meyerink P, Huisman G, Wilde D, Thomas TL, Van Kammen A (1988b) Planta176: 196–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodeman VL (1995) Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay

  • Dutta PC, Appelqvist L-A, Gunnarsson S, von Hofsten A (1991) Plant Sci78: 259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Feirer RP, Conkey JH, Verhagen SA (1989) Plant Cell Rep8: 207–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Science155: 279–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gahan PB (1981) Ann Bot48: 769–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res50: 151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb LD (1974) Evolution28: 244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet H, Jullien M (1992) Physiol Plant76: 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kysely W, Myers JR, Lazzeri PA, Collins GB, Jacobsen H-J (1987) Plant Cell Rep6: 305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Vasil V, Vasil IK (1983) Theor Appl Genet66: 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh K (1993) In: Redenbaugh K (ed) Synseeds. CRC Press, London, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert J (1958) Naturwissenschaft45: 344–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass JE (1958) In: Library of congress catalog card number 58-13416 (ed) Botanical microtechnique (Part I). The Iowa Stte University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandalios JC (1969) Rev Biochem Genet3: 37–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Sorensen EL, Liang GH (1990) Plant Cell Rep9: 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung ZR, Okimoto R (1983) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA80: 2661–2665

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward FC, Mapes MO, Smith J (1958) Am J Bot45: 705–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD (1980) Can J Genet Cytol22: 271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos CE (1983) In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding (part A). Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 469–516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. M. Boudet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodeman, V.L., Ducreux, G. Isozyme patterns in zygotic and somatic embryogenesis of carrot. Plant Cell Reports 16, 101–105 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275460

Keywords

Navigation