Skip to main content
Log in

Protoplast culture and plant regeneration ofPinellia ternata

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was undertaken to develop a protoplast regeneration system for pinellia. A yield of 19 29 x 105 protoplasts/g F. W. could be obtained from cell suspension cultures incubated in a digestion enzyme solution with 2% cellulase Onzuka R-10, 10% pectinase (Sigma), 0.01% pectolyase Y23. K8P and modified MS media were used to culture protoplasts in: a) liquid, b) liquid-solid double layer, or c) agarose embedded protoplast culture. The former two were conducive to colony formation from protoplast-derived cells. The frequency of cell division was about 8% after 3 days in culture. Gradually adding fresh medium of lower osmotic pressure into the medium for protoplast culture favored cell division. Calli (1–2 mm in diameter) formed after 30–40 days in culture. The calli transferred onto medium supplemented with KT (0.5 mg 1−1) and NAA (0.2 mg 1)−1) could regenerate plants after 40–50 days. Of 47 plantlets transplanted into plots, 29 flowered and were fertile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

NAA:

α-naphthaleneacetic acid

KT:

kinetin

CH:

casein hydrolysate

References

  • Choi JS, Rha ES (1986) Korean J Crop Sci 31:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Sharp WR (1983) Science 221:949–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu DX, Guo QS (1990) Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 21:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • He YK, Liu G, Lu TG, Sun CS (1994) Acta Bot Sin 36:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1975) Planta 126:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim TS, Lee YT, Jun BT, Park MS, Park SH (1990) Res Rep Rural Dev Adm (Suweon) 32 (Upland-Ind Corps): 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Li LC, Chen YM, Chen Y (1988) Acta Genet Sin 15:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu LF, Lai KL (1985) Ist Congress of Plant Molecular Biology Savannah, Georgia, USA, Oct. 27–Nov.2._ Abstr. P. 11

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata T, Mathias RJ (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11:408–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman D (1939) Biometrika 31:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren JH, Chen KM, Xu R (1983) Plant Physiol Comm4:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen LR, Xue XH, Chen JS (1992) Chin J Chin Mater Med 17: 209

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoyama Y, Hatano K, Nishioka I (1983) Planta Medica 49: 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Su X (1989) Chin J Chin Mater Med 14: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun RY, An XB (ed) (1991) Plant Protoplast Culture, Science Press, Beijing, P. 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay HS, Gau TG, Chen CC (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8:450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu BJ, Xiao L, Qin ZJ (1986) Scient Sin :257–272

  • Yang ZN, Xu ZH, Wei ZM (1994) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 36:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng HC (1980) Chinese Tranditional and Herbal Drugs 11:91–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by W Parrott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, Y., Zhu, C., He, M. et al. Protoplast culture and plant regeneration ofPinellia ternata . Plant Cell Reports 16, 92–96 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275458

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275458

Keywords

Navigation