Skip to main content
Log in

Expression of bacterial isochorismate synthase (EC 5.4.99.6) in transgenic root cultures ofRubia peregrina

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The gene coding for isochorismate synthase (EC 5.4.99.6) was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction fromEscherichia coli, cloned into a binary vector. and mobilised intoAgrobacterium rhizogenes LBA9402 which was used to transformRubia peregrina. Transgenic roots containing bacterial isochorismate synthase cDNA expressed twice as much isochorismate synthase activity (4.88 pkat/mg protein) as the control roots (2.45 pkat/mg protein) after 10 days in culture, and accumulatedca. 20% higher levels of total anthraquinones after 30 days in culture. Whilst the amount of total alizarin (free and bound) in the transgenic roots was 30% higher than in control roots, the level of free alizarin wasca. 85% higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • van den Berg AJJ, Labadie RP (1989) In: Dey PM, Harborne JB (eds) Methods in Plant Biochemistry, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 451–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper J, Scott R (1988) In: Draper J, Scott R, Armitage P, Walden R (eds) Plant Genetic Transformation and Gene Expression. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 199–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50:151–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gleave AP (1992) Plant Mol Biol 20:1203–1207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill JD, Rounsley S, Spencer A, Todd G, Rhodes MJC (1991) Plant Cell Rep 10:221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi R (1992) In: Erlich HA (ed) PCR Technology. Freeman, New York, pp 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc C, Ruhnua P, Leistner E (1991) Plant Cell Rep 10:334–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistner E (1981) In: Conn EE (ed) The Biochemistry of Plants, vol 7. Academic Press, London, pp 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi AH, Charlwood BV (1996) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult (in press).

  • Lodhi AH, Sant'Ana AEG, Charlwood BV (1994) Phytochem Anal 5:261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odake K, Ichi T, Kusahara K (1991) In: Komamine A (ed) Plant Cell Culture in Japan. CMC, Tokyo, pp 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozenberger BA, Brickmann TJ, McIntosh M (1989) J Bacteriol 171:775–783.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen C, Verpoorte R (1991) Phytochem 30:377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen C, van der Heijden R, Verpoorte R (1991) Phytochem 30:2873–2876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki RK (1992) In: Erlich HA (ed) PCR Technology. Freeman, New York, pp 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte U, El-Shagi H, Zenk MH (1984) Plant Cell Rep 3:51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simantiras M, Leistner E (1989) Phytochem 28:1381–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weische A, Leistner E (1985) Tetrahedron Lett 26:1487–1490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. R. Davey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lodhi, A.H., Bongaerts, R.J.M., Verpoorte, R. et al. Expression of bacterial isochorismate synthase (EC 5.4.99.6) in transgenic root cultures ofRubia peregrina . Plant Cell Reports 16, 54–57 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275449

Keywords

Navigation