Marine Geophysical Researches

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 407–425 | Cite as

Accuracy of the spatial representation of the seafloor with bathymetric sidescan sonars

  • Pierre Cervenka
  • Ute Christina Herzfeld
  • Christian De Moustier
Article

Abstract

When isobath maps of the seafloor are constructed with a bathymetric sidescan sonar system the position of each sounding is derived from estimates of range and elevation. The location of each pixel forming the acoustic backscatter image is calculated from the same estimates. The accuracy of the resulting maps depends on the acoustic array geometry, on the performances of the acoustic signal processing, and on knowledge of other parameters including: the platform's navigation, the sonar transducer's attitude, and the sound rays' trajectory between the sonar and the seafloor. The relative importance of these factors in the estimation of target location is assesed. The effects of the platform motions (e.g. roll, pitch, yaw, sway, surge and heave) and of the uncertainties in the elevation angle measurements are analyzed in detail. The variances associated with the representation (orientation and depth) of a plane, rectangular patch of the seafloor are evaluated, depending on the geometry of the patch. The inverse problem is addressed. Its solution gives the lateral dimensions of the spatial filter that must be applied to the bathymetric data to obtain specified accuracies of the slopes and depths. The uncertainty in the estimate of elevation angle, mostly due to the acoustic noise, is found to bring the main error contribution in across-track slope estimates. It can also be critical for along-track slope estimates, overshadowing error contributions due to the platform's attitude. Numerical examples are presented.

Key words

Sidescan sonar target location bathymetry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    de Moustier, C., 1988, State of the Art in Swath Bathymetry Survey Systems,Int. Hyd. Review 65, 25–54.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Moustier, C., 1993, Signal Processing for Swath Bathymetry and Concurrent Seafloor Acoustic Imaging, in: Moura & Lourtie (eds.),Acoustic Signal Processing for Ocean Exploration, NATO ASI, Kluwer, pp. 329–354.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackinton, J. G., 1986, Bathymetric Mapping with SeaMARC II: An Elevation Angle Measuring Side-Scan Sonar System, Ph.D. Dissertation, Hawaii Inst. of Geophys., Univ. of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsumoto, H., Characteristics of SeaMARC II Phase Data,IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 15, 350–360.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masnadi-Shirazi, M. A., de Moustier, C., Cervenka, P., and Zisk, S. H., 1992, Differential Phase Estimation with the SeaMARC II Bathymetric Sidescan Sonar System,IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 17, 239–251.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blackinton, J. G., 1991, Bathymetric Resolution, Precision and Accuracy Considerations for Swath Bathymetry Mapping Sonar Systems, in:Proc. IEEE Oceans '91, Vol. 1, pp. 550–557.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cobra, D. T., 1991, Estimation of Geometric Distortions in Side-Scan Images,Proc. IEEE OES Oceans '91 Conf. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cervenka, P., de Moustier, C., and Lonsdale, P. F., 1990, Pixel Relocation in SeaMARC II Sidescan Sonar Images Based on Gridded Sea Beam Bathymetry,Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union 71, 1407–1408.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cervenka, P., de Moustier, C., and Lonsdale, P. F., 1991, Corrections on SeaMARC II Sidescan Sonar Bathymetry,Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 72, 249.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cervenka, P., de Moustier, C., and Lonsdale, P. F., 1994, Geometric Corrections on Sidescan Sonar Images Based on Bathymetry. Application with SeaMARC II and Sea Beam Data,Marine Geophys. Res. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Cervenka
    • 3
  • Ute Christina Herzfeld
    • 3
  • Christian De Moustier
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Mécanique PhysiqueUniversité Paris VISaint-Cyr-l'EcoleFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Arctic and Alpine ResearchBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of CaliforniaLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations