Advertisement

Environmentalist

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 261–266 | Cite as

Integrators: An outcome of environmental education

  • Ian G. Thomas
Article

Summary

People working in the environmental field may refer to themselves as environmentalists, but this does not indicate how they approach their work. The term ‘environmental integrator’ has been used to describe people who are specialists with breadth, in comparison to generalists with no speciality. The training of integrators involves the integration of knowledge with the teaching of problem solving and ways of dealing with people and complex organisations. A recent evaluation of the Master of Environmental Science programme at Monash University, which has an interdisciplinary focus, provided an opportunity to see if the training of environmental integrators was feasible. A questionnaire survey of graduates, and interviews with a sample of their employers, indicated that the majority of graduates worked as integrators, and valued the broad perspectives and integrative team work opportunities gained through the programme. While it is difficult to define and measure the qualities of integrators, it is apparent that the Monash programme contributed to the training of such people, and that other tertiary programmes could do likewise.

Keywords

Environmental Management Nature Conservation Questionnaire Survey Science Programme Complex Organisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. 1983. Some Issues in Environmental Education.Australian Association for Environmental Education Newsletter, No.8.Google Scholar
  2. Blackmore, J. and Kenway, J. 1988. Rationalisation, instrumentalism and corporate managerialism: The implications for women of the Green Paper in Higher Education.Australian Universities' Review, No.1, pp.42–49.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, D.J. 1988. Flexibility and future labour needs in the light of the Green Paper.Australian Universities' Review, No.1, pp.6–12.Google Scholar
  4. GSES. 1988. Details of Course Graduate School of Environmental Science, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. House, E.R. 1978. Assumptions underlying evaluation models.Educational Researcher, March, pp.4–12.Google Scholar
  6. House, E.R. 1980.Evaluating With Validity. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  7. Maldague, M. 1977., Environmental studies for specialists. In:Trends in Environmental Education. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Stokes, D. and Crawshaw, B. 1986. Teaching strategies for environmental education.Environmentalist,6(1), 35–43.Google Scholar
  9. The Age, 1986. Specialisation Leads to Redundancy: Professor. Thursday, 13 November, p.25.Google Scholar
  10. Thomas, I.G. 1986. Monash Master of Environmental Science Program. In: Barrass, R., Blair, D.J., Garnham, P.H. and Moscardini, A.O. (eds),Environmental Science Teaching and Practice. Emjoc Press, Northallerton, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Yin, R.K. 1984.Case Study Research. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian G. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Melbourne Institue of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations