Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological design criteria for a sustainable Canadian society

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this paper is to develop specific ecological design criteria for a sustainable Canadian society. Ecological design criteria complement socio-political ones which have also been developed by the Sustainable Society Project at the University of Waterloo. The criteria derive from an evaluation of the major areas of human activity and interaction with the natural environment in light of our knowledge of ecological systems and resource management. The criteria, like the Sustainable Society Project as a whole, are an attempt to suggest needed, feasible, medium to long-term changes in human activities to comply with the ecological and socio-political limits and constraints that must be recognized in order to achieve societal sustainability. The specific design criteria identified here are not the only ones possible, desirable, or necessary — a complete and certain list is inherently impossible. But the design criteria developed here are illustrative of the kinds of changes that are necessary to achieve sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberley, D.C. 1985. Bioregionalism: A Territorial Approach to Governance and Development of Northwest British Columbia. Unpublished MA thesis, SCARP, University of British Columbia.

  • Bird, P.M. and Rapports, D.J. 1986.State of the Environment Report for Canada, 263 pp. Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossel, H. 1987. Viability and sustainability: matching development goals to resource constraints.Futures,19(2), 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, S., Millar, S., Newcombe, K. and O'Neill, B. 1981.The Ecology of a City and its People: The Case of Hong Kong, 437 pp. ANU Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B.J., Hanson, M.E., Liverman, D.M. and Meredith, R.W.Jr. 1987. Global sustainability: toward definition.Environ. Management,11, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.R.et al. 1984. TheState of the World. Annual. W.W. Norton and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.A. (ed.). 1983.Natural Systems for Development: What Planners Need to Know. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M.P. 1982. The mature region: building a practical model for the transition to the sustainable society.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,22, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. 1987.Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J.E. 1989. Decision-making for sustainable development: selected approaches to environmental assessment and management.EIA Review,9, 337–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gélinas, R. and Slaats, J. 1989. Selecting Indicators for State of the Environment Reporting. (Draft). SOE Reporting Branch, CWS, Environment Canada, Tech. Report Ser. No.8, 25 pp..

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons.Science,162, 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. 1986.Overview of the Socio-Economic Resource Framework (SERF). Working Paper 86-03-01, Structural Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF. 1980.World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. Gland.

  • Lerner, S. 1990. Socio-Political Design Criteria for a Sustainable Canadian Society. Sustainable Society Project Working Paper No. 3, Department of Environment and Resource Studies, Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D.M., Hanson, M.E., Brown, B.J. and Meredith, R.W.Jr. 1988. Global sustainability: toward measurement.Environ. Management,12(2), 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R.L. 1984. Energy and habitat: designing a sustainable urban ecosystem.Futures,16(4), 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestel, E. 1989.Beyond the Limits to Growth: A Report to the Club of Rome. Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin, N. (ed.). 1986.Ecosystem Theory and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, A.T. 1983.Conceptual Approaches to Human Ecology. East-West Centre Research Report No.14, Honolulu.

  • Rapport, D.J. and Friend, A.M. 1979.Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Statistics: A Stress-Response Approach. Statistics Canada Occasional Paper, Cat.11-510, Ottawa.

  • Ravetz, J.R. 1986. Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. In: Clark, W.C. and Munn, R.E. (eds),Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, pp.415–432. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on Business. 1989. The business outlook.Report on Business,6(1), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. 1988.The Forest and the Trees: A Guide to Excellent Forestry, 257 pp. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.B, Francis, G.R. Legge, and Lerner, S. 1990. Defining a sustainable society: values, principles, and definitions.Alternatives,17(2), 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.B and Van Bers, C. 1991. Exploring a Sustainable Future for Canada. Paper prepared for the conference of the Toronto Chapter of the IEEE Society On Social Implications of Technology. Ryerson Polytechnic Institute, Toronto. 21–22 June, 1991.

  • Staples, L.et al. 1988. Mining the popular wisdom: Yukon 2000 brings a fresh approach to northern economic development.Northern Perspectives,16(2), 32 pp..

  • Statistics Canada, Structural Analysis Division. 1986.Human Activity and the Environment: A Statistical Compendium. Supply and Services, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, G. (ed.). 1989.Outdoor Recreation in Canada. Wiley, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987.Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI and IIED (World Resources Institute and International Institute for Environment and Development). 1986.World Resources. Bi-Annual. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Wilfrid Laurier University, N2L 3C5, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    D. Scott Slocombe & Caroline Van Bers

Authors
  1. D. Scott Slocombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Van Bers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr D. Scott Slocombe is Assistant Professor in the Department of Geography, and Co-Director of the Cold Regions Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University. His principal research interests include ecosystem and regional planning, and management for sustainability.

Caroline Van Bers was Project Manager for the Sustainable Society Project at the University of Waterloo and she received her MA from the School of Urban and Regional Planning at that University. She currently works in the State of the Environment Reporting Branch of Environment Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slocombe, D.S., Van Bers, C. Ecological design criteria for a sustainable Canadian society. Environmentalist 12, 243–254 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267694

Keywords

Search

Navigation