Summary
In part one of this paper (The Environmentalist,1990, pp.301–309) it was shown that conventional economic accounting does not reveal the actual damage to the natural environment, although an ever-increasing share of the Gross National Product is being spent for environmental protection activities. In this, part two of the paper, on the basis of acceptable conventions, the results of an empiric research on ‘defensive expenditures’ in the GNP are presented, again taking the Federal Republic of Germany as an example. The authors would like to see more research of this type in order to understand better the environmental impacts and the structural deficiencies of modern industrial society.
Bibliography
Bartelmus, P. 1987. Beyond GDP: New approaches to applied statistics.The Review of Income and Wealth,33(4), 347–358.
Boulding, K.E. 1949/50. Income or welfare?The Review of Economic Studies,17, 77–86.
Daly, H.E. 1989. Toward a measure of sustainable social net national product. In: Ahmad, Y.J.et al. (eds),Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, pp.25–31, A UNEP-World Bank Symposium, Washington, DC.
Drewnowski, J. 1974.On Measuring and Planning the Quality of Life, The Hague.
Economic Council of Japan. 1974.Report of the NNW Measurement Committee: Measuring Net National Welfare of Japan. Tokyo.
Fisher, I. 1930.The Nature of Capital and Income. New York (original edition 1906).
Hueting, R. and Leipert, C. 1990. Economic growth, national income and the blocked choices for the environment.The Environmentalist,10(1), 25–38.
Isamu, M. 1973. From GNP to NNW — Net National Welfare.The Japan Interpreter,8(1), 109–120.
Juster, Th.F. 1971. On the measurement of economic and social performance.National Bureau of Economic Research, 50th Annual Report, pp.9–24. New York.
Leipert, C. 1989. Social costs of the economic process and national accounts: The example of defensive expenditures.Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics,3(3), 843–856.
Leipert, C. 1990. Die heimlichen Kosten des Fortschritts. Frankfurt a. M.
Leipert, C. and Simonis, U.E. 1990. Environmental damage — environmental expenditure 1: Statistical evidence on the Federal Republic of Germany.The Environmentalist,10(4), 301–309.
Maruo, N. 1974. Measurement of welfare in Japan. A new basis for social planning. In: Simonis, H. and Simonis, U.E. (eds.),Japan. Economic and Social Studies in Development, pp.287–315. Wiesbaden.
Nordhaus, W. and Tobin, J. 1973. Is growth obsolete? In: Moss, M. (ed.),The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, pp.509–532. New York; London.
Peskin, H.M. with Lutz, E. 1990.A Survey of Resource and Environmental Accounting in Industrialized Countries. The World Bank, Environment Department, Washington, DC.
Repetto, R. 1989. Nature's resources as productive assets.Challenge, Sept–Oct, pp.16–20.
Stewart, K. 1974. National income accounting and economic welfare. The concepts of GNP and MEW.Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review,56, 18–22.
United Nations. 1984.A Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics, Statistical Papers. Series M, No.78, New York.
United Nations, Statistical Office. 1990.SNA Handbook on Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Preliminary Draft of the Part I: General Concepts, New York.
Uno, K. 1989. Economic growth and environmental change in Japan. Net National Welfare and beyond. In: Archibugi, F. and Nijkamp, P. (eds.),Economy and Ecology. Towards Sustainable Development. pp.307–332, Dordrecht.
Wagar, J.A. 1970. Growth versus the quality of life.Science,168, 1179–1184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr Christian Leipert and Professor Udo E. Simonis have contributed frequently toThe Environmentalist (see 1989, pp.171–183; 1990, pp.25–38; 1990, pp.301–309). Dr Leipert is research fellow, Dr Simonis is research professor at the environmental policy unit of the Science Center Berlin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leipert, C., Simonis, U.E. Environmental damage — environmental expenditure 2: Statistical evidence on the Federal Republic of Germany. Environmentalist 11, 213–216 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263234
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263234