Summary
The impact of environmental regulations on the welfare of Malaysian palm oil growers, producers, and refiners are evaluated in an open-economy model. The estimated incremental effects of effluent standards and changes have been specifically rather small, with the exception of those upon the growers, but the cumulative effects have been considerable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, P.C. and Haley S.L. 1988. International trade theory and natural resource concepts. In: Sutton, J.D. (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources: Discovering the Critical Linkages. Boulder, USA.
Brown, R.S., Caves, D.W. and Christensen, L.R. 1979. Modelling the structure of cost and production for multiproduct firms.Southern Economic Journal,46, 256–273.
Christensen, L.R. and Jorgenson, D.W. 1969. The measurement of US real capital input, 1929–1967.The Review of Income and Wealth,4, 293–320.
D'Arge, R.C. 1971. International trade, domestic income, and environmental controls: some empirical estimates. In: Kneese, A.V., Rolfe, S.E. and Harned, J.V. (eds),Managing the Environment: International Economic Cooperation for Pollution Control. New York.
Diewert, W.E. 1974. Application of duality theory. In: Intriligator, M. and Kendrick, D. (eds),Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol.II. Amsterdam.
Kemp, M.C. and Long N.V. 1984. The role of natural resources in trade models. In: Jones, R.W. and Kenen, P.B. (eds),Handbook of International Economics, Vol.1. Amsterdam.
Khalid, A.R. 1989. Trade and Welfare Effects of Unilateral Environmental Regulation: the Case of Malaysian Palm Oil. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.
Magee, S.P. and Ford, W.F. 1972. Environmental pollution, the terms of trade and balance of payments of the United States.Kyklos,25, 101–118.
Majocchi, A. 1972. The impact of environmental measures on international trade: some policy issues. In:Problems of Environmental Economics. Paris.
McFadden, D. 1970. Cost, revenue and profit functions. In:Production Economics: a Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Amsterdam.
Mutti, J.H. and Richardson, J.D. 1977. International competitive displacement from environmental control: the quantitative gains from methodological refinement.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,4, 135–152.
Public Research Institute. 1976. The Effects of Effluent Discharge Limitations on Foreign Trade in Selected Industries. Report to the US National Commission on Water Quality, Arlington VA, February.
Richardson, J.D. and Mutti, J.H. 1976. Industrial displacement through environmental controls: the international competitive aspects. In: Walter, I. (ed.),Studies in International Environmental Economics, 57–102.
Runge, F.C., Houck, J.P. and Halbach, D.W. 1988. Implications of environmental regulations for competitiveness in agricultural trade. In: Sutton, J.D. (ed.),Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources: Discovering the Critical Linkages. Boulder, USA.
Sutton, J.D. (ed.) 1988.Agricultural Trade and Natural Resources: Discovering the Critical Linkages. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, USA.
Walter, I. 1976.Studies in International Environmental Economics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Yohe, G.W. 1979. The backward incidence of pollution control — some comparative statics in general equilibrium.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,8, 187–198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr Khalid Abdul Rahim is a member of staff in the Department of Natural Resource Economics at the Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. This article is based on part of the work undertaken for his PhD dissertation at the University of Illinois, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahim, K.A. Internalisation of externalities: Who bears the cost of pollution control?. Environmentalist 11, 19–25 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263193
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263193