Abstract
Longitudinal data are used to examine the relation between young adult women's abortion experience and a variety of antecedent and subsequent personality, perceived environment, and behavior variables. About one-quarter of the women in two separate samples reported that they had had an abortion. Bivariate analyses show that young adult women who have had an abortion are characterized by greater psychosocial unconventionality than women who have not had an abortion. Similar differences along an underlying dimension of conventionality-unconventionality distinguish, antecedent to the abortion experience, women who would later have an abortion from those who would not. The findings are consistent with the expectations of Problem-Behavior Theory (Jessor & Jessor, 1977).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chilman, C. S. (1980).Adolescent sexuality in a changing American society: Social and psychological perspectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Greydanus, D. E. (1983). Abortion in adolescence. In E. R. McAnarney (Ed.),Premature adolescent pregnancy and parenthood. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Handy, J. A. (1982). Psychological and social aspects of induced abortion.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 29–41.
Henshaw, S. K., Forrest, J. D., Sullivan, E., & Tietze, C. (1982). Abortion services in the United States, 1979 and 1980.Family Planning Perspectives, 14(1), 5–15.
Henshaw, S. K., & Martire, G. (1982). Abortion and the public opinion polls.Family Planning Perspectives, 14(2), 53–62.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977).Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1984). Adolescence to young adulthood: A twelve-year prospective study of problem behavior and psychosocial development. In S. A. Mednick & M. Harway (Eds.),Longitudinal research in the United States. New York: Praeger.
McAnarney, E. R., & Schreider, C. (1984).Identifying social and psychological antecedents of adolescent pregnancy: The contribution of research to concepts of prevention. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.
Mindick, B., & Oskamp, S. (1982). Individual differences among adolescent contraceptors: Some implications for intervention. In I. R. Stuart & C. F. Wells (Eds.).Pregnancy in adolescence: Needs, problems, and management. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 140–176.
Newman, S. H. (1973). Abortion: Needed behavioral-social research. In H. J. Osofsky and J. D. Osofsky (Eds.).The abortion experience: Psychological and medical impact. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
Olson, L. (1980). Social and psychological correlates of pregnancy resolution among adolescent women: A review.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50(3), 432–445.
Oskamp. S., & Mindick, B. (1983). Personality and attitudinal barriers to contraception. In D. Byrne & W. A. Fisher (Eds.).Adolescents, sex and contraception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 65–107.
Osofsky, J. D., & Osofsky, H. J. (1973). Psychological effects of abortion: With emphasis upon immediate reactions and followup. In H. J. Osofsky & J. D. Osofsky (Eds.).The abortion experience: Psychological and medical impact. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
Steinhoff, P. G. (1973). Background characteristics of abortion patients. In H. J. Osofsky & J. D. Osofsky (Eds.).The abortion experience: Psychological and medical impact. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is a report from the Young Adult Follow-Up Study (R. Jessor, princial investigator) supported by Grant No. AA-03745 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
We are grateful to Dr. Lee Jessor for her contribution to the overall longitudinal project and to several of the measures employed in this report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa, F., Jessor, R. & Donovan, J.E. Psychosocial correlates and antecedents of abortion: An exploratory study. Popul Environ 9, 3–22 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263119