Skip to main content
Log in

Migration psychology: New behavioral models

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Migration is a topic that links the interests of population psychologists and environmental psychologists. The past two decades have witnessed important developments in psychologically-oriented studies of migration behavior. New decision making models that incorporate place perceptions and motivational constructs provide a context for the studies of migration intentions and behavior collected in this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, E.B. (Ed.) (1969).Behavior in new environments: Adaptation of migrant populations. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, J.A., Garkovich, L.E., & Taylor, G.S. (1983). Proruralism values and migration behavior.Population and Environment, 3 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Vanzo, J. (1981). Microeconomic approaches to studying migration decisions. In G.F. De Jong, & R.W. Gardner, (Eds.),Migration decision making (pp. 90–129). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G.F., & Fawcett, J.T. (1981). Motivations for migration: An assessment and a value-expectancy research model. In G.F. De Jong, and R. W. Gardner, (Eds.)Migration decision-making (pp. 13–58). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G.F., & Gardner, R.W. (1981).Migration decision-making. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats, J. (1983). Spatial choice and constraints on behavior.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73 340–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J.T., & De Jong, G.F. (1982). Reasons for moving and migration behavior. In U.N., ESCAP,National Migration Surveys, Vol. 10 (pp. 109–131). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, S.E. (1982).Migration survey methodologies: A review of design issues. Liege: Papers of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, No. 20.

  • Goldsmith, H.C., & Beegle, J.A. (1962).The initial phase of voluntary migration. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Rural Sociology Studies, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S., & Goldstein, A. (1981).Surveys of migration in developing countries. Honolulu: Papers of the East-West Population Institute, No. 71.

  • Haberkorn, G. The migration decision-making process: Some social-psychological considerations. In G.F. De Jong, & R.W. Gardner (Eds.),Migration decision making (pp. 252–278). New York: Pergamon.

  • Krupat, E. (1980) Social psychology and urban behavior.Journal of Social Issues, 36 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S., & Guest, A.M. (1985). Constraints, satisfaction, and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered.Demography, 22 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951).Field theory in the social sciences. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K.E. (1984). Explaining migration intentions and destination selection.Professional Geographer, 36 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmedo, E.L. (1979). Acculturation: A psychometric perspective.American Psychologist, 34 1061–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1974).British immigrants and Australia: A psycho-social inquiry. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, P.N. (1976). Explanations of migration.Annual Review of Sociology, 2 363–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, C.C. (1983). A framework for the study of migration destination selection.Population and Environment, 3 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (1955).Why families move. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, S.A., & Hankin, J. (Eds.). (1984). Special Issue on Attachment to Place.Population and Environment, 7(2)(whole issue).

  • Sell, R.R., & De Jong, G.F. (1978). Toward a motivational theory of migration decision making.Journal of Population, 1 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility.Demography, 11 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (Ed.) (1977).Perspectives on environment and behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.C. (1969). Migration and motivation: A study of determinants and types. In J.A. Jackson (Ed.),Migration (pp. 99–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959).The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate.Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 15 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition.Geographical Review, 61 219–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuiches, J.J. (1980). Residential preferences in migration theory. In D.L. Brown, & J.M. Wardwell (Eds.),.New directions in urban-rural migration (pp. 163–188). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fawcett, J.T. Migration psychology: New behavioral models. Popul Environ 8, 5–14 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263014

Keywords

Navigation