Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 73–85 | Cite as

Discovery of sporothecae in adult femaleTrochometridium Cross, with notes on analogous structures inSiteroptes Amerling (Acari: Heterostigmata)

  • Evert E. Lindquist
Article

Abstract

Adult female mites of the genusTrochometridium Cross possess a pair of internal sacs between the bases of legs III and IV, which are adapted for carrying spores, apparently ascospores, of an undetermined fungus. A three-way symbiotic relationship exists between the mite, the fungus, and various bees (and possibly other holometabolous insects) which nest in relatively dry alkaline soils. The mite transports spores of the fungus to suitable sites for germination — cells of ground-nesting bees containing a bee egg or young larva which dies as a result of development of the fungus and mite. The mite may also stimulate mycelial growth, possibly by killing the young bee or by secreting a substance when feeding. The fungus provides the preferred mycelial substrate on which the mite feeds and undergoes its life cycle. This mutualistic association between the mite and fungus is at the expense of the bee, which transports the other two entities to favorable sites for their development — its newly made and provisioned cells. The sporothecae and specialized association ofTrochometridium mites with a fungal pathogen or saprophyte of another host organism are compared with those ofSiteroptes mites, which are considerably better understood.

Keywords

Mycelial Growth Analogous Structure Alkaline Soil Symbiotic Relationship Host Organism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfaro, A., 1946. El ácaroPediculopsis graminum Reut. y el hongoNigrospora oryzae (Berk. et Br.) Petch., en asociación parasitaria sobre trigos aragoneses. Bol. Patol. Veg. Entomol. Agríc. Madrid, 14: 321–334.Google Scholar
  2. Batra, L.R., Batra, S.W.T. and Bohart, G.E., 1973. The mycoflora of domesticated and wild bees (Apoidea). Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl., 49: 13–44.Google Scholar
  3. Bridges, J.R. and Moser, J.C., 1983. Role of two phoretic mites in transmission of bluestain fungus,Ceratocystis minor. Ecol. Entomol., 8: 9–12.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, K.W., 1940. Relations ofPediculopsis graminum andFusarium poae to central bud rot of carnations. Phytopathology, 30: 853–859.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, E.A., 1965. The generic relationships of the family Pyemotidae (Acarina: Trombidiformes). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull., 45: 29–275.Google Scholar
  6. Cross, E.A. and Bohart, G.E., 1969. Phoretic behavior of four species of alkali bee mites as influenced by season and host sex. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc., 42: 195–219.Google Scholar
  7. Cross, E.A. and Bohart, G.E., 1979. Some observations on the habits and distribution ofTrochometridium Cross, 1965 (Acarina: Pyemotidae). Acarologia, 20: 286–293.Google Scholar
  8. Fennell, D.I., 1973. Chapter 4 — Plectomycetes; Eurotiales. In: G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman (Editors), The Fungi — An Advanced Treatise. Academic Press, New York, London, pp. 45–68.Google Scholar
  9. Hawksworth, D.L., Sutton, B.C. and Ainsworth, G.C., 1983. Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi. 7th ed. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, xii+445 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Krantz, G.W., 1957.Dolichocybe keiferi, a new genus and a new species of pyemotid mite, with a description of a new species ofSiteroptes (Acarina: Pyemotidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 50: 259–264.Google Scholar
  11. Krantz, G.W., 1978. A Manual of Acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Corvallis, OR, viii+509 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Laemmlen, F.F. and Hall, D.H., 1973. Interdependence of a mite,Siteroptes reniformis, and a fungus,Nigrospora oryzae, in the Nigrospora lint rot of cotton. Phytopathology, 63: 308–315.Google Scholar
  13. Lindquist, E.E., 1983. Some thoughts on the potential for use of mites in biological control, including a modified concept of “parasitoids”. In: M.A. Hoy, G.L. Cunningham and L. Knutson (Editors), Biological Control of Pests by Mites. Univ. Calif., Div. Agric. Nat. Resources, Special Publ. No. 3304, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
  14. Lindquist, E.E., 1986. The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic and systematic revision, with a reclassification of familygroup taxa in the heterostigmata. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., in press.Google Scholar
  15. Mahunka, S., 1966. Zwei neue Arten aus der Gruppe Tarsonemini aus China (Acari). Vestn. Cesk, Spol. Zool., 30: 315–318.Google Scholar
  16. Mahunka, S., 1970a. Considerations on the systematics of the Tarsonemina and the description of new European taxa (Acari: Trombidiformes). Acta Zool. Acad. Sci., Hung., 16: 137–174.Google Scholar
  17. Mahunka, S., 1970b. Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei. 227. Acari: Pygmephoroidea. Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hung., 62: 343–362.Google Scholar
  18. Moser, J.C., Cross, E.A. and Roton, L.M., 1971. Biology ofPyemotes parviscolyti (Acarina: Pyemotidae). Entomophaga, 16: 367–379.Google Scholar
  19. Moser, J.C., Kielczewski, Wisniewski, J. and Balazy, S., 1978. EvaluatingPyemotes dryas (Vitzthum 1923) (Acari: Pyemotidae) as a parasite of the southern pine beetle. Int. J. Acarol., 4: 67–70.Google Scholar
  20. OConnor, B.M., 1984. Acarine—fungal relationships: the evolution of symbiotic associations. In: Q. Wheeler and M. Blackwell (Editors), Fungus—Insect Relationships: Perspectives in Ecology and Evolution. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, pp. 354–381.Google Scholar
  21. Rozen, J.G., Jr., 1958. Monographic study of the genusNomadopsis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Univ. Calif., Berkeley, Publ. Entomol. 15: 1–202.Google Scholar
  22. Seemüller, E., 1968. Untersuchungen über die morphologische und biologische Differenzierung in derFusarium-SektionSporotrichiella. Mitt. Biol. Bundesanst. Land Forstwirtsch. Berlin-Dahlem, 127, 93 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Shinn, A.F., 1967. A revision of the bee genusCalliopsis and the biology and ecology ofC. andreniformis (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull., 46: 753–936.Google Scholar
  24. Su, T.Z., Beng, G.Y. and Chen, X.D., 1979. Zhong goo sui man shu chu ji. [Notes on the genusSiteroptes in China.] (Acarina: Pyemotidae). Acta Zootaxon. Sinica, 4: 162–169 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
  25. Su, T.Z., Chen, X.D. and Beng, C.Y., 1981. He gu sui fu bing zhong sui man tu bing yuan jun gong sheng guan xi di yan jiu. (The symbiotic relationships between mites and fungi in the ear rot of grasses.] Acta Phytopathol. Sinica, 11: 19–24 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
  26. Suski, Z.W., 1973. A revision ofSiteroptes cerealium (Kirchner) complex (Acarina, Heterostigmata, Pyemotidae). Ann. Zool. (Warsaw), 30: 509–535.Google Scholar
  27. Sussman, A.S., 1966. Types of dormancy as represented by conidia and ascospores ofNeurospora. In: M.F. Madelin (Editor), The Fungus Spore. Butterworths, London, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evert E. Lindquist
    • 1
  1. 1.Biosystematics Research InstituteAgriculture CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations