Skip to main content
Log in

Hemagglutinin inhibition with ether-treated antigen as a more sensitive method to measure the immunological response to an asian influenza virus vaccine

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The appearance of antibodies in the sera of 31 adults receiving a monovalent formalin-inactivated Asian influenza virus vaccine, in August-September 1957, has been studied by complement fixation (CF) and hemagglutinin-inhibition (HI) tests.

When crude allantoic fluid antigen of the pure egg line of A/Japan/305/57 virus was used in the HI tests, none of the 31 paired sera tested showed any significant titer rise. On the other hand, with ether treated virus of the same line as antigen, 16 paired sera out of 31 gave a significant (fourfold or higher) HI titer rise.

Significant CP titer rises were observed in 5 out of 17 paired sera tested. Ether treatment of the antigen did not increase the sensitivity of the CF tests.

CF titer rises against the “soluble antigen” extracted from the virus by ether treatment were observed in 5 paired sera out of 15 tested.

Ether treatment of the virus also increased the sensitivity of HI tests performed with 4 sera from individuals recovering from natural Asian influenza infection.

Treatment of the virus with ethyl ether prior to its use in the HI tests did not alter the specificity of the reaction, as shown by control HI tests with ether treated PR 8 or Swine S-15 viruses.

The possible mechanisms of the increased sensitivity of HI tests with ether treated virus antigen are discussed. It is suggested that ether treatment of the virus removed an excess of “soluble antigen” coating the virus particles, which may have interfered in the reaction between the hemagglutinins and the hemagglutimn-inhibiting antibodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salk, J. E. andA. M. Laurent: J. Exptl. Med.95, 429 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francis, T. Jr.: Bull. World Health Org.8, 725 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hennessy, A. V., E. Minuse, F. M. Davenport, andT. Francis Jr.: Amer. J. Hyg.58, 165 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davenport, F. M. andA. V. Hennessy: J. Exptl. Med.106, 835 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meiklejohn, G.: Amer. J. Hyg.67, 9 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, H. M. Jr., M. R. Hilleman, M. L. Miesse, I. P. Crawford, andA. S. Bankhead: Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.95, 609 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen, K. E.: J.A.M.A.164, 2025 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhdanov, V. M., L. Y. Zakstelskaya, V. E. Yefimova, M. A. Yachno, andS. L. Khait: J.A.M.A.167, 1469 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diagnostic Proce dures for Virus and Rickettsial Diseases, 2nd ed., Amer. Publ. Health Assoc., New York City, 1956, pp. 241–262.

  10. Tokuda, M.: J. Immunol.81, 107 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mulder, J., J. van der Veen, J. J. Brans, andS. W. Enserink: Ant. van Leeuwenhoek, J. of Microbiol.15, 125 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  12. van der Veen, J. andJ. Mulder: Onderz. en Med. Uit. Het. Inst. v. Praev. Genees. 1950, No. 6, Leiden: Stenfertkroese.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berlin, B. S., E. Minuse, A. V. Hennessy, andF. M. Davenport: Fed. Proc.17, 505 (1958) (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levy, A. H. andR. R. Wagner: Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.98, 357 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoyle, L.: Jour. Hygiene (Camb).48, 277 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyle, L.: Jour. Hygiene (Camb.)50, 229 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoyle, L., R. Reed, andW. T. Astbury: Nature (London)171, 256 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davenport, F. M., R. Rott, andW. Schäfer: Fed. Proc.18, 563 (1959) (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lief, F. S. andW. Henle: Virology2, 753 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, O. C., G. M. Bayne, andW. P. Boger: Fed. Proc.18, 581 (1959) (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jordan, W. S. Jr., F. W. Denny Jr., G. F. Badger, C. Curtiss, J. H. Dingle, R. Oseasohn, andD. A. Stevens: Amer. J. Hyg.68, 190 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davenport, F. M.: Publ. Health Rep.73, 133 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hilleman, M. R., F. J. Flatley, S. A. Anderson, M. L. Luecking, andD. J. Levinson: J.A.M.A.166, 1134 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

WHO Fellow at the Harvard University School of Public Health, temporarily working in the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner, G.H., Sharma, R. & Gogolski, L. Hemagglutinin inhibition with ether-treated antigen as a more sensitive method to measure the immunological response to an asian influenza virus vaccine. Archiv f Virusforschung 10, 7–18 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258764

Keywords

Navigation