Résumé
Les auteurs distinguent 8 types cellulaires dans l'EpongeOphlitaspongia seriata (Grant) en réorganisation après dissociation. Ils décrivent leur comportement au cours de la réorganisation, leur ultrastructure et leurs capacités de différenciation.
Les cellules globifères sont particulièrement remarquables par leurs nombreuses inclusions cytoplasmiques tubulaires de 70 mμ.
Bibliographie
Agrell, I.: Observations on cell differentiation in sponges. Ark. Zool. (Stockh.), Sér. II,2, 519–523 (1951).
—: Enzymes and cell differentiation in sponges. Ark. Zool. (Stockh.), Sér. II,3, 325–331 (1952).
Brien, P.: La réorganisation de l'éponge après la dissociation par filtration et phénomènes d'involution chezEphydatia fluviatilis (L.). Arch. Biol. (Liège),48, 185–268 (1937).
Brondsted, H. V.: Entwicklungsphysiologische Studien überSpongilla lacustris L. Acta zool. (Stockh.)17, 75–172 (1936).
Curtis, A. S. G.: Pattern and mechanism in the reaggregation of sponges. Nature (Lond.)196 (4851), 245–248 (1962).
Fauré-Fremiet, E.: Etude histologique deFiculina ficus (L.). Arch. Anat. micr. Morph. exp.27, 421–448 (1931).
—: Morphogénèse experimentale et restitution chezFiculina ficus (L.). Arch. Anat. micr. Morph. exp.28, 121–157 (1932).
Galtsoff, P. S.: Regeneration after dissociation. I. Behaviour of dissociated cells ofMicrociona prolifera Ver. under normal and altered conditions. J. exp. Zool.42, 183–221 (1925).
—: Regeneration after dissociation. II. Histogenesis ofMicrociona prolifera Ver. J. exp. Zool.42, 223–251 (1925).
—, etV. Pertzoff: Some physicochemical properties of dissociated sponge cells. J. gen. Physiol.10, 239–255 (1926).
Ganguly, E.: The differentiating capacity of dissociated sponge cells. Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org.152, 22–34 (1960).
Glauert, A. M., etR. H. Glauert: Araldite as embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.4, 191–194 (1958).
Humphreys, T.: Chemical dissolution and in vitro reconstruction of sponge cell adhesions. I. Isolation and functional demonstration of the components involved. Develop. Biol.8, 27–47 (1963).
Huxley, J. S.: Some phenomena of regeneration inSycon. Phil. Trans. B202, 165–190 (1911).
—: Differences in viability in different types of regenerates from dissociated sponges, with a note on entry of some somatic cells by spermatozoa. Biol. Bull.40, 127–129 (1921).
Moscona, A. A.: Studies on cell aggregation: demonstration of materials with selective cell-binding activity. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)49 (5), 742–748 (1963).
Müller, K.: Das Regenerationsvermögen der Süßwasserschwämme. Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org.32, 397–446 (1911).
Simons, J. R.: The adhesion and coalescence of sponge cells after dissociation. Proc. Linnean Soc. N. S. Wales88, 28–34 (1963).
Simpson, T. L.: The biology of the marine spongeMicrociona prolifera (Ellis andSolander) I. A. study of cellular function and differentiation. J. exp. Zool.154, 134–151 (1963).
Spiegel, M.: The rôle of specific surface antigens in cell adhesion. I. The reaggregation of sponge cells. Biol. Bull.107, 130–140 (1954).
—: The reaggregation of dissociated sponge cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.60 (7), 1056–1076 (1955).
Tuzet, O., etR. Connes: Recherches histologiques sur la reconstitution deSycon raphanus Schmidt, à partir des cellules dissociées. Vie et Milieu13, 703–710 (1962).
—, etM. Pavans de Ceccaty: La mobilisation en amoebocytes des cellules desHalisarca (Eponges siliceuses). Les Polyblastes chez les éponges. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris)149, 799–801 (1955).
Wilson, H. V.: On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J. exp. Zool.5, 245–258 (1907).
—: Development of sponges from dissociated tissue cells. U.S. Bur. Fisheries Bull.30, 1–30 (1911).
—, andJ. T. Penney: The regeneration of sponges (Microciona) from dissociated cells. J. exp. Zool.56, 72–134 (1930).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borojevic, R., Levi, C. Etude au microscope electronique des cellules de l'eponge:Ophlitaspongia seriata (Grant), au cours de la réorganisation après dissociation. Z.Zellforsch 64, 708–725 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258544
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01258544