Advertisement

Alternative Lifestyles

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 291–309 | Cite as

Relative involvement, inadequacy, and jealousy

A test of a causal model
  • Gregory L. White
Article

Abstract

Romantic jealousy is defined as a reaction to a perceived threat to self and/or relationship. Based on the concepts of comparison level and comparison level for alternatives, and guided by the concepts of primary and secondary appraisal processes in coping with stress, a causal model of jealously is presented. This model was tested based on responses of 150 romantically involved couples to a survey. A slightly revised model was found to predict the observed correlations among model variables fairly well for both males and females. In the revised model greater relative involvement in the relationship and perceived inadequacy as a partner independently and directly cause jealousy. These two primary appraisal variables indirectly affect jealousy through the operation of two global secondary appraisal variables: noticing and worrying. A distinction is drawn between threat based on comparison and threat based on partner's evaluation of oneself. Both types of threat may be either acute or chronic.

Keywords

Social Policy Model Variable Social Issue Comparison Level Causal Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASHER, H. B. (1976) Causal Modeling. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. BERSCHEID, E. and E. WALSTER (1974) “Physical attractiveness,” in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. BLAU, P. M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. BOHM, E. (1961) “Jealousy,” in A. Ellis and A. Abarbanel (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 1. New York: Hawthorn.Google Scholar
  5. BURGESS, B. W. and P. WALLIN (1953) Engagement and Marriage. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  6. CLANTON, G. and L. G. SMITH (1977) Jealousy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. COSTNER, H. L. and R. SCHOENBERG (1973) “Diagnosing indicator ills in multiple indicator models,” in A. S. Goldberger and O. D. Duncan (eds.) Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar.Google Scholar
  8. CROWNE, D. and D. MARLOWE (1964) The Approval Motive. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. DARWIN, C. R. (1888) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Hurst.Google Scholar
  10. DUNCAN, O. D. (1975) Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. FENICHEL, O. (1955) The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. FREUD, S. (1955) Some Neurotic Mechanisms in Jealousy, Paranoia, and Homosexuality. Standard Edition, Vol. 18. London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published 1934.)Google Scholar
  13. GRUDER, C. L. (1977) “Choice of comparison persons in evaluating oneself,” in J. M. Suls and R. L. Miller (eds.) Social Comparison Processes. New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  14. HILL, C. T., Z. RUBIN, and A. PEPLAU (1976) “Breakups before marriage: the end of 103 affairs.” J. of Social Issues 32: 147–168.Google Scholar
  15. JONES, E. (1930) “Jealousy.” Die Psychoanalytische Bewegung 2.Google Scholar
  16. JONES, S. C. (1973) “Self and interpersonal evaluations: esteem theories versus consistency theories.” Psych. Bull. 79: 185–199.Google Scholar
  17. JOERESKOG, K. G. and D. SOERBOM (1976) Lisrel III: Estimation of Linear Structural Equation Systems by Maximum-likelihood Methods. Chicago: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar
  18. KLEIN, M. (1957) Envy and Gratitude: A Study of Unconscious Processes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. —— and J. RIVIERE (1964) Love, Hate and Reparation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. LAZARUS, R. S. (1966) Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. —— J. R. AVERILL, and E. M. OPTON, Jr. (1970) “Toward a cognitive theory of emotion,” in M. Arnold (ed.) Feelings and Emotions. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. MEAD, M. (1931) “Jealousy: primitive and civilized,” in S. D. Schmalhausen and V. F. Calverton (eds.) Woman's Coming of Age. New York: Horace Liveright.Google Scholar
  23. NUNALLY, J. C. (1967) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. ROBINSON, J. R. and P. R. SHAVER (1973) Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  25. ROSENBERG, M. (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  26. RUBIN, Z. (1970) “Measurement of romantic love.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 16: 265–273.Google Scholar
  27. SCOTT, W. A. (1968) “Attitude measurement,” in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. SIMMEL, G. (1950) The Sociology of George Simmel (Kurt Wolff, ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. SPIELMAN, P. M. (1971) “Envy and jealousy.” Psychoanalytic Q. 40: 59–82.Google Scholar
  30. THIBAUT, J. W. and H. H. KELLEY (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. WALLER, W. and R. HILL (1951) The Family. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
  32. WESTERMARCK, E. (1936) The Future of Marriage in Western Civilization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. WHITE, G. L. (1980) “Physical attractiveness and courtship progress.” J. of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 660–669.Google Scholar
  34. -- (1981a) Jealousy and motives attributed to partner for attraction to another.” Social Psychology Q.Google Scholar
  35. -- (1981b) “A model of romantic jealousy.” Motivation and Emotion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sage Publications, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory L. White
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations