Skip to main content
Log in

User modelling in interactive explanations

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I consider how user modelling can be used to improve the provision of complex explanations, and discuss in detail the user modelling component of the EDGE explanation system. This allows a user model to be both updated and used in an explanatory dialogue with the user. The model is updated based on the interactions with the user, relationships between concepts and a reviseable expertise level. The model in turn influences the planning of the explanation, allowing a more understandable explanation to be generated. I argue that both user modelling and an “interactive” style of presentation are important for explanations to be acceptable and understandable, and that each reinforces the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breuker, J., R. Winkels and J. Sandberg: 1987, ‘A Shell for Intelligent Help Systems’. In:Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawsey, A.: 1993a,Explanation and Interaction: The Computer Generation of Explanatory Dialogues. MIT Press.

  • Cawsey, A.: 1993b, ‘Planning Interactive Explanations’.International Journal of ManMachine Studies 38, 169–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappel, H. and B. Cahour: 1991, ‘User Modelling for Multi-Modal Cooperative Dialogue with KBS’. Technical report, Deliverable d3 of Esprit Project P2474: MMI2.

  • Chin, D.: 1989, ‘Knome: Modelling What the User Knows in UC’. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.),User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 74–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W.J.: 1979, ‘Tutoring Rules for Guiding a Case Method Dialog’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 11, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rosis, F., N. de Cardis and S. Pizzutilo: 1993, ‘User Tailored Hypermedia Explanations’. In: INTERCHI '93 Adjunct Proceedings, pp. 169–170.

  • Desmaris, M.C. J. Lui: 1993, ‘Exploring the Applications of User-Expertise Assignment for Intelligent Interfaces’. In: INTERCHI '93 Conference Proceedings, pp. 308–313.

  • Greer, J., M. Mark and G.I. McCalla: 1989, ‘Incorporating granularity-based recognition into scent’. In: D. Bierman, J. Breuker and J. Sandberg (eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 107–115.

  • Hartley, R. and M. Smith: 1988, ‘Question Answering and Explanation Giving in Online Help Systems’. In: J. Self (ed.),Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning. Chapman and Hall, pp. 38–360.

  • Huang, X., G.I. McCalla, J.E. Greer and E. Neufeld: 1991, ‘Revising Deductive Knowledge and Stereotype Knowledge in a Student Model’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1(1), 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. Sparck: 1991, ‘Tailoring the Output to the User: What Does User Modelling in Generation Mean’. In:Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R.: 1989, ‘Student Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Implications for User Modeling’. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.),User Modeling in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R.: 1991, ‘Building a User Model Implicitly from a Cooperative Advisory Dialogue’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1, 203–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobsa, A. and W. Wahlster (eds.): 1989,User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybury, M.T.: 1990,Planning Multisentential English Text Using Communicative Acts. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1990. Published as technical report RADC-TR-411, Rome Air Development Center, Rome, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, G.I.: 1993, ‘The Central Importance of Student Modelling to Intelligent Tutoring’. In: E. Costa (ed.),New Directions in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer Verlag, pp. 108–131.

  • McKeown, K.R.: 1985,Text Generation: Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge University Press.

  • McKeown, K.R.: 1988, ‘Generating Goal-Oriented Explanations’.International Journal of Expert Systems Research and Applications 4, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D. and C. Paris: 1992, ‘Exploiting User Feedback to Compensate for the Unreliability of User Models’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2, 287–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D. and W.R. Swartout: 1990, ‘Pointing: A Way Towards Explanation Dialogue’. In: Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D.: 1991, ‘A Reacting Approach to Explanation: Taking the User Feedback into Account’. In:Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, pp. 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C.L.: 1989, ‘The Use of Explicit User Models in a Generation System for Tailoring Answers to the User's Level of Expertise’. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.),User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 200–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peachey, D.R. and G.I. McCalla: 1986, ‘Using Planning Techniques in Intelligent Tutoring Systems’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24, 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, E., C. Mellish and J. Levine: 1992, ‘Automatic Generation of On-Line Documentation in the IDAS Project’. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, E.: 1990, ‘Generating Descriptions that Exploit a User's Domain Knowledge’. In: R. Dale, C. Mellish and M. Zock (eds.),Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press.

  • Self, J.: 1988, ‘Bipassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling’. In:Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS-88), pp. 18–24.

  • Shifroni, E. and B. Shanon: 1992, ‘Interactive User Modeling: An Intergrative Explicit-Implicit Approach’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2 (4), 331–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, D.: 1985, ‘UMFE: A User Modelling Front End Subsystem’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D.D.: 1992, ‘A Task-Appropriate Hybrid Architecture for Explanation’.Computational Intelligence 7, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.W. and E.H. Shortliffe: 1985, ‘Customised Explanations Using Causal Knowledge. In: B.G. Buchanan and Shortliffe (eds.),Rule Based Expert Systems. Addison Wesley, pp. 371–390.

  • Weiner, J.L.: 1980, ’Blah, a System Which Explains Its Reasoning’.Artificial Intelligence 15, 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E.: 1987,Artificial Intelligence and Education. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B. and D.D. McDonald: 1984, ‘Context-Dependent Transitions in Discourse’.Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 355–361.

  • Wu, D.: 1991, ‘Active Acquisition of User Models: Implications for Decision Theoretic Dialog Planning and Recognition’.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cawsey, A. User modelling in interactive explanations. User Model User-Adap Inter 3, 221–247 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257890

Key words

Navigation