Abstract
Data from a representative sample of 312 developmentally disabled clients of Florida's Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services are analyzed to discover the characteristics of the clients and to determine the extent to which the clients are satisfied with various services, reasons for any dissatisfaction that exists, and the factors which are related to satisfaction with services. Clients are least likely to be satisfied with the caregiver support services and the vocational and rehabilitative services they receive. Across all categories, reasons most often given for dissatisfaction with services are inappropriateness and insufficient amount. The factors most strongly related to client satisfaction with services are age, living arrangements, and number of services received. Adolescents are less likely than persons at other ages to be satisfied with the services they receive, persons living in a family setting are less likely than persons in nonfamily settings to be satisfied with services, and the greater the number of services received the lower the likelihood of client satisfaction. Combined with information showing that most of the clients have multiple disabilities, these data suggest that the service delivery system does a better job of delivering some services than others. A “slot” oriented program such as that in Florida may pay insufficient attention to the existence of multiple needs among persons who are developmentally disabled and to providing services to the networks which form the client's economic and social support system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biklin, D. (1988). The Myth of clinical judgement.Journal of Social Issues, 44 127–140.
Bowe, F. (1984).Demography and disability: A chartbook for rehabilitation. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training Center.
Center for the Study of Population. (1987).A demographic study of persons with developmental disabilities in Florida, Part I, Demand analysis. Tallahassee, FL: Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.
Jacobson, J.W., & Janicki, M.P. (1983). Observed prevalence of multiple developmental disabilities.Mental Retardation, 21 87–94.
LaPlante, M. (1988).Data on disability from the National Health Interview Survey, 1983–1985. Washington, D.C: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
National Association of Developmental Disabilities Councils (NADDC). (1990).Forging a new ERA: The 1990 reports on people with developmental disabilities. Washington, D.C: National Association of Developmental Disabilities Councils.
Smith, S.K., Ahmed, B. & Sincich, F. (1988). Population estimates and projections by age, sex and race for Florida and its counties, 1987–2000.Population Studies, Bulletin No. 85–86. Gainesville, FL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida.
Tawney, J.W. & Demchak, M.S. (1984). Severely retarded? severely handicapped? multiply handicapped? A definitional analysis.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4 1–18.
U.S. Department of Education (1985).Seventy annual report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 94-142: The education for all handicapped children act. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Education.
Verbrugge, L.M. (1982). Sex differentials in health.Public Health Reports, 97 416–437.
Weller, R.H., Sly, D.F., Serow, W.J. & Micklin, M.M. (1989).A demographic study of persons with developmental disabilities in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weller, B. Client satisfaction with developmental disabilities services. Popul Environ 13, 121–139 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255515
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255515