Abstract
Residential and community satisfaction have been studied for many decades in an effort to understand human commitments to local places. In more recent years, concepts that more nearly reflect commitment have been developed, among them place attachment. Yet, the extensive, prior work on empirical indicators of satisfaction give that concept a particularly useful entry into studies of experiences of place, even though these may only provide estimates of phenomena of deeper commitment. The present study is drawn from the data for a large-scale investigation of the meaning ofcommunity in metropolitan America. Based on 2,622 women and men from 42 municipalities in 10 SMSAs across the United States, the study includes a sample of all socioeconomic statuses and from minority as well as majority populations. On the basis of factor analyses of a wide array of evaluations and satisfactions with housing, neighborhood, and the wider community, a structure for community satisfaction has been delineated. On the basis of these community satisfaction factors, along with several other social role and personality variables, an estimate is provided of the personal significance of community satisfaction in people's lives, using life satisfaction as the dependent variable. While there are socioeconomic status and other variations, community satisfactions appear to be important influences on life satisfaction at all socioeconomic status levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, Frank M., & Withey, Stephen B. (1976).Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.
Bardo, John W., & Bardo, Deborah J. (1983). A re-examination of subjective components of community satisfaction in a British new town.Journal of Social Psychology, 120 35–43.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, & Rodgers, Willard. (1976).The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fischer, Claude S. (1982).To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, Claude S., Jackson, Robert Max, Stueve, C. Ann, Gerson, Kathleen, & Jones, Lynne McCallister, with Baldassare, Mark. (1977).Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York: Free Press.
Fried, Marc. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.),The urban condition. New York: Basic Books.
Fried, Marc. (1965). Transitional functions of working-class communities: Implications for forced relocation. In M. B. Kantor (Ed.),Mobility and mental health. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Fried, Marc. (1973).The world of the urban working class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fried, Marc. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction.Journal of Social Issues, 38 107–120.
Fried, Marc, & Gleicher, Peggy. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban slum.Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27 305–315.
Gans, Herbert. (1962).The urban villagers. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Handal, Paul J., Barling, Philip W., & Morrissy, Eugene. (1981). Development of perceived and preferred measures of physical and social characteristics of the residential environment and their relationship to satisfaction.Journal of Community Psychology, 9 118–128.
Hole, James. (1866).The homes of the working classes: With suggestions for their improvements. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Hunter, Albert. (1974).Symbolic Communities: The persistence and change of Chicago's local communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hourihan, Kevin. (1984). Context-dependent models of residential satisfaction: An analysis of housing groups in Cork, Ireland.Environment and Behavior, 16 369–393.
Jennings, Hilda. (1962).Societies in the making: A study of development and redevelopment within a county borough. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Johnston, J. (1963).Econometric methods. New York: McGraw Hill.
Klein, Lawrence R. (1956).A textbook of econometrics. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
Marans, Robert W., & Rodgers, Willard. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. H. Hawley and V. P. Rock (Eds.),Metropolitan America in community perspective. New York: Wiley.
Michelson, William. (1977).Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Proshansky, Harold H., & Kaminoff, Robert D. (1980). Place identity: the Physical socialization of the self. Unpublished manuscript.
Riger, Stephanie, & Lavrakas, Paul J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9.
Riis, Jacob A. (1890, Reprint). (1957).How the other half lives: Studies among the tenements of New York. New York: Sagamore Press.
Stanback, Thomas M., Jr., & Knight, Richard. (1976).Suburbanization and the city. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun, and Co.
Stokols, Daniel. (1980). Group × place transactions: Some neglected issues in psychological research on place settings. In D. Magnusson (Ed.),The situation: An international perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stokols, Daniel, & Shumaker, Sally A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.),Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Whyte, William Foote. (1943).Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Woods, Robert A. (Ed.). (1902).Americans in process: A settlement study. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Young, Michael, & Willmott, Peter. (1957).Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Zorbaugh, Harvey W. (1929).The gold coast and the slum: A sociological study of Chicago's near North side. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Marc Fried, Dept. of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167.
The now defunct Center for Metropolitan Studies of the National Institute of Mental Health was most helpful, not only in funding this study but in many other respects as well. The author is also grateful to the many people who participated in the large-scale study of which this paper represents only a small part. In particular, John Havens and Lorna Ferguson were most important to the achieving of the objectives of the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fried, M. The structure and significance of community satisfaction. Popul Environ 7, 61–86 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254778
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254778