Skip to main content
Log in

The denouement of metapsychology

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

I once had a philosophy professor named Anderson who said everything twice, so we called him “Anderson-Anderson.” We used to think of him as just a funny character, but I realize now that he said everything twice-twice because he was trying to drum some very important ideas into us.

I remember particularly the day he lit into a student who was trying to prove that the world could be reduced to mathematical formulae. “Those aren't numbers-numbers out there,” Professor Anderson rumbled. “Those are people-people. Those are people out there!”

John David Stein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gill, M. and Holzman, P.Psychology versus Metapsychology. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gill, M. Metapsychology is not psychology. InPsychology versus Metapsychology. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klein, G.Psychoanalytic Theory: An Exploration of Essentials. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohut, H. Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 7: 450–83, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohut, H. Narcissism and narcissistic rage.Psychoanal. Study Child, 27: 360–400, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pribram, K. and Gill, M.Freud's Project Reassessed. London: Hutchinson and Co., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rapaport, D. and Gill, M. The points of view and assumptions of metapsychology.Int. J. Psychoanal., 40: 153–162, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schafer, R.A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stein, J. D.Sunday Star (The Toronto Star), January 8, 1978.

  10. Swanson, D. A critique of psychic energy as an explanatory concept.J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 25: 603–633, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Warme, G.A Critique of Psychoanalytic Metapsychology. Forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprint requests to Psychotherapy Centre, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T1R8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warme, G.E. The denouement of metapsychology. Am J Psychoanal 41, 249–259 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254713

Navigation