Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the properties of five pox virus strains isolated from monkeys

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Five strains of monkey pox viruses were compared with respect to their cultural characteristics in primary and continuous cell cultures and the lesions developed in embryonated eggs and in rabbit skin as well as to their hemagglutinating activity.

Four strains (“Copenhagen” “65-31” “65-32” and “7-61”) appeared to be similar in their properties. The cytopathogenic effect (CPE) was identical to that induced by vaccinia virus. There was no detectable virus multiplication in an pig kidney cell line (PEK). All four strains produced small, white, compact, hemorrhagic pock-like lesions on the chorioallantoic membrane.

The strain “64–7275”, isolated from healthy monkeys kidneys, had all properties of variola virus. It multiplied in the PEK cell line with a CPE. The lesions on the CAM were more compact without hemorrhage. In rabbit skin no detectable reaction occurred after infection with this strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alekseeva, A. K., and L. P.Izakova: Abstracts of papers of the 2nd scientific Conference of Moscow Res. Inst. Virus Prep., p. 6 (1960).

  2. Anderson, J.: Study of Fever. J. Churchill, London, p. 180 (1861).

  3. Gispen, R., enJ. G. Kapsenberg: Verslagen en Mededelingen betreffende de Volksgezondheid No. 12, blz. 140–144 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gispen, E., J. D. Verlinde, andP. Zwart: Arch. ges. Virusforsch.21, 2, 205–216 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulikova, K. S., G. E.Zalovkina, M. T.Romanova, and R. V.Dubrovskata: Abstracts of papers of the 2nd scientific Conference of Moscow Res. Inst. Virus Prep., p. 57 (1960).

  6. von Magnus, P., E. K. Andersen, K. B. Petersen, andA. Birch-Andersen: Acta path, microbiol. scand.46, 156–176 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. McConnel, S. J., J. F. Herman, D. E. Mattson, andL. Erickson: Nature (London)195, 1128–1129 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peters, J. C.: T. Diergeneesk.91, 6, 387–391 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prier, J. E., E. M. Sauer, R. G. Malsberger, andJ. H. Sillaman: Amer. J. Vet. Res.21, 381–384 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seibil, V. B.: In: “Important Problems in Virus Infections”. M., p. 416 (1965) (in Russian).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marennikova, S.S., Gurvich, E.B. & Shelukhina, E.M. Comparison of the properties of five pox virus strains isolated from monkeys. Archiv f Virusforschung 33, 201–210 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254676

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254676

Keywords

Navigation